Effective Health Care Teams: A model of six characteristics developed from shared perceptions

References

• Anderson, N., & West, M. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 19, 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. (1992). Homeward bound: A new course for community health. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Cashman, S. B., Reidy, P., Cody, K., & Lemay, C. A. (2004). Developing and measuring progress toward collaborative, integrated, interdisciplinary health care teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(2), 183–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, T. G. (1978). Self-regulating work groups: A socio-technical synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 3, 625–634.
   Google Scholar
• Drinka, T. J. K., & Clark, P. G. (2000). Helath Care Teamwork. Westport, Connecticut: Auburn House.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, R. E., Lech, B. A., & Rubin, I. (1974). Working with the primary care team: first intervention. In H. Wise, R. Beckhard, I. Rubin & A. L. Kyte (Eds), Making health teams work (pp. 27-68). Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 195–220). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. (1996). Fundamental considerations about work groups. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 3–24). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organization behaviour (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. New York: HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• Mickan, S. (2002). Understanding effective teams in healthcare environments. PhD thesis, The university of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Mickan, S. M. (2005). Evaluating the effectiveness of health care teams. Australian Health Review, 29(2), 211–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mickan, S., & Rodger, S. (2000a). Characteristics of effective teams: A literature review. Australian Health Review, 23(3), 201–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mickan, S., & Rodger, S. (2000b). The organisational context for teamwork: Comparing health care and business literature. Australian Health Review, 23(1), 179–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molyneux, J. (2001). Interprofessional teamworking: what makes teams work well? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(1), 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1998). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 56–85). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pethybridge, J. (2004). How team working influences discharge planning from hospital: a study of four multi- disciplinary teams in an acute hospital in England. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(1), 29–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (1993). Foundations of clinical research. Norwalk, CT: Appletone and Lange.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L., & Richards, T. J. (1998). NUD*IST. Melbourne: La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, P. L., Schleifer, L. L. F., & Switzer, F. S. (1995). Nominal Group Technique-an aid in implementing Total Quality Management. The CPA Journal, 5, 68–69.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. L. G. (1994). Methodology for sharing personal construct systems. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 7, 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Scho¨ n, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. (1987). Groups as human resources. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. W. (1975). Strategies of social research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thylefors, I., Persson, O. & Hellstrom, D. (2005). Team types, perceived efficiency and team climate in Swedish cross-professional teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(2), 102–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West, M. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. West & L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 309–334). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. (2000). Reflexivity, Revolution, and Innovation in Work Teams. In M. M. Beyerlein & D. A. Johnson & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams (Vol. 5, pp. 1–29). Stamford, Connecticut: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., & Retsas, A. P. (1997). Personal constructs of nursing practice: a comparative analysis of three groups of Australian nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 34(1),63–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar