Relative professional roles in antenatal care: results of a survey in Scottish rural general practice

References

• ALLEN, I., DOWLING, S.B. & WILLIAMS, S. (1997). A leading role for midwives? Evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice Development Projects. London: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• BAIRD, A.G., JEWELL, D. & WALKER, J.J. (1996). Management of labour in an isolated rural maternity hospital. British Medical Journal, 312, 223– 226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAIRD, G. (1999). Community hospitals and maternity units. In: COX, J. & MUNGALL, I. (eds). Rural healthcare. (pp. 141–151). Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.
   Google Scholar
• BATTERSBY, S. & THOMSON, A.M. (1997). Community midwives’ and general practitioners’ perspectives, of antenatal care in the community. Midwifery, 13, 92– 99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002). Your contract, your future: general practice contract and explanatory notes from the GPC. [http://bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/Your + contract + your + future] Accessed 16th June 2002.
   Google Scholar
• CHAPMAN, P. (1996). Women and access in rural areas: what makes the difference? What difference does it make? Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• CLINICAL RESOURCES AUDIT GROUP (CRAG) & SCOTTISH MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE GROUP (ScotMEG) WORKING
   Google Scholar
• GROUP ON MATERNITY SERVICES. (1995). Antenatal care. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
   Google Scholar
• CRAFT, N. (1997). Women’s health: the childbearing years and after. British Medical Journal, 315, 1301– 1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CUNNINGHAM, W.F. & SARGEANT, J. (1995). Teamwork in rural practice. In: COX, J. (Ed.) Rural general practice in the UK. (pp. 19–22). Occasional paper 71. London: Royal College of General Practitioners.
   Google Scholar
• DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. (1993). Changing childbirth. Part 1: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• DOWSWELL, T., RENFREW, M., HEWISON, J. & GREGSON, B. (2001). A review of the literature on the midwife and community-based maternity care. Midwifery, 17, 93– 101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FARMER, J., IVERSEN, L. & BAIRD, G. (2001). Rural deprivation: reflecting reality. British Journal of General Practice, 51, 486– 491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FARQUHAR, M., CAMMILLERI-FERRANTE, C. & TODD, C. (2000). General practitioners’ views of working with team midwifery. British Journal of General Practice, 50, 211– 213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FENWICK, N., MORGAN, M., MCKENZIE, C.& WOLFE, C. (1998). General practitioners’ attitudes to the development of midwifery group practices. British Journal of General Practice, 48, 1395– 1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLEISSIG, A., KROLL, D. & MCCARTHY, M. (1997). General practitioners’ views on the implementation of community- led maternity care in South Camden, London. British Journal of General Practice, 47, 45– 46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GANTLEY, M., HARDING, G., KUMAR, S.& TISSIER, J. (1999). An introduction to qualitative methods for health professionals. London: RCGP.
   Google Scholar
• GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL. (1992) Your choices for the future: a survey of GP opinion. London: GMC.
   Google Scholar
• JENSEN, G.M. & ROYEEN, C.B. (2002). Improved rural access to care: dimensions of best practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16(2), 117– 128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JEWELL, D., SANDERS, J. & SHARP, D. (2000). The views and anticipated needs of women in early pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 107, 1237– 1240.
   Google Scholar
• JOINT WORKING GROUP OF THE SOCIETY OF RURAL PHYSICIANS OF CANADA (SRPC), THE COLLEGE OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS OF CANADA (CFPC) COMMITTEE ON MATERNITY CARE & THE SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNAECOLOGISTS OF CANADA (SOGC). (1998). Rural obstetrics: joint position on rural maternity care. Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine, 3, 75– 82.
   Google Scholar
• KING, T. & SHAH, M.A. (1998). Integrated midwife-physician practice: obstetric Darwinism? Journal of Nurse- Midwifery, 43(1), 55– 60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LEATHARD, A. (Ed.) (1994). Going interprofessional: working together for health and welfare. Routledge: London. MCCALLIN, A. (2001). Interdisciplinary practice - a matter of teamwork: an integrated literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10, 419– 428.
   Google Scholar
• MARSH, G. & RENFREW, M. (eds). (1999). Community-based maternity care. Oxford: Oxford University Press. MUNGALL, I. (1995). Qualitative differences between urban and rural practice. COX, J. (Ed.) Rural general practice in the UK. (pp. 10–12). Occasional paper 71. London: Royal College of General Practitioners.
   Google Scholar
• NHS IN SCOTLAND INFORMATION AND STATISTICS DIVISION. (2001). General Medical Practitioner Database. Edinburgh: ISD.
   Google Scholar
• NHS SCOTLAND. (2001a). Caring for Scotland: the strategy for nursing and midwifery in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• NHS SCOTLAND. (2001b). A Framework for Maternity Services in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• POWELL, M. (1995). On the outside looking in: medical geography, medical geographers and access to health care. Health and Place, 1, 41– 50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REID, M., BARBOUR, R. & TUCKER, J. (1999). Professional views on randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Midwifery, 7, 637– 641.
   Google Scholar
• REMOTE AND RURAL AREAS RESOURCES INITIATIVE (RARARI) SOLUTIONS GROUP. (2002). Solutions for the provision of health care in the remote and rural areas of Scotland in the 21st century. Fort William, Scotland: RARARI.
   Google Scholar
• RICHARDS, A., CARLEY, J., JENKINS-CLARKE, S. & RICHARDS, D.A. (2000). Skill mix between nurses and doctors working in primary care - delegation or allocation: a review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 37(3), 185– 197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RICHARDSON, G., MAYNARD, A., CULLUM, N. & KINDIG, D. (1998). Skill mix changes: substitution or service development? Health Policy, 45, 119– 132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROUSSEAU, N. (1995). What is rurality? In: COX, J. (ed.) Rural general practice in the United Kingdom. Occasional paper 71. London: Royal College of General Practitioners.
   Google Scholar
• ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS. (1995). The role of general practice in maternity care: report of the RCGP Maternity Care Group. London: RCGP.
   Google Scholar
• ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS. (1999). Rural general practice. RCGP Information Sheet no. 23. London: RCGP.
   Google Scholar
• RUSHMER, R. (2002). Inter-professional working: the wisdom of integrated working and the disaster of blurred boundaries. Proceedings of Fifth International conference on Strategic Issues in Health Care: Policy, Finance and Performance, University of St. Andrews, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. (1998). Statement of fees and allowances payable to general medical practitioners in Scotland from April 1990: ‘the Red Book’. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Health Department.
   Google Scholar
• SIKORSKI, J., CLEMENT, S., WILSON, J., DAS, S. & SMEETON, N. (1995). A survey of health professional views on possible changes in the provision and organization of antenatal care. Midwifery, 11, 61– 68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SINGLETON, J.K. & GREEN-HERNANDEZ, C. (1998). Interdisciplinary education and practice: Has its time come? Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 43(1), 3– 7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SMITH, L.F. (1996). Views of pregnant women on the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care. British Journal of General Practice, 46, 101– 104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEMPLE, J. (Chair) (2002). Future practice: proposals of an advisory group commissioned by the Scottish Executive to review the Scottish medical workforce. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. [http:www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/health/fpmr00.asp]
   Google Scholar
• UKCC (UK CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR NURSING, MIDWIFERY AND HEALTH VISITING.) (1998). Midwifery rules and code of practice. London: UKCC.
   Google Scholar
• UKCC (UK CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR NURSING, MIDWIFERY AND HEALTH VISITING.) (2001). Fitness for practice and purpose. London: UKCC.
   Google Scholar
• WARD, A. (1999). Teamwork. In: COX, J. & MUNGALL, I. (Eds.) Rural healthcare. (pp. 93–104). Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.
   Google Scholar
• WILLIAMS, N., SHUCKSMITH, M., EDMOND, H. & GEMMELL, A. (1998). Scottish rural life update: a revised socio-economic profile of rural Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office Central Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• YOUNG, G. (1998). Committee said that midwives and GPs should work in partnership. British Medical Journal, 316, 554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZANDER, L. (1990). Antenatal and postnatal care: a GP’s perspective. Practitioner, 234, 362– 365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar