Embracing hybridity: the affordances of arts-based research for the professional doctorate in education

References

• Atabay, K., E. Cravalho, J. Demirbag, E. Pua Ka’ai, A. Kaneshiro, and S. Nakasato. 2017. The EdD cohort experience: Students’ reflection on the program. Educational Perspectives 49, no. 1: 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Borkoski, C., and B. Roos. 2021. Listening to and crafting stories: Cultivating activism in online doctoral students. Impacting Education: Journal of Transformational Professional Practice 6, no. 1: 33–6.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and A. Lee. 2009. Introduction. In Changing practices of doctoral education, eds. D. Boud, and A. Lee, 1–9. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and A. Lee. 2009. “Introduction.” In Changing practices of doctoral education, edited by D. Boud and A. Lee, 1–9. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. 2018. The stifling silence around scholarly creativity in doctoral education: Experiences of students and supervisors in four disciplines. Higher Education 75: 655–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., T. Dragovic, K. Ottewell, and W. Lim. 2018. Voicing the professional doctorate and the researching professional’s identity: Theorizing the EdD’s uniqueness. London Review of Education 16, no. 1: 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, E., R. Heaton, S. Swidler, and S. Wunder. 2014. Examining CPED cohort dissertations: A window into the learning of EdD students. Planning and Changing 44, no. 3: 266–85.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, G., N. Gerber, and V. Scotti. 2015. Towards an aesthetic intersubjective paradigm for arts based research. Critical Approaches to Arts-Based Research 5, no. 1: 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. 2022. Methodological becoming: Doctoral students’ perceptions of their methodological journeys. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 13, no. 1: 36–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley, C. 2013. Evaluation of the current status and knowledge contributions of professional doctorates. Quality in Higher Education 19, no. 1: 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, L. 2016. Understanding high-impact research through mode 1 and mode 2 research approaches. InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact 6, no. 2: 165.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A., K. Chandler, and D. Punthil. 2023. Practice and the professional doctorate: A diffractive re-reading (2023). Journal of Further and Higher Education 47, no. 3: 364–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, T. 2022. “A structure that other people are directing”: Doctoral students’ writing of qualitative theses in education. The Qualitative Report 27, no. 4: 997–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragovic, T. 2016. The art and craft of professional doctorates. In Transformative doctoral research practices for professionals, edited by P. Burnard, T. Dragovic, J. Flutter, and J. Alderton, 61–74. Leiden (The Netherlands): Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, P., and L. Heath. 2011. Practitioner research at doctoral level – developing coherent research methodologies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feilzer, Y.M. 2010. Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4, no. 1: 6–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, D. 2006. The professional doctorate: Its relativity to the PhD and relevance for the knowledge economy. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 1, no. 1: 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, H.A., S. Chesnut, J. Thomas, and C. Robinson. 2023. Differentiating the EdD and the PhD in higher education: A survey of characteristics and trends. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice 8, no. 1: 18–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K., and M. Gergen. 2018. The performative movement in social science. In Handbook of arts-based research, edited by P. Leavy, 54–67. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwatzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, V.P. 2013. Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A's framework. Review of General Psychology 17, no. 1: 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas. 2012. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.W. 2009. The case for a modern doctor of education degree (EdD): Multipurpose education doctorates no longer appropriate. Peabody Journal of Education 84, no. 1: 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, D., and S. Yerrabati. 2018. A systematic review of research on professional doctorates. London Review of Education 16, no. 1: 10–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, R., N. LeBlanc, J. Ryu, and G. Belliveau. 2018. A/r/togrpahy as living inquiry. In Handbook of arts-based research, edited by P. Leavy, 37–53. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2018. Contemporary trends in professional doctorates. Studies in Higher Education 43, no. 5: 814–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, R. 2017. Affirming the artist practitioner researcher. Educational Perspectives 49, no. 1: 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, G., and C. Cole. 2008. Handbook of the arts in qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. 2022. Clearing the clouds: Finding motivation and clarity in non-traditional dissertation in using arts-based educational research (ABER). Impacting Education: Journal of Transformational Professional Practice 6, no. 1: 20–5.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. 2018a. Fiction-based research. In Handbook of arts-based research, edited by P. Leavy, 190–207. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. 2018b. Introduction to arts-based research. In Handbook of arts-based research, edited by P. Leavy, 3–21. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren-Resenterra, M., and P.E. Kahn. 2019. The organisational impact of undertaking a professional doctorate: Forming critical leaders. British Educational Research Journal 45, no. 2: 407–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. 2003. From first to second generation professional doctorate. Studies in Higher Education 28, no. 3: 279–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, L.P., and D.H. Ortloff. 2004. Reforming the doctorate in education: Three conceptions. Educational Perspectives 37, no. 2: 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, D., B. Hooker, D. Wise, and L. Devlin. 2010. Supporting professional learning through teacher educator enquiries: An ethnographic insight into developing understandings and changing identities. Professional Development in Education 36, no. 1-2: 169–95.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, S. 2018. Philosophical and practical foundations of artistic inquiry. In Handbook of arts-based research, edited by P. Leavy, 22–36. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., M.D.J. Peters, C. Stern, C. Tufanaru, A. McArthur, and E. Aromataris. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology 18, no. 1: 143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J.A. 2012. What history reveals about the education doctorate. Placing practitioner knowledge at the center of teacher education: Rethinking the policies and practices of the education doctorate, 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). 2020. Characteristics Statement: Doctoral Degree. Accessed June 1, 2023. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/doctoral-degree-characteristics-statement-2020.pdf?sfvrsn=a3c5ca81_14.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. 2018. The landscape of professional doctorate provision in English higher education institutions: Inconsistencies, tensions and unsustainability. London Review of Education 16, no. 1: 90–103.
   Google Scholar
• Rolling, J. 2010. A paradigm analysis of arts-based research and implications for education. Studies in Art Education 51, no. 2: 102–14.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, W., and A. Olejniczak. 2022. More journal articles and fewer books: Publication practices in the social sciences in the 2010s. PLoS One 17, no. 2): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savva, M., and L.P. Nygaard. 2021. Becoming a Scholar: Cross-cultural reflections on identity and agency in an education doctorate. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., A. Brown, and I. Lunt. 2004. Professional doctorates: Integrating academic and professional knowledge: Integrating academic and professional knowledge. London: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., M. Malloch, L. Cairns, and C. Costley. 2004, November. Towards a third generation of professional doctorates managed by the learners themselves. In Deakin conference on professional doctorates, 25–6. Melbourne: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, M. 2004. Doctoring the knowledge worker. Studies in Continuing Education 26, no. 3: 431–41.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, R. 2002. A diversity of doctorates: Fitness for the knowledge economy? Higher Education Research and Development 21, no. 2: 143–53.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, S. 2021. Practice submissions – are doctoral regulations and policies responding to the needs of creative practice? Research in Post-Compulsory Education 26, no. 3: 333–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildy, H., S. Peden, and K. Chan. 2015. The rise of professional doctorates: Case studies of the Doctorate in Education in China, Iceland and Australia. Studies in Higher Education 40, no. 5: 761–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. 2017. The contemporary research degree: Whose project is it anyway? Non Traditional Research Outcomes. https://nitro.edu.au/edition-24.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., and G. Robinson. 2014. Experiences of the creative doctorate: Minstrels and white lines. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning 2, no. 2: 49–67.
   Google Scholar