Towards Parity in Protection: Barriers to Effective Child Protection and Welfare Assessment with Disabled Children in the Republic of Ireland

References

• Adams, J., & Leshone, D. (2016). Active social work with children with disabilities. St Albans: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Angus, J., & Bowen-Obsorne, S. (2014). A self-narrative of life-long disability: A reflection on resilience and living with dementia. Dementia (basel, Switzerland), 13(2), 47–159.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, C. (2010). Assessment & intervention in social work: Preparing for practice. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. (2003). Safeguarding adults and children with disabilities against abuse. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., & Miller, M. (2013). Holding a vision: An investigation of a rights based social supports infrastructure for children/young people with an intellectual disability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National University of Ireland Galway, Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K. (2012). Strengthening the retention of child protection workers: Career preferences, exchange relationships and employment mobility. Bremen: EHV Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., & Alastair, C. (2013). Employment mobility or turnover? An analysis of child welfare and protection employee retention. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(2), 340–346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, K., & MacCarthy, J. (2012). An impossible task? Implementing the recommendations of child abuse inquiry reports in a context of ‘high’ workloads in child protection and welfare. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 12(1), 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., & McGregor, C. (2019). Child protection and welfare systems in Ireland: Continuities and discontinuities of the present. In L. Merkel-Holguin, J. D. Fluke, & R. D. Krugman (Eds.), Child maltreatment series, vol 8: National systems of child protection (pp. 115–139). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, K. (2014). Dyadic interviewing: A technique valuing interdependence in interviews with individuals with intellectual disabilities. Qualitative Research, 14(4), 488–507. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113490718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2008a). Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society, 23(2), 151–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701841190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2008b). Refusing able(ness): A preliminary conversation about ableism. M/C – Media and Culture, 11(3), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2014). Ableism as transformative practice. In C. Cocker & T. Hafford Letchfield (Eds.), Rethinking anti -discriminatory and anti -oppressive theories for social work practice (pp. 78–92). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2018). Refocusing on the paradigm shift from disability to studies in ableism. In A. Ghai (Ed.), Disability in south Asia: Knowledge and experience (pp. 39–57). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2019). Precision ableism: A studies in ableism approach to developing histories of disability and abledment. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, 23(2), 138–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2019.1607475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Care Act. (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Children First Act. (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, P. (2016). Preventing abuse and neglect in the lives of disabled children. Illinois: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Degener, T. (2016). A human rights model of disability. In P. Blanck & E. Flynn (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability law and human rights (pp. 31–49). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Children and Youth Affairs. (2012). Life as a child and young person in Ireland: Report of a national consultation. Dublin: Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Children and Youth Affairs. (2017). Children first: National guidance for the protection and welfare of children. Dublin: Department of Children and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive practice in context. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates (2nd ed., pp.3–19). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dyke, C. (2019). Writing analytical assessments in social work (2nd ed.). St Albans: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Harold, S., & Kilcummins, G. (2012). Access to justice for people with disabilities as victims of crime in Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/academic/law/ccjhr/publicationsseptember2018/ AccesstoJusticeforPeoplewithDisabilitiesasVictimsofCrimeinIreland2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, E. (2018, August 30). 450,000 child protection and welfare cases now accessible in new Tusla IT system.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, E. (2004). Poverty and children with intellectual disabilities in the world’s richer countries. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 29(4), 319–338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250400014491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, E., Shatahmasebi, S., Lancaster, G., & Berridge, D. (2010). Poverty transitions among families supporting a child with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 5(4), 224–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2010.518562
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. (2017). Perspectives on austerity: The impact of the economic recession on children with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 32(5), 678–700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1310086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. (2019). Rethinking Debates in Narrative methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and research challenges with children with intellectual disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. Retrieved from https://www.sjdr.se/articles/10.16993/sjdr.613/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, S., & McGregor (2018). Recessionary tales: an investigation into how intellectually disabled young people, and their families, experienced the economic downturn (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/sflynn/Downloads/Thesis%201.7%20(12).pdf (http://hdl.handle.net/10379/14562)
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S., & McGregor, C. (2017). Disabled children and child protection: Learning from literature through a Non-tragedy Lens. Child Care in Practice, 23(3), 258–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2016.1259157
   Google Scholar
• Gartland, F. (2017, August 7). Multiple interviewing in child abuse cases can ‘re-traumatise’ victims. The Irish Times. Retrieved from https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crimeand-law/multiple-interviewing-in-child-abuse-cases-can-re-traumatise-victims1.3109879?mode=sample&auth-failed=1&pworigin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.irishtimes.com%2Fnews%2Fcrime-andlaw%2Fmultiple-interviewing-in-child-abuse-cases-can-re-traumatise-victims1.3109879
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, L., & Heather, S. (2015). Research involving people with a learning disability: Methodological challenges and ethical considerations. Journal of Research in Nursing, 20(6), 435–446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987115591867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2009). Foreword. In F. K. Campbell (Ed.), Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness (pp. ix–xiii). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability and Society, 28(5), 631–644. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2016). Disability studies. An interdisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Runswick, C. K. (2014). Posthuman disability studies. Subjectivity, 7(4), 342–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2014.15
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2012). Irish social work and social care law. Dublin: Gill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., & Swain, J. (2009). Disability and child sexual abuse: Lessons from survivors’ narratives for effective protection, prevention and treatment. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (2014). The compleat social worker. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of the social work profession. Retrieved from https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-socialwork/global-definition-of-social-work/
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B. (2007). Methodological issues for learning disabled children. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(1), 21–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600655159
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., & Dowling, S. (2015). Safeguarding disabled children and young people: A scoping exercise of statutory child protection services for disabled children and young people in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Queens University and Safeguarding Board for Northern.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Dowling, S., & Winter, K. (2012). Disabled children and young people who are looked after: A literature review. Northern Ireland: OFMDFM & QUB.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Dowling, S., & Winter, K. (2014). A review of the policy context in relation to looked after disabled children and young people in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland: OFMDFM & QUB.
   Google Scholar
• Kilkelly, U. (2013). Children's rights in Ireland: Law, policy and practice. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Laming, L. (2003). The Victoria Climbié inquiry: Report of an inquiry. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, T. D. (2014). Interviewing children. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 73–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, D. (1999). Disability: Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness, C. (1993). Report of the Kilkenny incest investigation. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M., & Obsorne, C. (2009). Safeguarding disabled children: Practice guidance. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Advisory Committee on Drugs. (2011). Parental substance misuse: Addressing its impact on children: A review of the literature. Dublin: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, M. (2008). Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: Methodological challenges. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/491/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1983). Social work with disabled people. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 31(2), 1024–1026. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Sapey, B. (1999). Social work with disabled people. Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., Sapey, B., & Thomas, P. (2012). Social work with disabled people (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Quin, S., & Redmond, B. (2003). Disability and social policy in Ireland. Dublin: University of Dublin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, M., & Antaki, C. (1998). A conversation analysis of the ‘acquiescence’ of people with learning difficulties. Applied Social Psychology, 6(3), 207–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199608)6:3<207::AID-CASP370>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, A. (2010). Safeguarding and protecting children with disabilities and SEN. London: Optimus Education ebooks.
   Google Scholar
• Revill, P., Ryan, P., McNamara, A., & Normand, C. (2013). A cost and outcomes analysis of alternative models of care for young children with severe disabilities in Ireland. ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap, 7(4), 260–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2013.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Roscommon Child Care Inquiry. (2010). Roscommon child care case: Report of the inquiry team to the health service Executive. Dublin: Health Service Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2018). Social work practice across disability (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sainero, A., De Valle, J. F., Lopez, M., & Bravo, A. (2013). Exploring the specific needs of an understudied group: Children with intellectual disability in residential child care. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(9), 1393–1399. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, G. (2001). Children and the law. Dublin: Round Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Simcock, P., & Castle, R. (2016). Social work with disability. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, K., Booth, T., & Booth, W. (1989). Speaking out: User studies and people with learning difficulties. Research, Policy and Planning, 7(1), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Stalker, K. (1998). Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 13(1), 5–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalker, K., Green Lister, P., Lerpiniere, J., & McArthur, K. (2010). Child protection and the needs and rights of disabled children: Abridged report. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Faculty of Education/Sir Halley Stewart Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Stalker, K., & McArthur, K. (2012). Child abuse, child protection and disabled children: A review of recent research. Child Abuse Review, 21(2), 24–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., & Knutson, J. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(10), 1257–1273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00190-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590050058189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., Stalker, K., Fry, D., & Stewart, A. (2014). Disabled children and child protection in Scotland: An investigation into the relationship between professional practice, child protection and disability. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Children’s Rights and Wellbeing Division.
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, A., & Murphy, T. (2017). Signs of safety® comprehensive briefing paper (4th ed.). Australia: Resolutions Consultancy Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tusla. (2009). Child welfare and protection social work departments business processes, revision 0.9. Ireland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tusla. (2017). Business plan 2017. Retrieved from https://www.tusla.ie/uploads/content/Tusla__Child_and_Family_Agency_Business_Plan_2017.pdf United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities, 2006
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderminden, J., Cameron, A., Fry, D., & Lannen, P. (2017). Child protection and disability: Ethical, methodological and practical challenges for research. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. (2005). Research with children with disabilities: Guidelines and checklist for good practice. Dublin: N.D.A.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. (2006). Consulting with children with disabilities as service users: Practical and methodological considerations. Dublin: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar