Exploring mental representations of prospective teachers about gifted education using associative group analysis

References

• Akgül, G. (2021). Teachers’ metaphors and views about gifted students and their education. Gifted Education International, 37(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429421988927
   Google Scholar
• Allotey, G. A., Watters, J. J., & King, D. (2020). Ghanian science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about gifted education strategies. Gifted Education International, 36(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420946732
   Google Scholar
• Al Makhalid, K. A. (2012). Primary teachers’ attitudes and knowledge regarding gifted pupils and their education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ( doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, School of Education,
   Google Scholar
• Antoun, M., Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2022). Gifted education in Lebanon: Time to rethink teaching the gifted. Roeper Review, 44(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2043502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, S. K., Bliss, S. L., Choate, S. M., & Sager Brown, K. (2007). Serving children who are gifted: Perceptions of undergraduates planning to become teachers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(4), 450–478. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2007-506
   Google Scholar
• Baudson, T. G. (2016). The mad genius stereotype: Still alive and well. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and average-ability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0016986216647115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergold, S., Hastall, M. R., & Steinmayr, R. (2021). Do mass media shape stereotypes about intellectually gifted individuals? Two experiments on stigmatization effects from biased newspaper reports. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220969393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergold, S., Wirthwein, L. D., H, R., & Steinmayr, R. (2015). Are gifted adolescents more satisfied with their lives than their non-gifted peers? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco, M., & Leech, N. L. (2010). Twice-exceptional learners: Effects of teacher preparation and disability labels on gifted referrals. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 33(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409356392
   Google Scholar
• Boben, D. 2012. Smo psihologi (edini) kompetentni za identifikacijo nadarjenih? [Are psychologists (the only ones) competent to identify gifted students?]. In M. Juriševič & B. Stritih (Eds.), Posvetovanje Vloga psihologa v vzgoji in izobraževanju nadarjenih, 27. 1. 2012 (pp. 57–76). Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta.
   Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., & Wänke, M. (2002). Attitudes and attitude change. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, R. J., Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2019). Do teachers have different mental representations of relationships with children in cases of children in cases of hyperactivity versus conduct problems? School Psychology Review, 48(4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2018-0086.V48-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, S., Pianta, R. C., & Marvin, R. S. (2001). Mothers’ representations of relationships with their children: Relations with parenting behaviour, mother characteristics, and child disability status. Social Development, 10(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Hesslinger, V. M. (2013). Attitudes and cognitive distances: On the non-unitary and flexible nature of cognitive maps. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0140-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, C. A.(2011). Stereotypes of giftedness in current and future educators. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(5), 790–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211417340
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L. (2018). On the social and emotional lives of gifted children. Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L., Cross, R. J., & O’Reilly, C. (2018). Attitudes about gifted education among Irish educators. High Ability Studies, 29(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1518775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, A. T., Kunter, M., & Voss, T. (2015). The relationship between quality of discourse during teacher induction classes and beginning teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0227-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471–495). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Flynt, E. S., & Brozo, W. G. (2009). It’s all about the teacher. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 536–538. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.6.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (2010). Gifted lives: What happens when gifted children grow up. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2007). Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the perspective of the APE model. Social Cognition, 25(5), 687–717. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godor, B. P. (2019). Gifted metaphors: Exploring the metaphors of teachers in gifted education and their impact on teaching the gifted. Roeper Review, 41(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1553219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (Vol. 2). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J.-L. (2015). Cultivating teacher thinking: Ideas and practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 14(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9184-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. (2018) . Public attitudes towards gifted education. Institute for Educational Advancement.
   Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M. (2011). Gifted education. In J. Krek & M. Metljak (Eds.), White paper on education in the republic of Slovenia 2011 (pp. 329–367). Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo.
   Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M. (2012a). Inkluzivna edukacija nadarjenih učencev v kontekstu izobraževanja učiteljev [Inclusive education of gifted students in the context of teacher education]. In D. Hozjan & M. Strle (Eds.), Inkluzija v sodobni šoli [Inclusion in the modern school] (pp. 253–268).Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče, Univerzitetna založba Annales.
   Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M. (2012b). Nadarjeni učenci v slovenski šoli [Gifted students in the Slovenian school]. Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta.
   Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M. (2018). Zmorem in hočem več: nadarjen učenec pri pouku [I can and want more: A gifted student in class]. Fizika v šoli, 23(1), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M. (2020). Izobraževanje nadarjenih: analiza nacionalnega konteksta za popotnico v naslednje desetletje [Gifted and talented education: Analysis of the national context as a guide for the next decade]. Vzgoja in izobraževanje, 51(1–2), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M., & Worrell, F. C. (2019). Socio-emotional characteristics of gifted adolescents: Self-concept, personality, cognitive coping, and perfectionism. Proceedings of the XVI European Congress of Psychology (pp. 1222). Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Psychology. https://ecp2019.ru/doc/Book_of_Abstracts_ecp_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M., & Žerak, U. (2019). Attitudes towards gifted students and their education in the Slovenian context. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 4(12), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2019.0406
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419–469. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060003419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. M. (1985). The associative group analysis method and evaluation research. Evaluation Review, 9(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8500900103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettler, T., Russell, J., & Puryear, J. S. (2015). Inequitable access to gifted education: Variance in funding and staffing based on locale and contextual school variables. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215578277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, S., Hotulainen, R., & Tirri, K. (2019). Finish elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education. Roeper Review, 41(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1592794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, S., Kuusito, E., & Tirri, K. (2016). Finnish teachers’ conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassig, C. J.(2009). Teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted: the importance off professional development and school culture. Australian Journal of Gifted, 18(2), 32–42. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/32480/1/32480.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Loboda, M., Bedek, N., Žerak, U., Juriševič, M., & Vogrinc, J. (2020). Stališča študentov pedagoških smeri do nadarjenih in njihovega izobraževanja [Attitudes of pre-service teachers towards gifted pupils and their education]. Didactica Slovenica Pedagoška obzorja, 35(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Makarovič, J. (2002). Nadarjenost v psihološkem in družbenem kontekstu [Giftedness in a psychological and social context]. Didactica Slovenica Pedagoška obzorja, 17(2), 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mammadov, S. (2023). Personality profiles of gifted adolescents and relations with life satisfaction, perceived social support, and academic achievement. High Ability Studies, 34(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2022.2068509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheis, S., Keller, L. K., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M., & Preckel, F. (2019). Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and gender stereotypes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about student characteristics in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheis, S., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Treat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1537685
   Google Scholar
• Matrić, M., & Duh, M. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of gifted, talented and EBD students. Didactica Slovenica Pedagoška obzorja, 34(2), 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neihart, M. (2008). Identifying and providing services to twice exceptional children. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 115–137). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?. The National Association for Gifted Children.
   Google Scholar
• Neihart, M., & Yeo, L. S. (2018). Psychological issues unique to the gifted student. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 497–510). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-032
   Google Scholar
• Newen, A., & Vosgerau, G. (2020). Situated mental representations: Why we need mental representations and how we should understand them. In J. Smortchova, K. Dolega, & T. Schlicht (Eds.), What are mental representations? (pp. 178–212). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190686673.003.0007
   Google Scholar
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Worrell, F. C., & Subotnik, R. F. (2018). Addressing misconceptions about the talent development framework and implications for policy. In P. Olszewski-Kubilius, R. F. Subotnik, & F. C. Worrell (Eds.), Talent development as a framework for gifted education: Implications for best practices and application in schools (pp. 299–306). Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olthouse, J.(2014). How do preservice teachers conceptualize giftedness? A metaphor analysis. Roeper review, 36(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.884200
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan, D. (2016). Predictions and attitudes towards giftedness and gifted education. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(1–2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890521
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pergar Kuščer, M. (1998). Medkulturne razlike v vrednotah in vrednotnih usmeritvah študentov [Intercultural differences in students’ values and value orientations] ( doctoral dissertation). Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta.
   Google Scholar
• Perković Krijan, I., Jurčec, L., & Borić, E. (2015). Primary school teachers’ attitudes towards gifted students. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(3), 681–724. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v17i3.1199
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M., & Martin, S. S. (2003). Associative group analysis: A tobacco prevention case study. Social Marketing Quarterly, 9(2), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15245000309100
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (2002). Judgement and reasoning in the child. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B., & Stuhlman, M. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 199–234). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0710
   Google Scholar
• Pit-ten, C., M, I., & Glock, S. (2019). Teachers’ implicit attitudes toward students from different social groups: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Baudson, T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1160–1184. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215596413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A., Read, B., Pergar Kuščer, M., Fülöp, M., Pučko, C., Berkics, M., Sándor, M., & Hutchings, M. (2005). Teachers’ constructions of citizenship and enterprise: Using associative group analysis with teachers in Hungary, Slovenia and England. New Educational Review, 7(3–4), 111–139. https://www.educationalrev.us.edu.pl/dok/volumes/tner_3_2005.pdf#page=106
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C., Brigaud, E., Moliner, P., & Blanc, N. (2022). The social representations of gifted children in childhood professionals and the general adult population in France. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 45(2), 178–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532221085610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroth, S. T. & Helfer, J. A.(2009). Practitioners' conceptions of academic talent and giftedness: Essential factors in deciding classroom and school composition. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(3), 384–403. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1932202X0902000302
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Cognitive psychology (5th ed.). Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, S. B. (2018). Theories and conceptions of giftedness. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 29–47). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• SURS. (2021). V študijskem letu 2020/21 vpisanih 8 % več študentov kot v prejšnjem študijskem letu [ 8% more students enrolled in 2020/21 than in the previous academic year] https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/News/Index/9537
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, D. J., & Lord, E. W. (2013). Harnessing and guiding the power of policy: Examples from one state’s experiences. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(2), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0162353213480434
   Google Scholar
• Szalay, L. B., & Brent, J. E. (1967). The analysis of cultural meanings through free verbal associations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 72(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1967.9922313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski, A., Croft, L., & Godor, B. (2018). Determining attitudes toward ability: A new tool for new understanding. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1932202X17738989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofel-Grehl, C., & Callahan, C. M. (2017). STEM high school teachers’ belief regarding STEM student giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216673712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troxclair, D. A.(2013). Preservice teacher attitudes towards giftedness. Roeper review, 35(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.740603
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Gifted programs and services: What are the nonnegotiables? Theory into Practice, 44(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4402_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, H., Cumming, T. M., & O’Neill, S. (2022). South Korean pre-service primary school teachers’ opinions about acceleration for gifted students. Gifted and Talented International, 37(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2022.2097965
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, M., Chan, S., Chan, C., Fung, D. C., Cheung, W. M., Kwan, T., & Leung, F. K. (2018). Differentiation in key learning areas for gifted students in regular classes: A project for primary school teachers in Hong Kong. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416649047
   Google Scholar
• Žagar, D. (2012). Metodologija odkrivanja nadarjenih učencev v Sloveniji: zakaj tako in kaj spremeniti [Methodology for identifying gifted students in Slovenia: Why and what to change]. In M. Juriševič & B. Stritih (Eds.), Posvetovanje Vloga psihologa v vzgoji in izobraževanju nadarjenih, 27. 1. 2012 (pp. 19–26). Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidner, M., & Shani-Zinovich, I. (2011). Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the big-five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZOsn-H – Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o osnovni šoli [Act on Amendments and Supplements to the Elementary School Act]. (2011). http://pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO6129
   Google Scholar