The logic of collaboration in education and the human services

References

• ABRAMSON, J. & MIZRAHI, T. (1996). When social workers and physicians collaborate: Positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences. Social Work, 41, 270–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALTER, C. (1990). Conflict and cooperation in interorganizational service delivery systems. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 78–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLARK, P. & DRINKA, T. (2002). Exploring responsibility, accountability, and authority in geriatric team performance. In: M. MEZEY, C. CASSEL, M. BOTTRELL, K. HYER, J. HOWE & T. FULMER (Eds), Ethical patient care: A casebook for geriatric health teams (pp. 208–229). Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CROWSON, R.& BOYD, W. (1996). Achieving coordinated school-linked services: Facilitating utilization of the emerging knowledge base. Educational Policy, 10, 253–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DUNCAN, H. (1962). Communication and social order. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EDELMAN, I. (2001). Participation and service integration in community-based initiatives. Journal of Community Practice, 9, 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• FERGUSON, R. (1999). Conclusion: Social science research, urban problems, and community development. In: R. FERGUSON & W. DICKENS (Eds), Urban problems and community development (pp. 569–610). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• GARDNER, S. (1999). Beyond collaboration to results: Hard choices in the future of services to children and families. Fullerton, CA: Center for Collaboration for Children, California State University.
   Google Scholar
• HALL, R. (2002). Organizations: structures, processes, and outcomes. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• KRAATZ, M. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change? Academy of Management Review, 41, 621–643.
   Google Scholar
• LAWSON, H. (2003). Pursuing and securing collaboration to improve results. In M. BRABECK and M. WALSH (Eds), Meeting at the hyphen: Schools-universities-communities-professions in collaboration for student achievement and well being (pp. 45–73). The 102nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• LAWSON, H. & BARKDULL, C. (2001). Gaining the collaborative advantage and promoting systems and cross-systems change. In: A. SALLEE, H. LAWSON & K. BRIAR-LAWSON (Eds), Innovative practices with vulnerable children and families (pp. 245–270). Dubuque, IA: Eddie Bowers Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• LAWSON, H. & BRIAR-LAWSON, K. (1997). Connecting the dots: Integrating school reform, school-linked services, parent involvement and community schools. Oxford, OH: The Danforth Foundation & The Institute for Educational Renewal at Miami University.
   Google Scholar
• LAWSON, H. & SAILOR, W. (2000). Integrating services, collaborating, and developing connections with schools. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCCANN, J. & GRAY, B. (1986). Power and collaboration in human service domains. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 6, 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• MCKNIGHT, J. (1995). The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• MITCHELL, R., AGLE, B. & WOOD, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOLM, L., TAKAHASHIN., N.& PETERSON, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1496–1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOORE, R. & SANDLER, S. (2004). Supporting the education organizing movement: An exchange between intermediaries. San Francisco: Justice Matters Institute.
   Google Scholar
• NATHAN, M. & MITROFF, I. (1991). The use of negotiated order theory as a tool for the analysis and development of an interorganizational Field. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 163–180.
   Google Scholar
• OLIVER, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions.’ Academy of Management Review, 15, 241–265.
   Google Scholar
• OLIVER, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAY, K. (2002). The nimble collaboration: Fine-tuning your collaboration for lasting success. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• REASON, P. (1999). General medical and complementary practitioners working together: The epistemological demands of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• REILLY, T. (2000). Collaboration in action: An uncertain process. Administration in Social Work, 25, 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• SANDFORT, J. (1999). The Structural impediments to human service collaboration: Examining welfare reform at the front line. Social Service Review, 73, 314–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHMITT, M. (2001). Collaboration improves the quality of care: methodological challenges and evidence from US health care research. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15, 47–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SEASHORE LOUIS, K., TOOLE, J. & HARGREAVES, A. (1999). Rethinking school improvement. In J. MURPHY, & K. SEASHORE LOUIS (Eds), The handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 277–295). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• SHRADER, R. (2001). Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: The case of high-technology manufacturing firms. Academy of Management Review, 44, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• VANGEN, S. & HUXHAM, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• WANDERSMAN, A., VALOIS, R., OCHS, L., CRUZDE LA , E.& GOODMAN, R. (1996). Toward a social ecology of community coalitions. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 299–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHITE, J. & WEHLAGE, G. (1995). Community collaboration: If it is such a good idea, why is it so hard? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WOOD, D. & GRAY, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139–162.
   Google Scholar