Interprofessional supervision among allied health professionals: a systematic scoping review

References

• Alfonsson, S., Parling, T., Spännargård, Å., Andersson, G., & Lundgren, T. (2018). The effects of clinical supervision on supervisees and patients in cognitive behavioral therapy: A systematic review. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 47(3), 206–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2017.1369559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). ‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, N., & Russell-Mayhew, S. (2010). Preparing counsellors for interprofessional collaboration through supervision and lateral mentoring. Canadian Journal of Counselling & Psychotherapy, 44(3), 258–271.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2010). Interprofessional ethics: A developing field? Notes from the ethics & social welfare conference, Sheffield, UK, May 2010. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2010.516116
   Google Scholar
• Barker, K. K., & Hunsley, J. (2013). The use of theoretical models in psychology supervisor development research from 1994 to 2010: A systematic review. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 54(3), 176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, H. (2013). Toward a theoretical framework for interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.698328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in ‘the risk society’. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2012). External supervision in social work: Power, space, risk, and the search for safety. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2011.591187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L., & Howard, F. (2012). Interprofessional supervision in social work and psychology: Mandates and (inter) professional relationships. The Clinical Supervisor, 31(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2013.730471
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, S., Repa, L., & Renouf, A. (2020). Supervision in interprofessional education: Benefits, challenges, and lessons learned. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinart, H. (2014). Building and sustaining the supervisory relationship. In E. Watkins & D. L. Milne (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 255–281). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118846360.ch11.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C., & Mizrahi, T. (2001). An evolving paradigm of supervision within a changing health care environment. Social Work in Health Care, 32(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v32n04_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Paterson, J., Tufford, L., & King, R. (2011). Interprofessional clinical supervision in mental health and addiction: Toward identifying common elements. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.564961
   Google Scholar
• Boshoff, K., Murray, C., Worley, A., & Berndt, A. (2020). Interprofessional education placements in allied health: A scoping review. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 27(2), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2019.1642955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostock, L. (2015). Interprofessional staff supervision in health and social care. Pavilion Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, W. J., & Becker, K. D. (2021). Clinical supervision of mental health services: A systematic review of supervision characteristics and practices associated with formative and restorative outcomes. The Clinical Supervisor, 40(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2021.1904312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronstein, L., Kovacs, P., & Vega, A. (2007). Goodness of fit: Social work education and practice in health care. Social Work in Health Care, 45(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v45n02_04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, M., Boland, P., & Gowran, R. J. (2021). Understanding parents’ perspectives of support services for people living with spina bifida and/or hydrocephalus in Ireland: A qualitative exploration. Disabilities, 1(4), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities1040028
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, T. (1996). Primary attempts at research-based evaluation of clinical supervision. NT Research, 1(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/174498719600100205
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, T. (2001). Clinical supervision and clinical governance for the twenty-first century. In J. Cutcliffe, T. Butterworth, & B. Proctor (Eds.), Fundamental themes in clinical supervision (pp. 316–319). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callicott, K., & Leadbetter, J. (2013). An investigation of factors involved when educational psychologists supervise other professionals. Educational Psychology in Practice, 29(4), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2013.853649
   Google Scholar
• Chipchase, L., Allen, S., Eley, D., McAllister, L., & Strong, J. (2012). Interprofessional supervision in an intercultural context: A qualitative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(6), 465–471. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.718813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocket, K. (2009). Possibilities and limits of cross-disciplinary supervision: An exploratory study. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 29(2), 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2015). Interprofessional supervision: Opportunities and challenges. In L. Bostock (Ed.), Interprofessional staff supervision in adult health and social care services (pp. 37–41). Pavilion Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, M., Phillips, B., & Leggat, S. (2013). Clinical supervision for allied health professionals: A systematic review. Journal of Allied Health, 42(2), 65–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickie, R., Bartle, D. E., Jackman, K., & Bonney, D. (2019). Clinical supervisors’ experiences of using an interprofessional clinical supervision model in an acute care setting. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(6), 812–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1594728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliassen, M., Henriksen, N. O., & Moe, S. (2018). Physiotherapy supervision of home trainers in interprofessional reablement teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(5), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1541877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M V. (2017). Narratives of harmful clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 36(1), 20–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2017.1297752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V., Ladany, N., Krengel, M., & Schult, D. (1996). Clinical supervision research from 1981 to 1993: A methodological critique. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2014). Clinical supervision: The state of the art. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(11), 1030–1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, K., & Berendonk, C. (2020). Identity matters - perceptions of inter-professional feedback in the context of workplace-based assessment in diabetology training: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1932-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin, J., Valiquette-Tessier, S., Vandette, M., & Romano, E. (2015). Evaluation of a youth agency’s supervision practices: A mixed-method approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 52, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, N., & Miller, S. I. (1974). The social worker in undergraduate medical education. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 20(3–4), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076407402000312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, H. E. (2014). Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 21(6), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.21.6.34.e1252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hair, H. J. (2013). The purpose and duration of supervision, and the training and discipline of supervisors: What social workers say they need to provide effective services. The British Journal of Social Work, 43(8), 1562–1588. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R. T., & Frankena, S. T. (1972). Peer group supervision. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 42(3), 527–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1972.tb02519.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Service Executive. (2020). Progressing Disability Services for Children and Young People Programme (PDS). https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/list/4/disability/progressing-disability/pds-programme/progressing-disability-services-for-children-and-young-people-programme-2020.docx
   Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, M., Hannes, K., & Onghena, P. (2016). Using mixed methods research synthesis for literature reviews: The mixed methods research synthesis approach (Vol. 4). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelle, K. M., Skutle, O., Alvsvåg, H., & Førland, O. (2018). Reablement teams’ roles: A qualitative study of interdisciplinary teams’ experiences. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 11, 305–316. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S160480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, J., Cooper, L., & O’Donoghue, K. (2016). Cross-disciplinary supervision amongst social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 26(4), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol26iss4id26
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., & Green, T. (2020). Seeing more, better sight: Using an interprofessional model of supervision to support reflective child protection practice within the health setting. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(3), 814–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivu, A., Saarinen, P. I., & Hyrkas, K. (2012). Who benefits from clinical supervision and how? The association between clinical supervision and the work‐related well‐being of female hospital nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(17–18), 2567–2578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04041.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolehmainen-Aitken, R. L. (2004). Decentralization’s impact on the health workforce: Perspectives of managers, workers and national leaders. Human Resources for Health, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-2-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Launer, J. (2018). The irresistible rise of interprofessional supervision. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 94(1114), 481–482. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, D., & Boyce, R. A. (2003). Beyond organisational design: Moving from structure to service enhancement. Australian Health Review, 26(1), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH030175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, M., Gallego, G., Dew, A., Bulkeley, K., Veitch, C., Bundy, A., Brentnall, J., Chedid, R. J, and Griffiths S. (2014). Recruitment and retention of allied health professionals in the disability sector in rural and remote New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 39(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2013.861393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, T. L. (2021). Ethical considerations in clinical supervision: Components of effective clinical supervision across an interprofessional team. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(2), 478–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00514-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longman, J., Barraclough, F., & Swain, L. (2020). The benefits and challenges of a rural community-based work-ready placement program for allied health students. Rural and Remote Health, 20(3), 5706–5706. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH5706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangiameli, J., Hamiduzzaman, M., Lim, D., Pickles, D., & Isaac, V. (2021). Rural disability workforce perspective on effective inter‐disciplinary training: A qualitative pilot study. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 29(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P., Copley, J., & Tyack, Z. (2014). Twelve tips for effective clinical supervision based on a narrative literature review and expert opinion. Medical Teacher, 36(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.852166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P., Kumar, S., & Lizarondo, L. (2017). When I say … clinical supervision. Medical Education, 51(9), 890–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P., Lizarondo, L., Kumar, S., Snowdon, D., & Patman, S. (2021). Impact of clinical supervision on healthcare organisational outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review. PLOS ONE, 16(11), e0260156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, L., Nagarajan, S, & Scott, L. (2018). Developing Measures of Placement Quality in Allied Health, Dentistry, Medicine, and Pharmacy. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 6(2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v6i2.493
   Google Scholar
• Milne, D. (2007). An empirical definition of clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466507X197415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, D., Aylott, H., Fitzpatrick, H., & Ellis, M. V. (2008). How does clinical supervision work? Using a “best evidence synthesis” approach to construct a basic model of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325220802487915
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullarkey, K., Keeley, P., & Playle, J. F. (2001). Multiprofessional clinical supervision: Challenges for mental health nurses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 8(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2001.00376.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., Jacobsen, C. H., & Mathiesen, B. B. (2012). Novice supervisors’ tasks and training: A descriptive study. Nordic Psychology, 64(3), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2012.731312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, K. (2004). Uniprofessional, multiprofessional, field of practice, discipline: Social workers and cross-disciplinary supervision. Social Work Review, 16(3), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Olds, K., & Hawkins, R. (2014). Precursors to measuring outcomes in clinical supervision: A thematic analysis. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, C., & Burton, S. (2014). Emotional literacy support assistants’ views on supervision provided by educational psychologists: What EPs can learn from group supervision. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2014.899202
   Google Scholar
• Palomo, M., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. J. (2010). Development and validation of the supervisory relationship questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466509X441033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, N., Beinart, H., Clohessy, S., & Cooper, M. (2013). Development and validation of the supervisory relationship measure: A self‐report questionnaire for use with supervisors. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, A., Campbell, P., Deery, R., Fleming, M., Rankin, J., Sloan, G., & Cheyne, H. (2017). A systematic review of evidence relating to clinical supervision for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(8), 1825–1837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, J., & Wilton, A. (2019). Professional identity of allied health staff. Journal of Allied Health, 48(1), 11–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Psychological Society of Ireland. (2019, September, 20). Comment from the Psychological Society of Ireland regarding proposed line management duties of children’s disability network managers. https://www.psychologicalsociety.ie/source/CNDM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rice, F., Cullen, P., McKenna, H., Kelly, B., Keeney, S., & Richey, R. (2007). Clinical supervision for mental health nurses in Northern Ireland: Formulating best practice guidelines. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 14(5), 516–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01101.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robiner, W. N., Hong, B. A., & Ward, W. (2021). Psychologists’ contributions to medical education and interprofessional education in medical schools. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 28(4), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-020-09730-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, C., Kehoe, A., Farook, S. F., & Illing, J. (2021). Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: A rapid evidence review. BMJ Open, 11(9), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed‐method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<246:AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, K., Robson, K., & Vien, K. (2021). Interprofessional education: A unique approach to addressing the challenges of student assessment. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(4), 564–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1780202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowdon, D. A., Leggat, S. G., & Taylor, N. F. (2017). Does clinical supervision of healthcare professionals improve effectiveness of care and patient experience? A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2739-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snowdon, D. A., Sargent, M., Williams, C. M., Maloney, S., Caspers, K., & Taylor, N. F. (2020). Effective clinical supervision of allied health professionals: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4873-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, S. H., Wilson, J., Kavanagh, D., Strong, J., & Worrall, L. (2001). Clinical supervision in four mental health professions: A review of the evidence. Behaviour Change, 18(3), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.18.3.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweifach, J. S. (2019). A look behind the curtain at social work supervision in interprofessional practice settings: Critical themes and pressing practical challenges. European Journal of Social Work, 22(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1357020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasgard, M., & Collins, V. (2003). A comprehensive review of a cross-disciplinary, case-based peer supervision model. Families, Systems, & Health, 21(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.1037/1091-7527.21.3.305
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townend, M. (2005). Interprofessional supervision from the perspectives of both mental health nurses and other professionals in the field of cognitive behavioural psychotherapy. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 12(5), 582–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2005.00878.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G. … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassos, M. V., & Nankervis, K. L. (2012). Investigating the importance of various individual, interpersonal, organisational and demographic variables when predicting job burnout in disability support workers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(6), 1780–1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voytenko, V. L., VanOrman, B. T., Jaarsma, R. D., Bishop, T. W., Mavis, B. E., & Achtyes, E. D. (2021). Getting involved in training the next generation of physicians: Examples of practicing psychologists in psychiatry and family medicine residency programs. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 52(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Heading off boundary problems: Clinical supervision as risk management. Psychiatric Services, 50(11), 1435–1439. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.50.11.1435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedlock, M., & Turner, M. (2017). ‘You kind of pull back the layers’: The experience of inter-professional supervision with educational psychologists. Educational and Child Psychology, 34(3), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2017.34.3.130
   Google Scholar
• Wharton T. (2017). Rigor, Transparency, and Reporting Social Science Research. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(4), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515622264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, E. (2018). Measuring clinical supervision: How beneficial is yours and how do you know? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(7), 1437–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstanley, J. (2000). Manchester clinical supervision scale. Nursing Standard, 14(19), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.14.19.31.s54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/70185/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar