Fostering accessible technology and sculpting an inclusive market through regulation

References

• Anastasiou, D., and J. M. Kauffman. 2013. “The Social Model of Disability: Dichotomy between Impairment and Disability.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38: 441–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. 1991. Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., and G. Mercer. 2010. Exploring Disability. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. 1999. “Apart or A Part? Access to the Internet by Visually Impaired and Blind People, With Particular Emphasis on Assistive Enabling Technology and User Perceptions.” Information Technology and Disabilities Journal 6 (3). Accessed April 15, 2015. http://itd.athenpro.org/volume6/number3/article2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Blanck, P. 2008. “Flattening the (Inaccessible) Cyberworld for People with Disabilities.” Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA 20 (3): 175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanck, P. 2014. eQuality: The Struggle for Web Accessibility by Persons with Cognitive Disabilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, J., S. Larsson, and P. O. Östergren. 2011. “The Right to Assistive Technology: For Whom, For What, and By Whom?” Disability and Society 26 (2): 151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafaggi, F., and A. Renda. 2012. “Public and Private Regulation. Mapping the Labyrinth.” CEPS Working Paper. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.ceps.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M., and T. Shakespeare. 2002. Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, C. 2012. “Revisiting the Law on Website Accessibility in the Light of the UK's Equality Act 2010 and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 20 (1): 19–47.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, D. 2014. “Deliverable 7.1. Analytical Framework for a Comparative Analysis of Accessible Technology Law and Policy.” Accessed April 20, 2015. http://discit.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Fossestol, K. 2007. Stairway to Heaven? ICT POLICY, Disability and Employment in Denmark, The Netherlands, UK and Norway. Accessed April 15, 2015. www.afi-wri.no/stream_file.asp?iEntityId=2626.
   Google Scholar
• Giannoumis, G. A. 2014. “Regulating Web Content: The Nexus of Legislation and Performance Standards in the United Kingdom and Norway.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 32 (1): 52–75. doi:10.1002/bsl.2103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannoumis, G. A., and J. Kline. 2014. “ Deliverable 7.2 (D7.2). Active Citizenship through the Use of New Technologies – The Experiences of Three Generations of Persons with Disabilities.” Accessed April 20, 2015. http://discit.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., and C. Newell. 2003. Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, R. 2010. “Digital Freedom for Persons with Disabilities: Are Policies to Enhance e-accessibility and e-inclusion Becoming More Similar in the Nordic Countries and the US?” In European Yearbook of Disability Law. Vol. 2, edited by Lisa Waddington and Gerard Quinn, 77–102. Antwerp, Oxford: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, P. 2013. “Internet Justice: Reconceptualizing the Legal Rights of Persons with Disabilities to Promote Equal Access in the Age of Rapid Technological Change.” Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal 9 (1): 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kayess, R., and P. French. 2008. “Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the onvention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Human Rights Law Review 8: 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. J., and J. Clayton. 2013. “Back to the Future: Disability and the Digital Divide.” Disability & Society 28 (5): 702–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordic Cooperation on Disability Issues. 2007. Provision of Assistive Technology in the Nordic Countries. Vällingby: Nordic Cooperation on Disability.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2013. “The Social Model of Disability: Thirty Years On.” Disability & Society 28 (7): 1024–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and C. Barnes, C. 2012. The New Politics of Disablement. Palgrave: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. R., and M. Banerjee. 2007. “Leveling the Digital Playing Field: Assessing the Learning Technology Needs of College-Bound Students with LD and/or ADHD.” Assessment for Effective Intervention 33 (1): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat, J., and R. Woodgate. 2011. “The Intersection of Culture, Disability and Assistive Technology.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 6 (2): 87–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roulstone, A. 1998. Enabling Technology: Disabled People, Work, and New Technology. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, A. 2003. “Changing Technology.” In Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments, edited by J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, and C. Thomas, Chapter 23. London: Sage. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Sheldon-chapter-for-alison.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Traustadóttir, T. 2009. “Disability Studies, the Social Model and Legal Developments.” In The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives, edited by G. Quinn and O. M. Arnadottir, 3–16. The Hague: Brill-Martinus Nijohff.
   Google Scholar
• Wey, S. 2005. “One Size Does Not Fit All: Person-centred Approaches to the Use of Assistive Technology.” In Perspectives on Rehabilitation and Dementia, edited by M. Marshall, 202–208. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar