The evaluation of 318 intrauterine pregnancy cases with an intrauterine device

References

• Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması Bölüm 4, sayfa 45–8. Ankara. 1998
   Google Scholar
• Speroff L, Darney P D. A Clinical Guide for Contraception Second Edition. Intrauterine Contraception (The IUD). Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 1996
   Google Scholar
• Reinprayoon D. Intrauterine contraception. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1992; 4: 527–530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• , et al. Population Reports. IUD's: An Update. Series B, No. 6, Population Information Program. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 1995
   Google Scholar
• Jain A K. Comparative performance of three types of IUDs in the United States. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intrauterine Contraception, F Hefnawi, S J Segal. Amsterdam, North-Holland 1975; 3–16, Cairo, Egypt, 12 – 14 December 1974
   Google Scholar
• Saure A, Hirvonen E, Kivijarvi A, . Comparative performance of Fincoid, Nova-T and ML 375 IUDs. Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects, G I Zatuchni, A Goldsmith, J J Sciarra, et al. Harper & Row, Philadelphia, PA 1985; 104–108
   Google Scholar
• Tatum H J, Connell E B. A decade of intrauterine contraception: 1976 to 1986. Modern Trends. 1986; 46(2)173–192
   Google Scholar
• Tietze C, Lewit S. Evaluation of intrauterine devices: ninth progress report of the cooperative statistical program. Stud Fam Plann 1970; 55: 1–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivin I, Tatum H J. Four years of experience with the CuT 380A intrauterine contraceptive device. Fertil Steril 1981; 36(2)159–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivin I, Alvarez F, Diaz J, et al. Intrauterine contraception with copper and with levonorgestrel: randomized study of the TCu 380Ag and Levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices. Contraception 1984; 30(5)443–456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowden R. General assessment of the Multiload Cu250 intrauterine device: UK network of IUCD research clinics. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1982, Suppl. 4: 58–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thiery M, Van Kets H, Van Der Pas H, et al. The ML Cu250; clinical experience in Belgium and the Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1982, Suppl. 4: 51–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). Mechanism of Action, Safety and Efficacy of Intrauterine Devices. WHO, Geneva 1987, (Technical Report Series 753)
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for Fertility Regulation. İnterval IUD insertion in parous women: a randomized multicentre comperative trial of the Lippes Loop D, Tcu220C and the Copper 7. Contraception 1982; 26(1)1–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho J, Wu Z, Cai S, et al. A randomized comparative trial of the MLCu375, CuT220C, steel ring and uterine cavity-shaped IUDs. Adv Contracep 1992; 8: 161–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sivin I, El S Mahgoub, McCarthy T, et al. Longterm contraception with the Levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg20) and the Copper T 380 Ag intrauterine devices: A five-year randomized study. Contraception 1990; 42(4)361–368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz J, Pinto Neto A M, Bahamondes L, et al. Performance of the Copper T 200 in parous adolescents: Are copper IUDs suitable for these women?. Contraception 1993; 48(1)23–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvior G T, Jr. Pregnancy outcome with removal of intrauterine device. Obstet Gynecol 1973; 41(6)894–896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Piya-Anant M. Outcome of pregnancy in the presence of intrauterine device. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 56(5)479–482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steven J D, Fraser I S. The outcome of pregnancy after failure of an intrauterine contraceptive device. J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 81: 282–284
   Google Scholar
• Tatum H J, Schmidt F H, Jain A K. Management and outcome of pregnancies asociated with the Copper T intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126(7)869–879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vessey M, Meisler L, Flavel R, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in women using different methods of contraception. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 86(7)548–556
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozuh Novak M, Andolsek L, Balogh S A, et al. Long-term use of intrauterine devices. IPPF Med Bull 1988; 22(1)1–3
   Google Scholar
• Kim-Farley R J, Cates W, Jr, Ory H W, et al. Febrile spontaneous abortion and the IUD. Contraception 1978; 18(6)561–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh D, Comas M R. Spontaneous abortion. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4th edition, D N Danforth. Harper & Row, Philadelphia, PA 1982; 378–392
   Google Scholar
• Lewit S. Outcome of pregnancy with intrauterine devices. Contraception 1970; 2(1)47–57
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. FDA investigating IUDs after death reported. FDA Drug Bull 1974; 4(2)10
   Google Scholar
• Stubblefield P, Fuller A, Foster S. Ultrasound-guided intrauterine removel of intrauterin contraceptive devices in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewit S. Outcome of pregnancy with intrauterine device. Contraception 1970; 2: 47
   Google Scholar
• Alvior G T, Jr. Pregnancy outcome with removal of intrauterine device. Obstet Gynecol 1973; 41: 894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaf A, Gohar M, Saad S, et al. Removal of intrauterine devices with missing tails during early pregnancy. Contraception 1992; 45: 541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman H, Stadel V B, Schlesselman S. Intrauterine device usage and fetal loss. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 58: 669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Family Planning Research Network. Pregnancy outcome associated with the use of IUDs. Br J Fam Plann 1989; 15: 7
   Google Scholar
• Vessey M P, Doll R, Peto R, et al. A long term follow up of women using different methods of contraception. An interim report. J Biosoc Sci 1976; 8: 373
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaim W, Mazor M. Pregnancy with and intrauterine device in situ and preterm delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1992; 252: 21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillebaud J. IUD and congenital malformation. Br Med J 1975; 1: 1016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivin I. Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar