156
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The relations of social competence and mental well-being by perception of giftedness in gifted students

ORCID Icon
Received 25 Jan 2023, Accepted 26 Dec 2023, Published online: 26 Jan 2024

References

  • Al-Kandari, H. A. (2023). Social intelligence skills of high school students at Sabah Al Ahmad Center for giftedness and creativity in the state of Kuwait and its relationship to some demographic variables. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.20448/ajssms.v10i1.4356
  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership, industry, military, & educational impact. Lowreance Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • Brody, N. (1997). Intelligence, schooling, and society. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1046
  • Burns, R. B. (1990). Introduction to research methods in education. Longman-Cheshire.
  • Cha, Y. (2016). 노벨문학상 수상자 109명의 영재성과 성취 및 명성 간의 관계 [Relationship of Giftedness, Achievement and Eminence with 109 Nobel Prize Laureates in Literature] [Doctoral dissertation, Soonchunhyang University]. Soonchunhyang DCollection. http://sch.dcollection.net/public_resource/pdf/000002300068_20230322172556.pdf
  • Chen, X., Fan, X., Cheung, H. Y., & Wu, J. (2018). The subjective well-being of academically gifted students in the Chinese cultural context. School Psychology International, 39(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318773788
  • Chen, X., Fan, X., Wu, J., & Cheung, H. Y. (2020). Factors related to suicidal cognitions of academically gifted students in the Chinese social-cultural context: An exploratory study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(3), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220923665
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  • Chowkase, A. A. (2022). A bioecological systems view of school experiences of high-ability students from rural India. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211030311
  • Chung, H. L., Monday, A., & Perry, A. (2017). Promoting the well-being of urban youth through drama-based peer education. American Journal of Health Behavior, 41(6), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.41.6.7
  • Cross, J. R., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x
  • Dwairy, M. (2004). Parenting styles and mental health of Arab gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800403
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Francis, R., Hawes, D. J., & Abbott, M. (2016). Intellectual giftedness and psychopathology in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598779
  • Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98–119). Cambridge University Press.
  • Garcia, D. (2011). Two models of personality and well-being among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1208–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.009
  • Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychological study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319704
  • Girard, S., Beland, S., Lemoyne, J., & Caron, P. O. (2020). Interpréter l’interaction de variables latentes: Une exemplification méthodologique de la méthode graphique Johnson-Neyman [Interpreting the interaction of latent variables: A methodological exemplification of the Johnson-Neyman graphical method]. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 46(2), 174–201. https://doi.org/10.7202/1073723ar
  • Guoyan, S., Khaskheli, A., Ali Raza, S., Khan, K. A., & Hakim, F. (2023). Teachers’ self-efficacy, mental well-being and continuance commitment of using learning management system during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study of Pakistan and Malaysia. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4652–4674. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1978503
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Han, K. S., & Kim, Y. M. (2008). 영재들은 행복한가?: 영재, 잠재적 영재, 일반학생의 행복관련 정서적 특성 비교 [The research on the gifted children’s happiness]. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18(3), 519–542. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200816256326633.page
  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hyun, J., Lim, S. H., Han, M. Y., Lim, H. J., & Son, K. W. (2014). KEDI 인성검사 실시요강(CRM2014-111) [KEDI character test implementation syllabus]. Korean Educational Development Institute. https://www.kedi.re.kr/khome/main/research/selectPubForm.do?plNum0=10062
  • IBM. (1989, 2022). SPSS statistics 29.0.0. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/spss-statistics/29.0.0
  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Pearson.
  • Jöreskog. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A. S. Goldberger & O. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85–112). Seminar Press.
  • Jung, K. S. (2021a). 영재학생과 일반학생의 정신적 안녕감과 정신병리 차이 분석 [Analysis of differences of mental well-being and mental psychopathology of gifted students and general students]. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum & Instruction, 21(14), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.14.129
  • Jung, K. S. (2021b). 영재학생이 지각한 영재성 수준에 따른 정신건강, 인성, 교육적합성, 부모 심리적 환경의 차이 분석 [Analysis of differences of mental health, virtue & competence, educational fit, and parental psychological environments by perceived giftedness of gifted students]. Journal of Education Science, 23(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.15564/jeju.2021.06.23.2.85
  • Jung, E. S., & Jung, J. W. (2017). 초등학생의 부모-자녀 의사소통, 교사-학생 의사소통과 학업성취의 관계: 자기결정성 학습동기의 매개효과 [The effect of parent-child and teacher-student communication perceived by elementary school student on self-determination motivation to learn and academic achievement]. Journal of Research in Education, 30(3), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.24299/kier.2017.30.3.77
  • Kahveci, N. G., & Akgul, S. (2019). The relationship between mathematical creativity and intelligence: A study on gifted and general education students. Gifted and Talented International, 34(1–2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2019.1693311
  • Kang, O. H. (2017). 스크래치를 활용한 LT 협동학습이 초등정보영재의 민주시민성에 미치는 영향 [Effects of LT cooperative learning applying scratch on democratic citizenship of gifted elementary students]. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 9(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.29306/jseg.2017.9.1.61
  • Keyes, C. L. M., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J. P., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.572
  • Khaskheli, A., Jiang, Y., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2022). Social isolation & toxic behavior of students in e-learning: Evidence during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2133145
  • Kim, D., & Lee, S. (2022). 초등영재 과학심화 프로그램 효과의 메타분석: 2000-2021 논문을 대상으로 [A meta-analysis of the effect of science enrichment programs for the gifted in elementary school in 2000-2021]. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 21(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.17839/jksgt.2022.21.1.51
  • Klein, A. G., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
  • Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. (2017, December 19). 영재교육 진흥법 [Gifted education promotion act]. https://www.law.go.kr/법령/영재교육진흥법
  • Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. (2020, September 12). 인성교육진흥법 [Character education promotion act]. https://www.law.go.kr/법령/인성교육진흥법
  • Korean Ministry of Education & Korean Educational Development Institute. (2022). 2022영재 교육 통계 연보 [2022 Gifted education statistical yearbook]. Korean Educational Development Institute. https://ged.kedi.re.kr/stss/statPic.do#download
  • Larsen, R. (2011). Missing data imputation versus full information maximum likelihood with second-level dependencies. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(4), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607721
  • Lee, S. Y. (2015). Civic education as a means of talent dissemination for gifted students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9372-y
  • Lee, B., Jho, H., Lee, S., Ji, Y., Ha, S., & Kim, H. (2021). 대학부설 과학영재교육원의 운영 현황 분석 및 시사점 도출 [Analysis on current status and implication of the science education center for gifted affiliated with university]. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 13(3), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.29306/jseg.2021.13.3.160
  • Lee, S., Matthews, M., Shin, J., & Kim, M. (2018). Academically gifted adolescents’ social purpose. High Ability Studies, 31(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1533452
  • Lee, S. Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 29–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320603000103
  • Lim, Y. J., Ko, Y. G., Shin, H. C., & Cho, Y. R. (2012). 정신적 웰빙 척도(MHC-SF)의 한국어판 타당화 연구 [Psychometric evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in South Koreans]. The Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 31(2), 369–386. UCI: G704-001037.2012.31.2.009.
  • Lo, C., Porath, M., Yu, H., Chen, C., Tsai, K., & Wu, I. (2019). Giftedness in the making: A transactional perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218812474
  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  • Makel, M. C., Snyder, K. E., Thomas, C., Malone, P. S., & Putallaz, M. (2015). Gifted students’ implicit beliefs about intelligence and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215599057
  • Meyer, M. S., & Rinn, A. N. (2021). Developing leadership talent in adolescents and emerging adults: A systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(3), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211007556
  • Muthén, B. (2012). Latent variable interactions. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from http://www.statmodel.com/download/LV%20Interaction.pdf.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998−2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén, Muthén.
  • Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553991
  • Ogurlu, Ü., Sevgi-Yalın, H., & Yavuz-Birben, F. (2018). The relationship between social-emotional learning ability and perceived social support in gifted students. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416657221
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Clarenbach, J. (2012). Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high ability students. National Association for Gifted Children. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED537321.pdf
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en
  • Park, Y. S., & Kim, P. H. (2015). 중학생의 사회정서적 유능성과 자기조절학습, 학업성취도의 관계 [The relationship of social emotional competence and self-regulated learning, and academic achievement of middle school students]. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 23(4), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.18230/tjye.2015.23.4.129
  • Peterson, J. S. (2012). The counseling relationship. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 443–460). Prufrock Press.
  • Popham, W. J. (1988). Educational evaluation (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Porath, M. (2000). Social giftedness in childhood: A developmental perspective. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 195–215). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10373-009
  • Preckel, F., & Vock, M. (2013). Hochbegabung. Ein Lehrbuch zu Grundlagen, Diagnose und Fördermöglichkeiten [Giftedness: A textbook about basic concepts, identification, and fostering options]. Hogrefe.
  • Quazi, W., Raza, S. A., & Khan, K. A. (2020). The contradiction between self-protection and self-presentation on knowledge sharing behaviour: Evidence from higher education students in Pakistan. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 13(3), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2020.109910
  • Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
  • Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421
  • Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Umer, B., & Khan, K. A. (2020). Influence of social networking sites on life satisfaction among university students: A mediating role of social benefit and social overload. Health Education, 120(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-07-2019-0034
  • Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021). The influence of psychological, motivational, and behavioral factors on university students’ achievements: The mediating effect of academic adjustment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2020-0065
  • Rost, D. H. (2013). Handbuch intelligenz [Handbook intelligence]. Beltz.
  • Rutigliano, A., & Quarshie, N. (2021), Policy approaches and initiatives for the inclusion of gifted students in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 262. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c3f9ed87-en
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Shin, D., Kwon, D., & Shim, J. (2019). 정보영재와 수학영재의 특성 분석: 과흥분성과 지능을 중심으로 [An analysis of characteristics of gifted students in computing and mathematics: Focusing on overexcitabilities and intelligence]. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 29(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2019.29.2.165
  • Start, B. (2002). The measurement of high intellectual abilities: The abnormality of gauss [ Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Learning and Educational Development, University of Melbourne.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318658
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Transformational vs. transactional deployment of intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010015
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2022). Identify transformational, not just transactional giftedness! Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 159–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211037950
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. Free Press.
  • Sung, T. (2017). 교육 연구 방법의 이해 [Understanding of educational research method] (4th ed.). Hakjisa.
  • Sytsma, R. E. (2003). Co-cognitive factors and socially constructive giftedness: Distribution, abundance, and relevance among high school students (Publication No. 3118971) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  • Tommasi, M., Pezzuti, L., Colom, R., Abad, F. J., Saggino, A., & Orsini, A. (2015). Increased educational level is related with higher IQ scores but lower g-variance: Evidence from the standardization of the WAIS-R for Italy. Intelligence, 50, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.005
  • Tourangeau, R. (2000). Remembering what happened: Memory errors and survey reports. In A. A. Stone, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 29–47). Erlbaum.
  • Van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40–48. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.210155003844269
  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2013). Curriculum for the gifted: A commitment to excellence. Gifted Child Today, 36(3), 213–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217513487351
  • Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modelling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
  • Wilkerson, T. L., Mistretta, R. M., Adcock, J., Yoder, G. B., Johnston, E., Bu, L., Nugent, P. M., & Booher, L. (2021). Effects of language on children’s understanding of mathematics: Implications for teacher education. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 26(2), 7–31. (EJ1345568). ERIC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1345568.pdf
  • Wolfgang, C., & Snyderman, D. (2022). An analysis of the impact of school closings on gifted services: Recommendations for meeting gifted students’ needs in a post-COVID-19 world. Gifted Education International, 38(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211054262
  • World Health Organization. (2018). Mental health: Strengthening our response. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response
  • Wu, E. (2013). Enrichment and acceleration: Best practice for the gifted and talented. Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 27(2), 1–8.
  • Yang, S., Jang, J., Park, S. Y., Ahn, S. H., Kim, S., Park, S. B., Ryu, B., Lee, S., Shin, E., Kim, N., Yoo, M., Lee, J., Kim, T., Kang, A. R., & Kwon, D. (2022). 국내 코로나19 확진자 2년 발생 보고서 (2020.1.20.∼2022.1.19.) [COVID-19 special report: COVID-19 outbreak report from January 20, 2020 to January 19, 2022 in the Republic of Korea]. Public Health Weekly Report, 15(7), 414–426. https://www.kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20602010000&bid=0034&list_no=718713&act=view
  • Zhang, H., Khaskheli, A., Raza, S. A., & Masood, A. (2023). Linkage between students’ skills and employability: Moderating influence of university reputation. Corporate Reputation Review. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-023-00169-9
  • Ziegler, A., & Raul, T. (2000). Myth and reality: A review of empirical studies on giftedness. High Ability Studies, 11(2), 113–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130020001188

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.