Limb preference in the gallop of dogs and the half-bound of pikas on flat ground

References

• Bagesteiro , L. B. and Sainburg , R. L. 2002 . Handedness: Dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics . Journal of Neurophysiology , 88 : 2408 – 2421 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein , N. A. 1984 . “ Some emergent problems of the regulation of motor acts ” . In Human motor actions , Edited by: Whiting , H. T. A. 343 – 371 . Amsterdam : North-Holland/Elsevier .
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw , J. L. and Rogers , L. 1993 . The evolution of lateral asymmetries, Language, tool use and intellect , San Diego, CA : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Branson , N. J. and Rogers , L. J. 2006 . Relationship between paw preference strength and noise phobia in Canis familiaris . Journal of Comparative Psychology , 120 ( 3 ) : 176 – 183 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuel , N. R. and Lawrence , L. M. 1987 . Laterality in the gallop gait of horses . Journal of Biomechanics , 20 ( 66 ) : 645 – 649 .
   Google Scholar
• Fagot , J. and Vauclair , J. 1991 . Manual laterality in nonhuman primates: A distinction between handedness and manual specialization . Psychological Bulletin , 109 : 76 – 89 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer , M. S. and Blickhan , R. 2006 . The tri-segmented limbs of therian mammals: Kinematics, dynamics, self-stabilization – a review . Journal of Experimental Zoology , 305 ( 11 ) : 935 – 952 .
   Google Scholar
• Fischer , M. S. and Lehmann , R. 1998 . Application of cineradiography for the metric and kinematic study of in-phase gait during locomotion of the pika (Ochotona rufescens, Mammalia, Lagomorpha) . Zoology , 101 ( 3 ) : 148 – 173 .
   Google Scholar
• Fischer , M. S. , Schilling , N. , Schmidt , M. , Haarhaus , D. and Witte , H. F. 2002 . Basic limb kinematics of small therian mammals . Journal of Experimental Biology , 205 : 1315 – 1338 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambaryan , P. P. 1974 . How mammals run: Anatomical adaptations , New York : John Wiley & Son .
   Google Scholar
• Hackert , R. 2003 . Dynamics of the pikas’ half-bound – Spinal flexion contributes to dynamic stability . PhD Thesis, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany .
   Google Scholar
• Hook , M. A. and Rogers , L. J. 2002 . Leading-limb preference in marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): Walking, leaping and landing? . Laterality , 7 : 145 – 162 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins , W. D. 1995 . Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task in 110 chimpanzees: Cross-sectional analysis . Journal of Comparative Psychology , 109 : 291 – 297 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji , Q. , Luo , Z-X. , Yuan , C-X. , Wible , J. R. , Zhang , J-P. and Georgi , J. A. 2002 . The earliest eutherian mammal . Nature , 416 : 816 – 822 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malashichev , Y. B. 2006 . One-sided limb preference is linked to alternating-limb locomotion in anuran amphibians . Journal of Comparative Psychology , 120 ( 4 ) : 401 – 410 .
   Google Scholar
• Meunier , H. and Vauclair , J. 2007 . Hand preferences on unimanual and bimanual tasks in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) . American Journal of Primatology , 69 ( 9 ) : 1064 – 1069 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyser , F. , Caldwell , C. and Cobb , M. 2006 . Dog paw preference shows lability and sex differences . Behavioural Processes , 73 ( 2 ) : 216 – 221 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaranta , A. , Siniscalchi , M. , Frate , A. and Villortigara , G. 2004 . Paw preference in dogs: Relations between lateralised behaviour and immunity . Behavioural Brain Research , 153 : 521 – 525 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers , L. J. and Andrew , R. J. 2002 . Comparative vertebrate lateralisation: The evolution of brain lateralisation , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Seyfarth , A. , Geyer , H. and Blickhan , R. 2002 . A movement criterion for running . Journal of Biomechanics , 35 : 649 – 655 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfarth , A. , Geyer , H. and Herr , H. 2003 . Swing-leg retraction: A simple control model for stable running . Journal of Experimental Biology , 206 : 2547 – 2555 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinozzi , G. , Castorina , M. G. and Truppa , V. 1998 . Hand preferences in unimanual and coordinated bimanual tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) . Journal of Comparative Psychology , 112 : 183 – 191 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan , U. 1987 . Paw preferences in dogs . International Journal of Neuroscience , 32 : 825 – 829 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan , U. , Yaprak , M. and Kutlu , N. 1990 . Paw preference in cats: Distribution and sex differences . International Journal of Neuroscience , 50 ( 3–4 ) : 195 – 208 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallortigara , G. and Bisazza , A. 2002 . “ How ancient is brain lateralisation? ” . In Comparative vertebrate lateralisation: The evolution of brain lateralisation , Edited by: Rogers , L. J. and Andrew , R. J. 9 – 69 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Vallortigara , G. , Rogers , L. J. and Bisazza , A. 1999 . Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralisation . Brain Research Reviews , 30 : 164 – 175 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alphen , A. , Bosse , T. , Frank , I. , Jonker , C.M. and Koeman , F. 2005 . “ Paw preference correlates to task performance in dogs ” . In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci'05 , Edited by: Bara , B. G. , Barsalou , L. and Bucciarelli , M. 2248 – 2253 . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Walter , R. M. and Carrier , D. R. 2007 . Ground forces applied by galloping dogs . Journal of Experimental Biology , 210 : 208 – 216 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells , D. L. 2003 . Lateralised behaviour in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris . Behavioural Processes , 61 ( 1–2 ) : 27 – 35 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar