Australian gifted education scholarship: A bibliometric analysis

References

• AAEGT. (2020). AAEGT John Geake outstanding thesis award. https://www.aaegt.net.au/page_id=1926
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. (2020). Home. https://www.acara.edu.au/home
   Google Scholar
• Adler, N., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S. A. J., Abdel-Magid, I. M., & Hussain, A. (2017). Comparison among journal impact factor, SCimago journal rank indicator, eigenfactor score and h5-index of environmental engineering journals. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics & Information Management, 11(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2016.1266807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. (2022, February 3). Farewell to Professor Miraca U. M. Gross. Belin-Blank Center. https://belinblank.wordpress.com/2022/02/03/farewell-to-professor-miraca-u-m-gross/
   Google Scholar
• Baccassino, F., & Pinnelli, S. (2023). Giftedness and gifted education. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1073007
   Google Scholar
• Blainey, G. (1966). The tyranny of distance: How distance shaped Australia’s history. Sun Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bosquet, C., & Combes, P. P. (2013). Are academics who publish more also more cited? Individual determinants of publication and citation records. Scientometrics, 97(3), 831–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0996-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braggett, E. J. (1985). The education of gifted and talented children: Australian provision. Fyshwick.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, C. A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definitions of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12472602
   Google Scholar
• Cotes, J. A., Leong, S. M., & Cote, J. (1991). Assessing the influence of journal of consumer research: A citation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1086/209269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, H. (2011). State or research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998–2010. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(22), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210397831
   Google Scholar
• De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometric and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetics. Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado López-Cózar, E., Orduña-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., & Ayllón, J. M. (2017). Google scholar: The big data bibliographic tool. In F. J. Cantu-Ortiz (Ed.), Research analytics: Boosting university productivity and competitiveness through scientometrics (pp. 59–80). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2019). Alice springs (mparntwe) education declaration. https://www.dese.gov.au/alice-springs-mparntwe-education-declaration
   Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser-Seeto, K. (2013). Pre-service training in gifted and talented education: An Australian perspective. Journal of Student Engagement Matters, 3(1), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2020). Differentiating giftedness from talent: The DMGT perspective on talent development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychological study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, M. L. (1981). Issues in the education of gifted and talented children in Australia and the United States. Schools Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gonski, D., Arcus, T., Boston, K., Gould, V., Johnson, W., O’Brien, L., Perry, L. A., & Roberts, M. (2018). Through growth to achievement. Department of Education and Training, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced‐choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11(4), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198909553207
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, D. (2020). Australia: The Australian education system. In H. Ärlestig & O. Johansson (Eds.), Education authorities and the schools: Organization and impact in 20 states (pp. 311–331). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A.-W. (2018). Google scholar profiless: The good, the bad, and the better. https://harzing.com/blog/2018/11/google-scholar-citation-profiles-the-good-the-bad-and-the-better
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A. W. (2019). Publish or perish user’s manual. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, T. (1993). A historical content analysis of gifted education journals. Roeper Review, 16(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553533
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., & Jarvis, J. (2016). The gifted dimension of the Australian professional standards for teachers: Implications for professional learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(8), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n8.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Torrano, D., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2019). The state and development of research in the field of gifted education over 60 years: A bibliometric study of four gifted education journals. High Ability Studies, 31(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1601071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, J., Mun, R. U., & Johnson, R. (2021). Lewis Terman in context: An analysis of citations of genetic studies of genius inside and outside the field of gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(3), 227–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211023596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, J., Mun, R. U., Oveross, M. E., & Ottwein, J. K. (2021). Assessing the scholarly reach of Terman’s work. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220928322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Bu, Y., Ding, Y., & Lu, W. (2018). Number versus structure: Towards citing cascades. Scintometrics, 1177(3), 2177–2193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2952-y
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: A systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, J. L., & Chessman, A. (2017). The landscape of Australian gifted education research: 1992–2013. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1522935
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, J. L., & Chessman, A. (2017). The landscape of Australian research: 1983–2013. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1522935
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, J. L., & Jarvis, J. M. (Eds.). (2018). Exploring gifted education: Australian and New Zealand perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, J. L., & Matthews, M. S. (2012). A critique of the literature on parenting gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212451703
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, J. L., & Robins, J. H. (2021). Australian gifted and talented education: An analysis of government policies. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(8), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n8.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y. (n.d.). Australasian Journal of Gifted Education. http://www.aaegt.net.au/?page_id=736
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y., & Worrell, F. (2017). School psychological practice with gifted students. In M. Thiekling & M. D. Terjesen (Eds.), Handbook of Australian school psychology (pp. 575–593). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07299197
   Google Scholar
• Kolaczyk, E. D., & Csárdi, G. (2020). Statistical analysis of network data with R. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, L., & Wang, D. (2020). Comparison of citations and attention of cover and non-cover papers. Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), 101905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate. National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/783/
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg, L. (2002). Foreword. In W. Vialle & J. G. Geake (Eds.), The gifted enigma: A collection of articles (pp. vi–xxi). Hawker Brownlow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, B. K. (2009). Rural gifted education: A comprehensive literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(4), 461–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903200402
   Google Scholar
• Liles, D. H., Johnson, M. E., & Meade, L. (1996, May). The enterprise engineering discipline. In Proceedings of the Fifth Industrial Engineering Research Conference (pp. 479–484). Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, E., & Stanford, J. (2021). An avoidable catastrophe: Pandemic job losses in higher education and their consequences. The Australia Institute. https://australiainstitute.org.au/report/an-avoidable-catastrophe/
   Google Scholar
• Long, H., Plucker, J. A., Yu, Q., Ding, Y., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Research productivity and performance of journals in the creativity sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luburic, I., & Jolly, J. L. (2019). An examination of the empirical literature: Gifted education in the Australian context. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218816498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majkut, L., & Rogers, K. B. (2005). Who gets left behind in the WISC-IV? The impact of full-scale index scores upon the identification of gifted and talented learners. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 14(2), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018, March 18). Evidence of open access of scientific publications in google scholar: A large-scale analysis. Journal of Informetric, 12(3), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. https://archive.org/details/robert_k_merton_social_theory_and_social_structure
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. S., & Rinn, A. N. (2021). Developing leadership talent in adolescents and emerging adults: A systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(3), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211007556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhailov, A. I. Chemyi, A. I. & Giliarevskii, R. S. (1984). Scientific communications and informatics. Information Resources Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., Macri, F., & Petrovici, D. (2012). Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management. Information Processing & Management, 48(2), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2011.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moltzen, R., Jolly, J. L., & Jarvis, J. M. (2018). Framing gifted education in Australia and New Zealand. In J. L. Jolly & J. M. Jarvis (Eds.), Exploring gifted education: Australian and New Zealand perspectives (pp. 5–11). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mun, R. U., Ezzani, M. D., & Lee, L. E. (2020). Culturally relevant leadership in gifted education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(2), 108–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220912009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pao, M. L. (1985). Lotka’s law: A testing procedure. Information Processing & Management, 21(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(85)90055-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M. R., Jordan, K. R., Kirk, E. R., Aspiranti, K. B., & Bain, S. K. (2010). Publications in four gifted education journals from 2001 to 2006: An analysis of article types and authorship characteristics. Roeper Review, 32(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.485309
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. (1980). Schools commission report. Triennium 1979-1981. Report for 1980. Schools Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Interface, 11(98). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2011). Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1–2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673587
   Google Scholar
• Price, D. J. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage process. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 27(5), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed, M. (2020). Context and content in rural gifted education: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X19879174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Rinn, A. N., & Bishop, J. (2015). Gifted adults: A systematic review and analysis of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215600795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. B. (1989). A content analysis of the literature on gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235328901300106
   Google Scholar
• Ronksley-Pavia, M., & Neumann, M. M. (2022). Exploring educator leadership practices in gifted education to facilitate online learning experiences for (re) engaging gifted students. Education Sciences, 12(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2020). The quest for revolution in Australian schooling policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education Reference Committee. (2001). The education of gifted and talented children. Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Select Committee on the Education of Gifted and Talented Children. (1988). The education of gifted and talented children. Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Shareefa, M., & Moosa, V. (2020). The most-cited educational research publications on differentiated instruction: A bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.331
   Google Scholar
• Shermis, S. S. (1962). What makes a subject respectable? On becoming an intellectual discipline. Phi Delta Kappan, 44(2), 84–86. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20342852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorneycroft, A., & Hyde, B. (2022). Using phenomenology to access teachers’ understanding of the benefits of student voice in the context of gifted and talented education in an Australian independent school. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 31(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2022.0005
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (n.d.). Definition of regions with a view to the execution by the organization of regional activities. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/region-definition
   Google Scholar
• Vukovic, R. (2020). John Munro on gifted education. (Episode No. 56) [Audio podcast episode]. In The Research Files. Teacher. https://www.teachermagazine.com/au_en/articles/the-research-files-episode-56-john-munro-on-gifted-education
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, R. L., & Jolly, J. L. (2018). Gifted education in the Australian context. Gifted Child Today, 41(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517750702
   Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378–2392. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilma, V., Ashton, T., Carlon, G., & Rankin, F. (2001). Acceleration: A coat of many colours. Roeper Review, 24(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554119
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. (1996). Challenges and changes in policy and thinking in gifted education in Australia. Hawker Brownlow.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., & Raul, T. (2000). Myth and reality: A review of empirical studies on giftedness. High Ability Studies, 11(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130020001188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar