A Partnership of Convenience? Transnational Civil Society, International Organisations and Practices of Global Order

References

• Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot, eds. 2011a. International Practices. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511862373.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel, Vincent Pouliot, Emanuel Adler, and Vincent Pouliot, eds. 2011b. “International Practices: Introduction and Framework.” In International Practices, 1st ed., 3–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511862373.
   Google Scholar
• Anderl, Felix, Christopher Daase, Nicole Deitelhoff, Jannik Pfister, Philip Wallmeier, and Victor Kempf, eds. 2019. Rule and Resistance Beyond the Nation State. Contestation, Escalation, Exit. London / New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D., Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell, eds. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge Studies in International Relations 114. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, Karin, and Frederik Söderbaum. 2022. “Explaining Variation in Legitimation and Delegitimation Practices: Policy Field and Institutional Access.” In Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance: Practices, Justifications, and Audiences, edited by Magdalena Bexell, Christer Jönsson, and Anders Uhlin, 74–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bexell, Magdalena, Jonas Tallberg, and Anders Uhlin. 2010. “Democracy in Global Governance: The Promises and Pitfalls of Transnational Actors.” Global Governance 16 (1): 81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bially Mattern, Janice Bially, and Ayşe Zarakol. 2016. “Hierarchies in World Politics.” International Organization 70 (3): 623–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdandy, Armin von, and Ingo Venzke. 2014. In wessen Namen? Internationale Gerichte in Zeiten globalen Regierens. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, Christian, and Frank Gadinger. 2018. International Practice Theory. 2. Aufl. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Andrew F, and Vincent Pouliot. 2015. “How Much Is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice.” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3): 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715576007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daase, Christopher, and Nicole Deitelhoff. 2019. “Opposition and Dissidence: Two Modes of Resistance against International Rule.” Journal of International Political Theory 15 (1): 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218808312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dany, Charlotte. 2012. Global Governance and NGO Participation : Shaping the Information Society in the United Nations. New York / London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078181.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, Klaus. 2014. “Global Democracy and the Democratic Minimum: Why a Procedural Account Alone Is Insufficient.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 1124–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113509116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, Klaus, Henning Schmidtke, and Tobias Weise. 2019. “The Rise of Democratic Legitimation: Why International Organizations Speak the Language of Democracy.” European Journal of International Relations 26 (3): 714–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehl, Caroline, and Katja Freistein. 2020a. “(Un)Making Global Inequalities: International Institutions in a Stratified International Society.” Journal of International Relations and Development March: 251–278. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00190-z.
   Google Scholar
• Fehl, Caroline, and Katja Freistein. 2020b. “Organising Global Stratification: How International Organisations (Re)Produce Inequalities in International Society.” Global Society 34 (3): 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1739627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoratti, Catia, and Anders Uhlin. 2022. “The Interplay between Delegitimation and Legitimation: Civil Society Protest and the Responses of Global Governance Institutions.” In Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance: Practices, Justifications, and Audiences, edited by Magdalena Bexell, Christer Jönsson, and Anders Uhlin, 96–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, Alexandru. 2015. Democratic Intergovernmental Organizations? Normative Pressures and Decision-Making Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316106181.
   Google Scholar
• Hack, Regina. 2020. Dialog im Reaktionsrepertoire von WTO und G7/G8: Die Einrichtung von deliberativen Dialogforen in Reaktion auf Protest. Studien des Leibniz-Instituts Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29576-9.
   Google Scholar
• Holthaus, Leonie. 2021. “Practice Theory and the Opening Up of International Organizations.” Global Studies Quarterly 1 (3): ksab020. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab020.
   Google Scholar
• Holzscheiter, Anna. 2016. “Representation as Power and Performative Practice: Global Civil Society Advocacy for Working Children.” Review of International Studies 42 (2): 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, Christer, and Jonas Tallber, eds. 2010. Transnational Actors in Global Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283220.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian, and Berthold Rittberger. 2023. “The LIO’s Growing Democracy Gap: An Endogenous Source of Polity Contestation.” Journal of International Relations and Development 26 (1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00275-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, Adrian, and Kate Macdonald. 2013. “Pathways to Global Democracy? Escaping the Statist Imaginary.” Review of International Studies 39 (4): 789–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, Gordon. this issue. “Democratic Practices in MERCOSUR and the OAS: What Space for Transnational Civil Society?” Global Society, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2023.2237044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, Deepak. 2021. ““Hanging Out” While Studying “Up”: Doing Ethnographic Fieldwork in International Relations.” International Studies Review 23 (4): 1300–1327. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanz, Patrizia, and Jens Steffek. 2004. “Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere.” Government and Opposition 39 (2): 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00125.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver B. 2002. “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy.” Millennium 31 (3): 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310031201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver B., and Ole Jacob Sending. 2007. “`The International’ as Governmentality.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (3): 677–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298070350030201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver B., and Ole Jacob Sending. 2010. Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Mentality, Rationality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, and Marc Williams, eds. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 71. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, Christopher L. 2013. Transnational Civil Society and the World Bank. Investigating Civil Society’s Potential to Democratize Global Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.10579781137277619.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, Christopher L., and Anders Uhlin. 2014. “Civil Society Influence on International Organizations: Theorizing the State Channel.” Journal of Civil Society 10 (2): 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2014.921102.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534564.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, and Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2018. “Global Governance in Practice.” Global Policy 9 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, and Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2023. Global Policymaking: The Patchwork of Global Governance. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009344999.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas. 2002. “Transnational Actors and World Politics.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 256–274. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608290.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Theodore R., Karin Knorr-Cetina, and Eike von Savigny. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London / New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2004. “Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance.” Government and Opposition 39 (2): 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2011. Building Global Democracy?: Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. 1st ed.. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2012. “A More Inclusive Global Governance? The IMF and Civil Society in Africa.” Global Governance 18 (2): 185–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan Aart. 2017. “Relations with Civil Society.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations, edited by Jakob Katz Cogan, Ian Hurd, and Ian Johnstone, 712–729. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Ty, and Brent J. Steele. 2017. “Micro-Moves in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 23 (2): 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116634442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerer, Thomas, and Jonas Tallberg. 2017. “Transnational Access to International Organizations 1950–2010: A New Data Set.” International Studies Perspectives 18: 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekv022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondarjee, Maïka. this issue. “Coloniality of Epistemic Power in International Practices: NGO Inclusion in World Bank Policymaking.” Global Society: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2023.2236129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, Jens, and Ulrike Ehling. 2008. “Civil Society Participation at the Margins: The Case of the WTO.” In Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance, edited by Jens Steffek, Claudia Kissling, and Patrizia Nanz, 95–115. Basingstoke [England]; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, Jens, Claudia Kissling, and Patrizia Nanz, eds. 2008. Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Basingstoke [England] ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sundaram, Sasikumar, and Vineet Thakur. 2021. “A Pragmatic Methodology for Studying International Practices.” Journal of International Political Theory 17 (3): 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088219879177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, Christer Jönsson, Thomas Sommerer, and Theresa Squatrito. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations. Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas, and Anders Uhlin. 2011. “Civil Society and Global Democracy: An Assessment.” In Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives, edited by Daniele Archibugi, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, and Raffaele Marchetti, 210–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlin, Anders, and S. Kalm. 2015. Civil Society and the Governance of Development: Opposing Global Institutions. 2015th ed. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Viola, Lora Anne. 2020. The Closure of the International System: How Institutions Create Political Equalities and Hierarchies. Cambridge ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, Christian. 2018. “Enacting a Parallel World: Political Protest against the Transnational Constellation.” Journal of International Political Theory, October, 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218806920.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, Christian. 2022. “The Problem of Sovereignty in Globalized Times.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 18 (3): 716–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872119828010.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, Ayşe, ed. 2017. Hierarchies in World Politics. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241588.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael, Martin Binder, and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt. 2012. “International Authority and Its Politicization.” International Theory 4 (1): 69–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael, Alexandros Tokhi, and Martin Binder. 2021. “The International Authority Database.” Global Policy 12 (4): 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar