An evaluation of personal medical services: the times they are a changin'

References

• AITKIN, K. & LUNT, N. (1995). Nurse in practice. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• AITKIN, K., LUNT, N., PARKER, G. & HURST, M. (1993). Nurses count: national census of practice nurses. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• ALASZWESKI, A. (1996). Restructuring health and welfare professions in the United Kingdom: the impact of internal markets on the medical, nursing and social work professions. In: T. JOHNSON, G. LARKIN & M. SAKS (Eds), Health professions and the state in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BAGGOTT, R. (1998). Health and health care in Britain, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• BARR, H. (2001). Interprofessional education: today, yesterday and tomorrow–a review. London: Learn and Teach Support Nurses of Health Social and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• BLANE, D. (2000). Health Professions. In: G. SCRAMBLER (Ed.), Sociology as applied to medicine. London: WB Saunders. DEAN, J. (1994). Making sense of practice finance, 2nd edn. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.
   Google Scholar
• DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (1996). Primary care: The future, choice and opportunity. London: Stationery Office. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (1997a). The NHS (Primary Care) Act. 1997. London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (1997b). The new NHS: modern, dependable. London: Stationery Office. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (2001). Shifting the balance, securing delivery. London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• EATON, G.& WEBB, B. (1979). Boundary encroachment: pharmacists in a clinical setting. Sociology of Health and Illness, 1, 69– 89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EINRICH, B. & ENGLISH, G. (1976). Complaints and disorders: sexual politics of sickness. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• FRIEDSON, E. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of applied knowledge. New York: Harper Row.
   Google Scholar
• GAMARNIKOW, E. (1978). Sexual division of labour: the case of nursing. In: A. KUHN & A. WOLPE (Eds), Feminism and materialism, women and modes of production (pp 96–123). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• GAME, A. & PRINGLE, R. (1983). Gender at work. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• GERRISH, K., POLLARD, J. & ROSS, B. (1998). Integrated nursing teams in Sheffield: the team’s perspective. Primary Health Care., 8(8), 12– 14.
   Google Scholar
• GUY, E.M. (1986). Professionals in organisations. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• ILIFFE, S. & MUNRO, J. (1993). General practitioners and incentives. British Medical Journal, 307, 1156– 1157.
   Google Scholar
• JAMOUS, H. & PELOILLE, B. (1970). Changes in the French university hospital system. In: J.A. JACKSON (Ed.), Professions and professionalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• JEFFREYS, M. & SACHS, H. (1983). Rethinking general practice. London: Tavistock. JOHNSON, T. (1972). Professions and power. London: Macmillan Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• LEESE, B., GOSDEN, T., RILEY, A.J. & ALLEN, L. (1999). Setting out: Piloting innovations in primary care. Manchester: NPCRDC.
   Google Scholar
• LEATHARD, A. (1994). Interprofessional developments in Britain: an overview. In: A LEATHARD (Ed.), Going interprofessional (pp 3–37). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MEADS, G., RILEY, A.J., HARDING, G. & CARTER, Y.H. (2003). Personal medical services: local organisational developments. Primary Healthcare Research and Development. In Press.
   Google Scholar
• NHS EXECUTIVE (1998). Personal medical services pilots under the NHS (Primary Care) Act 1997, 3rd edn. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• NHS EXECUTIVE (2000). Personal medical services pilots under the NHS (Primary Care) Act 1997, 3rd edn. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• OVRETVEIT, J. (1997). Planning and managing interprofessional working and teams. In: J. OVRETVEIT, P. MATHIAS & T. THOMPSON (Eds), Interprofessional working for health and social care (pp 34–52). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• PARKIN, F. (1974). Strategies of social closure in class formation. In: F. PARKIN (Ed.), The social analysis of class structure. (pp. 1–18). London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• QUINNEY, D. & PEARSON, M. (1996). Different worlds, missed opportunities: Primary health care nursing in north western health district. Liverpool: University of Liverpool Health and Community Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• RITCHIE, J. & SPENCER, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: A. BRYMAN & R.G. BURGESS (Eds), Analysing qualitative data (pp 173–94). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ROWLEY, E. (1994). The role of the practice nurse. In: G. HUNT & P. WAINWRIGHT (Eds), Expanding the role of the nurse: The scope for professional practice. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• STRAUSS, A. (1966). The structure of American nursing: an interpretation. In: F. DAVIES (Ed.), The nursing profession: five sociological essays. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• THE PMS NATIONAL EVALUATION TEAM (2000). The national evaluation of the first wave personal medical services (PMS) pilots: summary of progress at March 2000. Manchester: NPCRDC.
   Google Scholar
• WEST, M.A. & SLATER, J. (1996). Teamworking in primary health care: a review of its effectiveness. London: Health Education Authority.
   Google Scholar
• WEST, M.A. & POULTON, B.C. (1997). A failure of function: teamwork in primary health care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 11(2), 205– 216.
   Google Scholar
• WRIGHT, P. (1979). A study of the legitimisation of knowledge: the success of medicine, the failure of astrology. In: WALLIS, R. (Ed.), On the margins of science. Sociological Review. Keele: Monograph 17.
   Google Scholar