What makes a good school? Perspectives of students at inclusive secondary schools in Germany

References

• Adler, Kristin, Sanna Salanterä, and Maya Zumstein-Shaha. 2019. “Focus Group Interviews in Child, Youth, and Parent Research: An Integrative Literature Review.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1–15. doi:10.1177/1609406919887274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainscow, Mel. 2007. “Taking an Inclusive Turn.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 7 (1): 3–7. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2007.00075.x.
   Google Scholar
• Althoff, Frederik. 2021. “Inklusion in den Printmedien: Eine kritische Diskursanalyse zur Inklusion in überregionalen deutschen Tages- und Wochenzeitungen.” (Phd. Diss.). Cologne University.
   Google Scholar
• Annamma, Subini A., Amy L. Boelé, Brooke A. Moore, and Janette Klingner. 2013. “Challenging the Ideology of Normal in Schools.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (12): 1278–1294. doi:10.1080/13603116.2013.802379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baak, Melanie. 2019. “Racism and Othering for South Sudanese Heritage Students in Australian Schools: Is Inclusion Possible?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (2): 125–141. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1426052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglieri, Susan, Lynne M. Bejoian, Alicia A. Broderick, David J. Connor, and Jan Vall. 2011. “[Re] Claiming “Inclusive Education” Toward Cohesion in Educational Reform: Disability Studies Unravels the Myth of the Normal Child.” Teachers College Record 113 (10): 2122–2154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, Helen, Aileen McCafferty, Ethel Quayle, and Karen McKenzie. 2015. “Review: Typically-Developing Students’ Views and Experiences of Inclusive Education.” Disability and Rehabilitation 37 (21): 1929–1939. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.993433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman, Mere, and Elizabeth Eley. 2019. “Student Belonging: Critical Relationships and Responsibilities.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (9): 985–1001. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1602365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bešić, Edvina. 2020. “Intersectionality: A Pathway Towards Inclusive Education?” Prospects 49 (3–4): 111–122. doi:10.1007/s11125-020-09461-6.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, Julia. 2022. Translating Human Rights in Education: The Influence of Article 24 UN CRPD in Nigeria and Germany. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.12000946.
   Google Scholar
• Boger, Mai-Anh. 2015. “Theorie Der Trilemmatischen Inklusion.” In Herausforderung Inklusion: Theoriebildung Und Praxis, 3rd ed., edited by Irmtraud Schnell, 51–62. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R., and A. Przyborski. 2007. “Gruppendiskussionsverfahren und Focus Groups.” In Qualitative Marktforschung, edited by Renate Buber, and Hartmunt Holzmüller, 491–506. Heidelberg: Springer Link.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, K. 2016. “In Praise of Normal: Re-Reading Wolfensberger.” In Theorising Normalcy and the Mundane: Precarious Positions, edited by Rebecca Mallett, Cassandra A. Ogden, and Jenny Slater, 260–281. Chester: Chester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2022. Thematic Analysis. A Practical Guide. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brehme, David. 2017. Normalitätskonzepte Im Behinderungsdiskurs: Eine Qualitative Befragung Inklusiv-Beschulter Brandenburger Grundschulkinder. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Broer, Stephen M., Mary Beth Doyle, and Michael F. Giangreco. 2005. “Perspectives of Students with Intellectual Disabilities about their Experiences with Paraprofessional Support.” Exceptional Children 71 (4): 415–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchner, Tobias. 2018. Die Subjekte der Integration. Schule, Biographie und Behinderung. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Buchner, Tobias, and Gertraud Kremsner. 2019. “Behinderung Als Normalität – Normalität Als Behinderung.” In Inklusion Im Spannungsfeld von Normalität Und Diversität: Grundfragen Der Bildung Und Erziehung, edited by Elisabeth von Stechow, Phillip Hackstein, Kirsten Müller, Marie Esefeld, and Barbara Klocke, 145–156. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. 2021. “Anteil der Studienberechtigten an der altersspezifischen Bevölkerung (Studienberechtigtenquote) nach Art der Hochschulreife.” BMBF, December 16. https://www.datenportal.bmbf.de/portal/de/Tabelle-2.5.85.html.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Catherine, and Ian Grosvenor. 2005. The School I’d Like: Children and Young People’s Reflections on an Education for the 21st Century. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2009. Contours of Ableism. The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Cefai, Carmel, and Paul Cooper. 2010. “Students without Voices: The Unheard Accounts of Secondary School Students with Social, Emotional and Behaviour Difficulties.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25 (2): 183–198. doi:10.1080/08856251003658702.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, David, and Wendy Cavendish. 2020. “‘Sit in my Seat’: Perspectives of Students with Learning Disabilities about Teacher Effectiveness in High School Inclusive Classrooms.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (3): 288–309. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1459888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, Alison. 2018. “Tracing the Evolution of Student Voice in Educational Research.” In Radical Collegiality Through Student Voice: Educational Experience, Policy and Practice, edited by Roseanne Bourke, and Judith Loveridge, 17–38. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1858-0_2.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, Colleen, Alan Dyson, and Alan Millward. 2003. “Participation and Democracy: What’s Inclusion Got to do with It?” In Inclusion, Participation and Democracy: What is the Purpose?, edited by Julie Allan, 49–65. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/0-306-48078-6_4.
   Google Scholar
• Dalbert, Claudia. 2013. “Die Bedeutung schulischen Gerechtigkeitserlebens für das subjektive Wohlbefinden in der Schule.” In Gerechtigkeit in der Schule, edited by Claudia Dalbert, 127–143. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, Scot, and Srikala Naraian. 2015. “This New Field of Inclusive Education: Beginning a Dialogue on Conceptual Foundations.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 53 (1): 70–85. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-53.1.70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare, Lynn, and Elizabeth Nowicki. 2018. “Strategies for Inclusion: Learning from Students’ Perspectives on Acceleration in Inclusive Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 69: 243–252. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Lennard J. 2014. The End of Normal: Identity in a Biocultural Era. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, Edward, and Richard Ryan. 2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutschlandatlas. 2022. “Verfügbares Einkommen privater Haushalte.” Deutschlandatlas, Accessed 15 July 2022. https://www.deutschlandatlas.bund.de/DE/Karten/Wie-wir-arbeiten/071-Verfuegbares-Einkommen-privater-Haushalte.html.
   Google Scholar
• De Vroey, Annet, Elke Struyf, and Katja Petry. 2016. “Secondary Schools Included: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 20 (2): 109–135. doi:10.1080/13603116.2015.1075609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, Alan, and Alan Millward. 2000. Schools and Special Needs: Issues of Innovation and Inclusion. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fend, Helmut. 2005. Entwicklungspsychologie des Jugendalters. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Flitner, Andreas. 1985. “Gerechtigkeit als Problem der Schule und als Thema der Bildungsreform.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 31 (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gabryszczak, Nina. 2015. “Themenbereich Inklusion: Die Lehrer müssen auf jeden Fall kompetenter werden, was das angeht.” In Schule aus Schülersicht: Ein Feedback über die Neuerungen in Unterricht und Schule: Alle Schulformen, edited by Ansgar Hüls, and Jost Schneider, 23–49. Berlin: Cornelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Göransson, Kerstin, and Claes Nilholm. 2014. “Conceptual Diversities and Empirical Shortcomings – A Critical Analysis of Research on Inclusive Education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29 (3): 265–280. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.933545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, Stephen. 2012. “Experiencing Fairness at School: An International Study.” International Journal of Educational Research 53: 127–137. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Greig, Anne, Jane Taylor, and Tommy MacKay. 2012. Doing Research with Children: A Practical Guide. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 2009. “Normal People.” In Modes of Thought: Explorations in Culture and Cognition, edited by David R. Olson, and Nancy Torrance, 59–71. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Mirko M., and Jürgen Link. 2004. “From the ‘Power of the Norm’ to ‘Flexible Normalism’: Considerations after Foucault.” Cultural Critique 57: 14–32. doi:10.1353/cul.2004.0008.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, John. 2008. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Torrano, Daniel, Michelle Somerton, and Janet Helmer. 2020. “Mapping Research on Inclusive Education Since Salamanca Statement: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature Over 25 Years.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 26 (9): 893–912. doi:10.1080/13603116.2020.1747555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz, Andreas. 2002. “Von der Integration zur Inklusion: terminologisches Spiel oder konzeptionelle Weiterentwicklung?” Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik 53: 354–361.
   Google Scholar
• Hinz, Andreas. 2017. “Inklusion im Schulsystem.” In Entwicklung und Qualität des deutschen Schulsystems: Neuere empirische Befunde und Entwicklungstendenzen, edited by Hans Günter Holtappels, 173–193. New York: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschberg, Marianne, and Swantje Köbsell. 2021. “Disability Studies in Education: Normalität/en im inklusiven Unterricht und im Bildungsbereich hinterfragen.” In Handbook of Inclusive Education: Global, National and Local Perspectives, edited by Andreas Köpfer, Justin J. W. Powell, and Raphael Zahnd, 127–146. Berlin: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp, Klaus. 1995. Lernen: subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp, Klaus. 2013. “The Fiction of Learning as Administratively Plannable.” In Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject: Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp, edited by Ernst Schraube, and Ute Osterkamp, 115–132. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hüls, Ansgar, and Jost Schneider. 2015. Schule aus Schülersicht: ein Feedback über die Neuerungen in Unterricht und Schule. Alle Schulformen. Berlin: Cornelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, Neil, and Sarah Lewis. 2008. “'Make Me Normal’: The Views and Experiences of Pupils on the Autistic Spectrum in Mainstream Secondary Schools.” Autism 12 (1): 23–46. doi:10.1177/1362361307085267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Mari-Ana, and Sara Bubb. 2020. “Student Voice to Improve Schools: Perspectives from Students, Teachers and Leaders in ‘Perfect’ Conditions.” Improving Schools 24 (3): 233–244. doi:10.1177/1365480219901064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle, Helga, and Johanna Mierendorff. 2013. Normierung und Normalisierung der Kindheit. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, Janette K., and Sharon Vaughn. 1999. “Students’ Perceptions of Instruction in Inclusion Classrooms: Implications for Students with Learning Disabilities.” Exceptional Children 66 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1177/001440299906600102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobs, Scarlett, Michel Knigge, and Reinhold Kliegl. 2021. “Gerechtigkeitsbeurteilungen zu SchülerInnen-Lehrkraft-Interaktionen in der inklusiven Schule – Eine experimentelle Studie unter Berücksichtigung sonderpädagogischer Förderbedarfe.” Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 24: 1309–1334. doi:10.1007/s11618-021-01040-5.
   Google Scholar
• Köbsell, Swantje. 2012. “Anders’ sein dürfen oder ,normal’ sein müssen? Gedanken zum Behinderungsbild in der Inklusionsdebatte.” In Inklusiv Gleich Gerecht? Inklusion Und Bildungsgerechtigkeit, edited by Simone Seitz, Nina-Kathrin Finnern, Natascha Korff, and Katja Scheidt, 180–184. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Külker, Anna, Marlena Dorniak, Sabine Geist, Harry Kullmann, Natascha Lutter, Birgit Lütje-Klose, and Christoph Siepmann. 2017. “Schulisches Wohlbefinden als Qualitätsmerkmal im Rahmen eines Lehrer-Forscher-Projekts an der Laborschule Bielefeld.” In Leistung inklusive? Inklusion in der Leistungsgesellschaft II: Unterricht, Leistungsbewertung und Schulentwicklung, edited by Annette Textor, Sandra Grüter, Ines Schiermeyer-Reichl, and Bettine Streese, 48–59. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Kultusministerkonferenz. 2020. Sonderpädagogische Förderung in Schulen 2009 bis 2018: Statistische Veröffentlichungen der Kultusministerkonferenz, Dokumentation Nr. 223. KMK, February. Accessed 17 July 2022. https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/Statistik/Dokumentationen/Dok223_SoPae_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lahelma, Elina. 2002. “School is for Meeting Friends: Secondary School as Lived and Remembered.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 23 (3): 367–381. doi:10.1080/0142569022000015418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, Mark R., and Roy F. Baumeister. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachment as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liasidou, Anastasia. 2012. “Inclusive Education and Critical Pedagogy at the Intersections of Disability, Race, Gender and Class.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 10: 168–184.
   Google Scholar
• Lindmeier, Christian, and Birgit Lütje-Klose. 2015. “Inklusion als Querschnittsaufgabe in der Erziehungswissenschaft.” Erziehungswissenschaften 26 (51): 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lingenauber, Sabine. 2013. “Normalität.” In Handlexikon Der Integrationspädagogik. Kindertageseinrichtungen, 2nd ed., edited by Sabine Lingenauber, 165–173. Bochum/Freiburg: Projektverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lüke, Timo, Matthias R. Hastall, Christian Marschler, and Michael Grosche. 2014. “Was liest man über Inklusion? Konzeption einer Medieninhaltsanalyse deutschsprachiger Printmedien.” Poster Presented at AESF Autumn Conference, Potsdam, November, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, Rebecca, Cassandra A. Ogden, and Jenny Slater. 2016. Theorising Normalcy and the Mundane: Precarious Positions. Chester: University of Chester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merl, Thorsten. 2021. “In/Sufficiently Able: How Teachers Differentiate between Pupils in Inclusive Classrooms.” Ethnography and Education 16 (2): 198–209. doi:10.1080/17457823.2021.1871853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messiou, Kyriaki. 2017. “Research in the Field of Inclusive Education: Time for a Rethink?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 21 (2): 146–159. doi:10.1080/13603116.2016.1223184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messiou, Kyriaki, and Max A. Hope. 2015. “The Danger of Subverting Students’ Views in Schools.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 19 (10): 1009–1021. doi:10.1080/13603116.2015.1024763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, Mona. 2014. “The Right to Inclusive Education in Germany.” The Irish Community Development Law Journal 3 (1): 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, John, and Stephen Houghton. 2008. “Perceptions of Secondary School Students with Mild Disabilities to the Academic and Social Support Mechanisms Implemented in Regular Classrooms.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 55 (3): 227–237. doi:10.1080/10349120802268321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, Michelle, Jan Gray, and Glenda Campbell-Evans. 2010. “Challenges of the Secondary School Context for Inclusive Teaching.” Issues in Educational Research 20 (3): 294–313.
   Google Scholar
• Pfahl, Lisa, and Justin J.W. Powell. 2011. “Legitimating School Segregation. The Special Education Profession and the Discourse of Learning Disability in Germany, 1908-2008.” Disability & Society 26 (2): 449–462.
   Google Scholar
• Portelli, John P., and Patricia Koneeny. 2018. “Inclusive Education: Beyond Popular Discourses.” International Journal of Emotional Education 10 (1): 133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Justin J. W. 2011. Barriers to Inclusion: Special Education in the United States and Germany. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Justin J. W. 2015. Barriers to Inclusion: Special Education in the United States and Germany. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Justin J. W., Benjamin Edelstein, and Jonna M. Blanck. 2016. “Awareness-raising, Legitimation or Backlash? Effects of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Education Systems in Germany.” Globalisation Societies and Education 14: 227–250. doi:10.1080/14767724.2014.982076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Mary Ann, Anne Graham, Robyn Fitzgerald, Thomas Nigel, and Nadine Elizabeth White. 2018. “Wellbeing in Schools: What do Students Tell us?” The Australian Educational Researcher 45: 515–531. doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0273-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prengel, Annedore. 2012. “Kann inklusive Pädagogik die Sehnsucht nach Gerechtigkeit erfüllen? – Paradoxien eines demokratischen Bildungskonzepts.” In Inklusiv Gleich Gerecht? Inklusion Und Bildungsgerechtigkeit, edited by Simone Seitz, Nina-Kathrin Finnern, Natascha Korff, and Katja Scheidt, 16–31. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Przyborski, Aglaja, and Julia Riegler. 2010. “Gruppendiskussion und Fokusgruppe.” In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, edited by Günter Mey, and Katja Mruck, 436–448. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Rabenstein, Kerstin, Tobias C. Stubbe, and Klaus-Peter Horn. 2020. Inklusion und Gymnasium: Studien zu Perspektiven von Lehrkräften und Studierenden. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Ramelow, Daniela, and Lisa Gugglberger. 2014. “Die Dimensionen eines gesunden Schulklimas für Schülerinnen und Schüler.” Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 9 (4): 253–258. doi:10.1007/s11553-014-0436-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, Helene. 2016. “Modern Settlements in Special Needs Education: Segregated Versus Inclusive Education.” Science as Culture 25 (2): 193–213. doi:10.1080/09505431.2015.1120283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, Eberhard. 2008. Schule und Gerechtigkeit. Anspruch und pädagogische Praxis. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Roffey, Sue. 2013. “Inclusive and Exclusive Belonging – The Impact on Individual and Community Well-Being.” Educational and Child Psychology 30 (1): 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Richard, and Michael Shevlin. 2017. “A Sense of Belonging: Children’s Views of Acceptance in “Inclusive” Mainstream Schools.” International Journal of Whole Schooling 13 (1): 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildmann, Ulrike. 2019. “Inklusive Pädagogik Zwischen Flexibelnormalistischen Und Transnormalistischen (Diskurs-)Strategien. Normalismustheoretische Analyse Gesellschaftlicher Entwicklungen.” In Inklusion Im Spannungsfeld von Normalität Und Diversität Band I : Grundfragen Der Bildung Und Erziehung, edited by Elisabeth Von Stechow, Philipp Hackstein, Kirsten Müller, and Marie Esefeld, 40–56. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Schwinger, Malte, Maike Trautner, Nantje Otterpohl, Birgit Lütje-Klose, and Elke Wild. 2020. “Dabei sein ist alles? Psychosoziale Entwicklung von Kindern mit Förderschwerpunkt Lernen in inklusiven vs. exklusiven Fördersettings.” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 12 (1): 64–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, Jim, and Felicia Pratto. 2012. “Social Dominance Theory.” In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, edited by Paul A. M. Van Lange, Arie W. Kruglanski, and E. Tory Higgins, 418–438. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446249222.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, Roger. 2001. “Social Justice and the Changing Directions in Educational Research: The Case of Inclusive Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 5 (2–3): 167–177. doi:10.1080/13603110118387.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, Roger. 2019. “Belonging in an Age of Exclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (9): 909–922. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1602366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speck, Otto. 2019. Dilemma Inklusion. Wie Schule allen Kindern gerecht werden kann. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Gary. 2013. “A Review of Thinking and Research about Inclusive Education Policy, with Suggestions for a New Kind of Inclusive Thinking.” British Educational Research Journal 39 (3): 473–490. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.652070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, Tanya, and Rod Michalko. 2009. “Introduction.” In Rethinking Normalcy: A Disability Studies Reader, edited by Tanya Titchkosky, and Rod Michalko, 1–14. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2016. “General Comment No. 4, Article 24: Right to Inclusive Education.” United Nations, November 25. Accessed 17 July 2022. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-4-article-24-right-inclusive.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2008. Inclusive Education: The Way of the Future. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN). 2006. “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).” United Nations. Accessed 04 July 2022. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbussche, Hanne, and Elisabeth De Schauwer. 2018. “The Pursuit of Belonging in Inclusive Education–Insider Perspectives on the Meshwork of Participation.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (9): 969–982. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1413686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem, Aster, Karine Verschueren, Katja Petry, and Elke Struyf. 2020. “An Analysis of Research on Inclusive Education: A Systematic Search and Meta Review.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (6): 675–689. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring, Gregor. 2008. “The Politics of Ableism.” Development 51 (2): 252–258. doi:10.1057/dev.2008.17.
   Google Scholar