467
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

An artful becoming: the case for a practice-led research approach to open educational practice research

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 17 Oct 2023, Accepted 08 Mar 2024, Published online: 22 Apr 2024

References

  • Anderson, T., and J. Shattuck. 2012. Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher 41, no. 1: 16–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813.
  • Andrade, A., A. Caine, R. Carneiro, U. Ehlers, C. Holmberg, A.-K. Kairamo, T. Koskinen, et al. 2011. Beyond OER – Shifting Focus to Open Educational Practices: OPAL Report.
  • Biesta, G. 2009. Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21, no. 1: 33–46. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9.
  • Bolt, B. 2014. The magic is in the handling. In Practice as research: approaches to creative arts enquiry, 27–34. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford University Press. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=78c48fd0-9846-3d45-9878-f67fdf2ec702.
  • Brandenburger, B. 2022. A multidimensional and analytical perspective on open educational practices in the 21st century. Frontiers in Education 7. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.990675.
  • Brown, C., and L. Czerniewicz. 2010. Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26, no. 26: 357–69. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x.
  • Cape Town Open Education Declaration. 2023a. Read the Declaration. Cape Town Open Education Declaration: Unlocking the Promise of Open Educational Resources. https://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read/.
  • Cape Town Open Education Declaration. 2023b. Cape Town Open Education Declaration: Ten directions to move open education forward. https://www.capetowndeclaration.org/cpt10/.
  • Colebrook, C. 2020. Understanding deleuze. London: Routledge.
  • Conole, G.C., and U.-D. Ehlers. 2010. Open educational practices: Unleashing the power of OER, [Paper presentation]. UNESCO workshop on OER, Windoek, Nambia. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ulf-Ehlers/publication/260423350_Open_Educational_Practices_Unleashing_the_power_of_OER/links/5765783508ae421c4489d247/Open-Educational-Practices-Unleashing-the-power-of-OER.pdf.
  • Coole, D., and S. Frost. 2010. New materialisms: ontology, agency, and politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Cordova, R. 2016. DIY punk as education: from Mis? education to educative healing. Charlotte: IAP.
  • Cronin, C. 2017. Openness and praxis: exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18, no. 5. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096.
  • Davis, O. 2023. The Languaged Exterior and the Felt Interior’: Undercurrents of Logocentrism within Practice-Led Research Scholarship. April. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct = true&db = ir01089a&AN = deun.article.1743&site = eds-live&scope = site.
  • Decuypere, M. 2019. Open education platforms: theoretical ideas, digital operations and the figure of the open learner. European Educational Research Journal 18, no. 4: 439–60. doi:10.1177/1474904118814141.
  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1996. What Is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Dewey, J. 1904. The relation of theory to practice in education. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 5, no. 5: 9–30. doi:10.1177/016146810400500601.
  • Dolphijn, R., and I. V. Tuin. 2012. New materialism: interviews & cartographies. Open Humanities Press.
  • Dunn, K. 2016. Global punk: resistance and rebellion in everyday life. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Efron, S.E., and R. Ravid. 2019. Action research in education: A practical guide. New York: Guilford Publications.
  • Ellis, C., and T.E. Adams. 2020. Practicing autoethnography and living the autoethnographic life. In The Oxford handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., ed. Patricia Leavy. Oxford Handbooks, Oxford Academic. https://doi-org.ezproxy-b.deakin.edu.au/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190847388.013.21
  • Fox, N.J., and P. Alldred. 2015. New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18, no. 4: 399–414. doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.921458.
  • Freire, P. 2018. Pedagogy of the oppressed: 50th anniversary edition. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Gorur, R., and J. P. Koyama. 2013. “The struggle to technicise in education policy. deakin university.” Journal Contribution. https://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30074816
  • Haseman, B. 2010. Chapter 11 rupture and recognition: identifying the performative research paradigm. In Practice as research: approaches to creative arts inquiry,147–58. New York: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
  • Haseman, B., and D. Mafe. 2009. Chapter 11 acquiring know-How: research training for practice-led researchers. In Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts,211–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.1515/9780748636303-012
  • Inamorato, A. D. S. 2018. Going open: policy recommendations on open education in Europe (OpenEdu policies). JRC Publications Repository
  • Inamorato, A. D. S., Y. Punie, and M. J. Castaño. 2016. Opening up education: A support framework for higher education institutions. JRC Publications Repository.
  • Johns, C. 1994. Nuances of reflection. Journal of Clinical Nursing 3, no. 2: 71–4. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.1994.tb00364.x.
  • Kahn-Egan, S. 1998. Pedagogy of the pissed: punk pedagogy in the first-year writing classroom. College Composition and Communication 49, no. 1: 99–104. doi:10.2307/358563.
  • Kavanaugh, L. 2008. Situating situationism: wandering around new babylon with mille plateaux. Architectural Theory Review 13, no. 2: 254–70. doi:10.1080/13264820802216874.
  • Knox, J. 2013. Five critiques of the open educational resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education 18, no. 8: 821–32. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.774354.
  • Kontturi, K.-K. 2018. Ways of Following. London: Open Humanities Press. Disponível em: Acesso em: 23 January. 2024. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id = e55c82c4-fda7-37c0-8a09-454045c85fbe.
  • Lane, A. 2009. The impact of openness on bridging educational digital divides. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 10: 5. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.637.
  • McAndrew, P. 2010. Defining openness: updating the concept of "open" for a connected world. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2010, no. 2: 10. doi:10.5334/2010-10.
  • McNamara, A. 2012. Six rules for practice-led research. TEXT 16, no. Special 14. doi:10.52086/001c.31169.
  • Mulder, F., and B. Janssen. 2013. Opening Up Education. In Trend Report: Open Educational Resources 2013.
  • OpenEd19. n.d. About the open education conference. https://openeducationconference.org/about.
  • Pascal, C., and T. Bertram. 2012. Praxis, ethics and power: developing praxeology as a participatory paradigm for early childhood research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 20, no. 4: 477–92. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2012.737236.
  • Philippakos, Z.A., E. Howell, and A. Pellegrino, eds. 2021. Design-based research in education: theory and applications. Guilford Publications.
  • Romero, N. 2019. Pilipinx becoming, punk rock pedagogy, and the new materialism. International Education Journal 18: 40–54.
  • Schatzki Theodore, A. 2001. Introduction: practice theory. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, eds. T Schatzki, K Knorr Cetina, and E von Savigny, 1–14. London: Routledge.
  • Schön, D.A. 1991. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Taylor and Francis. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id = 9c5cfb07-c263-3e6c-a301-cbcd0a678515.
  • Smith, H., and R.T. Dean. 2009. Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts.
  • Stagg, A. 2021. The ecology of the open practitioner: A conceptual framework for open research. Open Praxis 9, no. 4: 363–71. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.9.4.662.
  • Stagg, A. 2022. “The Ecology of Open Educational Practices in Australian higher education: a practitioner-focused mixed methods study”, (PhD Thesis, Tasmanian Institute for Learning and Teaching), 255-258. University of Tasmania.
  • Stagg, A., L. Nguyen, C. Bossu, H. Partridge, J. Funk, and K. Judith. 2018. Open educational practices in Australia: A first-phase national audit of higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19, no. 3.
  • Stagg, A., H. Partridge, C. Bossu, J. Funk, and N. Linh. 2022. Engaging with open educational practices: mapping the landscape in Australian higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 1–15. doi:10.14742/ajet.8016.
  • Sullivan, G. 2009. Chapter 2 making space: The purpose and place of practice-led research. In Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts,41–65. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.1515/9780748636303-003
  • UNESCO. 2016. Education for people and planet: creating sustainable futures for all Global education monitoring report. https://doi.org/10.54676/AXEQ8566.
  • UNESCO. 2023a. The Right to Education. June 26. https://www.unesco.org/en/right-education.