How does GenAI affect trust in teacher-student relationships? Insights from students’ assessment experiences

References

• Adams, C.M. 2014. Collective student trust: A social resource for urban elementary students. Educational Administration Quarterly 50, no. 1: 135–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., and R. Ajjawi. 2023. Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology 54, no. 5: 1160–1173.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2009. Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34, no. 1: 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2013. Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In Feedback in higher and professional education, edited by D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 90–103. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, A.J., X. Chen, M. Bathgate, J. Frederick, D.I. Hanauer, and M.J. Graham. 2018. Trust, growth mindset, and student commitment to active learning in a college science course. CBE—Life Sciences Education 17, no. 1: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C.K.Y. 2023. A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20, no. 1: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C.K.Y., and K.K.W. Lee. 2023. The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments 10, no. 1: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fawns, T., and S. Schaepkens. 2022. A matter of trust: Online proctored exams and the integration of technologies of assessment in medical education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 34, no. 4: 444–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felten, P., R. Forsyth, and K.A. Sutherland. 2023. Building trust in the classroom: A conceptual model for teachers, scholars, and academic developers in higher education. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 11: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, A.G. 2023, April 3. We tested a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/01/chatgpt-cheating-detection-turnitin/.
   Google Scholar
• Gorichanaz, T. 2023. Accused: How students respond to allegations of using ChatGPT on assessments. Learning: Research and Practice 9, no. 2: 183–96. doi:10.1080/23735082.2023.2254787.
   Google Scholar
• Gratiot, C. (Host). 2023, April 26. AI and the erosion of trust in Higher Ed. [Podcast episode]. In The Bravery Media. https://bravery.co/podcast/ai-and-erosion-of-trust-in-higher-ed/.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W.K., and M. Tschannen-Moran. 1999. Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership 9, no. 3: 184–208.
   Google Scholar
• Kovač, V.B., and A. Kristiansen. 2010. Trusting trust in the context of higher education: The potential limits of the trust concept. Power and Education 2, no. 3: 276–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kramm, N., and S. McKenna. 2023. AI amplifies the tough question: What is higher education really for? Teaching in Higher Education 28, no. 8: 2173–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.J. 2007. The relations between the student–teacher trust relationship and school success in the case of Korean middle schools. Educational Studies 33, no. 2: 209–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legard, R., J. Keegan, and K. Ward. 2003. In-depth interviews. In Qualitative research practice: A guide for social research students and researchers, eds. J. Ritchie, and J. Lewis, 138–69. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, J.M., K. Thompson, and L. Corrin. 2023. Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 39, no. 1: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J. 2024. A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J., and C.K.Y. Chan. 2023. Conceptualising evaluative judgement in the context of holistic competency development: Results of a Delphi study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48, no. 4: 513–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2009. A leap of faith: The role of trust in higher education teaching. Nagoya Journal of Higher Education 9, no. 14: 221–38.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2022. The distrust of students as learners: Myths and realities. In Trusting in higher education: A multifaceted discussion of trust in and for higher education in Norway and the United Kingdom, edited by Paul Gibbs and Peter Maassen, 89–100. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.M., L. Kensler, and M. Tschannen-Moran. 2018. Student trust in teachers and student perceptions of safety: Positive predictors of student identification with school. International Journal of Leadership in Education 21, no. 2: 135–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, A.L., C. Stone, and R. Bennett. 2022. Conceptualising and building trust to enhance the engagement and achievement of under-served students. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education 71, no. 2: 134–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plé, L. 2023, September 22. Should we trust students in the age of generative AI? Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/should-we-trust-students-age-generative-ai.
   Google Scholar
• Reina, D.S., and M.L. Reine. 2006. Trust and betrayal in the workplace: Building effective relationships in your organization. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Roffey, S. 2012. Pupil wellbeing—teacher wellbeing: Two sides of the same coin? Educational and Child Psychology 29, no. 4: 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., and H. Macleod. 2018. Surveillance, (dis) trust and teaching with plagiarism detection technology. In 11th international conference on networked learning, edited by M. Bajić, N. Dohn, M. de Laat, P. Jandrić, and T. Ryberg, 235–42. Zagreb: Zagreb University of Applied Sciences. https://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/papers/ross_25.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J. 2023. ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 6, no. 1: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., C. O’Neill, G. Smith, M. Andrejevic, and X. Gu. 2021. A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities. Media International Australia 186, no. 1: 149–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol, D. 2023, July 10. It is too easy to falsely accuse a student of using AI: A cautionary tale. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/it-too-easy-falsely-accuse-student-using-ai-cautionary-tale.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., R.A. Bankole, R.M. Mitchell, and D.M. Moore. 2013. Student academic optimism: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Administration 51, no. 2: 150–75.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, J., and J. Faubert. 2009. Framing experience: Concept maps, mind maps, and data collection in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8, no. 3: 68–83.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. 2023, July 25. Turnitin says one in 10 university essays are partly AI-written. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/turnitin-says-one-10-university-essays-are-partly-ai-written.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z. 2023. Towards a new definition of trust for teaching in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 17, no. 2: 1–13.
   Google Scholar