Challenging the visual: learning from the mobility narratives of visually impaired persons

References

• Adams, M., and S. Guy. 2007. “Senses and the City.” The Senses and Society 2: 133–136. doi:10.2752/174589307X203047.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Information Group (AIG). 2008. Legible London: Interim Design Standard Version 1.0. London: AIG.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, C., R. Imrie, and K. Kullman. 2016. Care and Design: Bodies, Buildings, Cities. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. L. 2016. “The Role of Fluctuating Soundscapes in Shaping the Emotional Geographies of Individuals Living with Ménière’s Disease.” Social & Cultural Geography, 18: 831–850. doi:10.1080/14649365.2016.1228116.
   Google Scholar
• Benktzon, M. 1993. “Designing for Our Future Selves: The Swedish Experience.” Applied Ergonomics 24: 19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. 2012. “The Problem with Thinking about or for Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 17: 1–20. doi:10.1080/13574809.2011.646251.
   Google Scholar
• Bild, E., M. Coler, K. Pfeffer, and L. Bertolini. 2016. “Considering Sound in Planning and Designing Public Spaces: A Review of Theory and Applications and A Proposed Framework for Integrating Research and Practice.” Journal of Planning Literature 31: 419–434. doi:10.1177/0885412216662001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boys, J. 2016. “Architecture, Place and the ‘Care‐Full’ Design of Everyday Life.” In: Care and Design: Bodies, Buildings, Cities, edited by C. Bates, R. Imrie, and K. Kullman, 155–177. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cerwén, G. 2016. “Urban Soundscapes: A Quasi-Experiment in Landscape Architecture.” Landscape Research 41: 481–494. doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1117062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard, V., E. Hall, and R. Wilton. 2010. Towards Enabling Geographies: ‘Disabled’ Bodies and Minds in Society and Space. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S., P. Pinch, and S. Reimer. 2017. “Legible London: Mobilising the Pedestrian.” In Mobilising Design, edited by J. Spinney, S. Reimer, and P. Pinch. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, G. 1961. Townscape. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, G. 1971. The Concise Townscape. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J., and V. L. Henderson. 2016. “The Sensory City: Autism, Design and Care.” In Care and Design: Bodies, Buildings, Cities, edited by C. Bates, R. Imrie, and K. Kullman. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DeLyser, D., and D. Sui. 2013. “Crossing the Qualitative-Quantitative Chasm III Enduring Methods, Open Geography, Participatory Research, and the Fourth Paradigm.” Progress in Human Geography 37: 293–305. doi: 10.1177/0309132512444063.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2016. “The Social Life of the Senses: Ordering and Disordering the Modern Sensorium.” In A Cultural History of the Senses in the Modern Age, edited by D. Howes. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Fendley, T. 2015. What's Next for Legible Cities? https://segd.org/what-next-legible-cities
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 1987. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. [trans by Jo Koch, Van Nostrand]. Reinholds: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, B. E. 2014. “Parallels and Problems of Normalization in Rehabilitation and Universal Design: Enabling Connectivities.” Disability and Rehabilitation 36: 1328–1333. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.891661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S. 2000. Universal Design: A Manual of Practical Guidance for Architects. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greed, C. 2003. Public Toilets: Inclusive Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, V., and C. Musselwhite. 2013. “The Attitudes, Perceptions and Concerns of Pedestrians and Vulnerable Road Users to Shared Space: A Case Study from the UK.” Journal of Urban Design 18: 78–97. doi:10.1080/13574809.2012.739549.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, S. 2014. An Alternative Age-Friendly Handbook. Manchester: University of Manchester Library.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, S. 2016. “Ageing, Care and the Practice of Urban Curating.” In Care and Design: Bodies, Buildings, Cities, edited by C. Bates, R. Imrie, and K. Kullman. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, S. 2017. “Resistant Sitting.” In Disability, Space, Architecture: A Reader, edited by J. Boys. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, J. 2008. “Coming of Age.” Journal of Aging Studies 22: 109–114. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2007.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw, V. 2014. “Beyond Smelly: Why City Streets are Becoming Sensory Depravation Zones.” New Scientist 222: 28–29. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(14)61111-8.
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen, A., and J. Herssens. 2014. “Designerly Ways of Not Knowing: What Designers Can Learn about Space from People Who are Blind.” Journal of Urban Design 19: 317–332. doi:10.1080/13574809.2014.890042.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. 2017. Women and Equalities Committee. Building for Equality: Disability and the Built Environment. Ninth Report of Session 2016–17. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmwomeq/631/63102.htm
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and E. Street. 2009. “Regulating Design: The Practices of Architecture, Governance and Control.” Urban Studies 46: 2507–2518. doi:10.1177/0042098009346068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and P. Hall. 2001. Inclusive Design: Developing and Designing Accessible Environments. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1993. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, R. 1980. “Urban Environments as Visual Art or as Social Settings?” Town Planning Review 51: 50. doi:10.3828/tpr.51.1.f3714335ku0x98r2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries, J., and P. Wright. 2017. “Border Crossings: Exploring Artefacts of Mobility with Blind and Visually Impaired Users.” In Mobilising Design, edited by J. Spinney, S. Reimer, and P. Pinch. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2014. Designing Mobilities. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. M. 1998. “‘Out of Place’,’Knowing One’s Place’: Space, Power and the Exclusion of Disabled People.” Disability & Society 13: 343–356. doi:10.1080/09687599826678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. M. 2000. “The Researched Opinions on Research: Disabled People and Disability Research.” Disability & Society 15: 25–47. doi:10.1080/09687590025757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J. 2006. Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1972. What Time Is This Place? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, H. 2009. “Articulating Blind Touch: Thinking through the Feet.” The Senses and Society 4: 179–193. doi:10.2752/174589309X425120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ONS. 2017. Overview of the UK Population. July 2017. Office for National Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/july2017#the-uks-population-is-getting-older-but-its-not-the-same-in-all-areas-of-the-uk. Accessed August 29th 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R. 2004. “Social Geography: Participatory Research.” Progress in Human Geography 28: 652–663. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph511pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, J., and N. Smithies. 2012. “Accountinsg for the Needs of Blind and Visually Impaired People in Public Realm Design.” Journal of Urban Design 17: 135–149. doi:10.1080/13574809.2012.646139.
   Google Scholar
• Peace, S. 2016. “Age‐Inclusive Design: A Challenge for Kithen Living?” In Care and Design: Bodies, Buildings, Cities, edited by C. Bates, R. Imrie, and K. Kullman. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Porteous, J. D. 1996. Environmental Aesthetics: Ideas, Politics and Planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• RCOphth & RNIB. 2016. Understading Charles Bonnet Syndrome. London. Royal College of Ophthalmologists and Royal National Institute of Blind People. https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RCOphth-RNIB-Understanding-Charles-Bonnet-Syndrome-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• RNIB. 2016. Sight Loss Data Tool. https://www.rnib.org.uk/professionals/knowledge-and-research-hub/key-information-and-statistics/sight-loss-data-tool
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, J. A. 2012. Universal Design as a Rehabilitation Strategy: Design for the Ages. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1998. “The Sense of Touch.” Architectural Design 68: 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, A., P. Kjell, and R. Potts. 2005. Clone Town Britain: The Survey Results on the Bland State of the Nation. M. Murphy ed. London: New Economics Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Steels, S. 2015. “Key Characteristics of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: A Review.” Cities 47: 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VISION2020. 2016. “VISION 2020 UK Response to the Disability and the Built Environment Inquiry 2016.” In VISION 2020: The Right to Sight (UK), edited by W. A. E. Committee. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/women-and-equalities-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/disability-and-the-built-environment-16-17/
   Google Scholar
• Winance, M. 2014. “Universal Design and the Challenge of Diversity: Reflections on the Principles of UD, Based on Empirical Research of People’s Mobility.” Disability and Rehabilitation 36: 1334–1343. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.936564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar