Shared wisdom: a collaborative autoethnography on mentorship and women supporting women in academia

References

• Abdelaal, G. (2020). Coping with imposter syndrome in academia and research. The Biochemist, 42(3), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1042/BIO20200033
   Google Scholar
• Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., & Jones, S. H. (2017). Autoethnography. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011
   Google Scholar
• Bäker, A., Muschallik, J., & Pull, K. (2020). Successful mentors in academia: Are they teachers, sponsors and/or collaborators? Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1544235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belbase, S., Luitel, B., & Taylor, P. (2008). Autoethnography: A method of research and teaching for transformative education. Journal of Education and Research, 1(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v1i0.7955
   Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (2022). Why autoethnography? Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 23(2), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v23i2.2027
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. (2012). Collaborative autoethnography. Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danaei, K. J. (2019). Literature review of adjunct faculty. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 30(2), 17–33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1248412.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Du, W., Hernandez, P. R., Adams, A. S., Clinton, S. M., Barnes, R. T., Burt, M., Pollack, I., & Fischer, E. V. (2023). Promoting sense of belonging and interest in the geosciences among undergraduate women through mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 31(4), 446–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2023.2225395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. (1999). Heartful autoethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 9(5), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frels, R. K., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). The Experiences of Selected Mentors: A Cross-cultural Examination of the Dyadic Relationship in School-based Mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.679122
   Google Scholar
• Greenberger, S. W., Maguire, K. R., Martin, C. L., Chavez, T. E., & Delgado, G. (2021). Discovering reflective-narrative: Constructing experience in the Deweyan guide for reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 23(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1983423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guramatunhu-Mudiwa, P., & Angel, R. B. (2017). Women mentoring in the academe: a faculty cross-racial and cross-cultural experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1308095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, A. B., & Holt, E. A. (2022). Perceived social and academic roles of peer mentors in a pre-health college program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 30(5), 584–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2127257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, H., & Shannon, K. (2014). Comparing alternative voices in the academy: Navigating the complexity of mentoring relationships from divergent ethnic backgrounds. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(4), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.945738
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, K. R., Anderson, A. M., & Chavez, T. M. (forthcoming). Women in academia: Mentorship from a gendered perspective. International Journal of Mentoring & Coaching in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Malikovna, K. R., Mirsharapovna, S. Z., Shadjalilovna, S. M., & Kakhramonovich, A. A. (2022). Types of interactive methods in teaching English to students. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 14, 1–4. https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjm/article/view/2641
   Google Scholar
• Marino, F. E. (2020). Mentoring gone wrong: What is happening to mentorship in academia? Policy Futures in Education, 19(7), 747–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320972199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau-Johnson, F., Quirion, J., & Giles, A. (2023) Mentoring faculty: Impact, dyads vs. groups, and gender. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 31(4), 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2023.2225394
   Google Scholar
• Motulsky, S. L. (2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research? Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000215
   Google Scholar
• Neale McFall, C. (2020). Job satisfaction, enrichment, and institutional policy: Listening to faculty mothers. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 13(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2019.1622568
   Google Scholar
• Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE guide no. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaganas, E. C., Sanchez, M. C., Molintas, M. P., & Caricativo, R. D. (2017). Reflexivity in qualitative research: A journey of learning. The Qualitative Report, 22(2), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe-Trenner, A., & Meade, E. P. (2021). Hidden queen-post trusses. The Journal of Preservation Technology, 52(4), 49–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48647854
   Google Scholar
• Rimé, B., Bouchat, P., Paquot, L., & Giglio, L. (2020). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social outcomes of the social sharing of emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, H. (2020). “It Was Like I Was invisible: ” Women Adjuncts Teaching English. () [ Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. B., McIntyre, M. ,& Jazzar, M. (2010). Mentoring adjunct faculty using the cornerstones of effective communication and practice. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260903448375
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spall, S. (1998). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: Emerging operational models. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049800400208
   Google Scholar
• Templeton, N. R., Abdelrahman, N., & Donop, J. (2023). Editorial overview: Mentoring as a partnership in learning. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 31(2), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2023.2195341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenorio-Lopes, L. (2023). Mentor-mentee relationships in academia: Insights toward a fulfilling career. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1198094
   Google Scholar
• Terry, T., & Ghosh, R. (2015). Mentoring from different social spheres: How can multiple mentors help in doctoral Student success in Ed.D programs? Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(3), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1072396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, S. (2006). An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500205
   Google Scholar