Contraceptive counselling for women with multiple unintended pregnancies: the abortion client’s perspective

References

• Jaarrapportage 2014 van de Wet afbreking zwangerschap. Annual report 2014 of the Termination of Pregnancy Act [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Aug 30]. Available from: www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2015/10/29/jaarrapportage-2014-van-de-wet-afbreking-zwangerschap
   Google Scholar
• Bakker F, de Graaf H, de Haas S, et al. Seksuele gezondheid in Nederland 2009 [Sexual health in the Netherlands 2009]. Utrecht: Rutgers; 2013. Dutch.
   Google Scholar
• Picavet C. Zwangerschap en anticonceptie in Nederland [Pregnancy and contraception in the Netherlands]. Tijdschr Seksuologie. 2012;36:121–128. Dutch.
   Google Scholar
• Hehenkamp L, Wijsen C, Landelijke abortusregistratie. 2014. National abortion registration 2014 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Sep 14]. Available from: www.rutgers.nl/sites/rutgersnl/files/PDF/LAR_rapportage_2014_def.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moreau C, Trussell J, Desfreres J, et al. Patterns of contraceptive use before and after an abortion: results from a nationally representative survey of women undergoing an abortion in France. Contraception. 2010;82:337–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjeldestad FE. Using induced abortion to measure contraceptive efficacy. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995;27:71–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trost JE. Abortions in relation to age, coital frequency, and fecundity. Arch Sex Behav. 1986;15:505–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeber O. Anticonceptiegebruik van vrouwen die een abortus provocatus ondergaan [Contraceptive use of women who undergo termination of pregnancy]. Tijdschr Seksuol. 2013;37:102–108. Dutch.
   Google Scholar
• Jones RK, Singh S, Finer FB, et al. 2006. Repeat abortion in the United States [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jul 26]. Available from: www.guttmacher.org/pubs/2006/11/21/or29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Unintended Pregnancy, Institute of Medicine. Personal and interpersonal determinants of contraceptive use. In: Brown SS, Eisenberg L, editors. The best intentions. Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 1995. p. 160–176.
   Google Scholar
• Picavet C, Goenee M, Wijsen C. Characteristics of women who have repeat abortions in the Netherlands. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013;18:327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motivating behaviour change. EUFIC review 07/2014 [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Nov 30]. Available from: www.eufic.org/article/en/expid/Motivating-behaviour-change
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira AL, Lemos A, Figueiroa JN, et al. Effectiveness of contraceptive counselling of women following an abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009;14:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez LM, Steiner M, Grimes DA, et al. Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD006964.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen R, Albright J, Garrett JM, et al. Pregnancy and STD prevention counseling using an adaptation of motivational interviewing: a randomized controlled trial. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007;39:21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos MK, Bartholomew NE, Lohr KN. Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda. Contraception. 2003;67:115–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusseldorp E, van Genugten L, van Buuren S, et al. Combinations of techniques that effectively change health behavior: evidence from Meta-CART analysis. Health Psychol. 2014;33:1530–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ory MG, Smith ML, Mier N, et al. The science of sustaining health behavior change: the Health Maintenance Consortium. Am J Health Behav. 2010;34:647–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Krajewski C, Borrero S. Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:659–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basen-Enquist K. Attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy: a model of adolescents' HIV-related sexual risk behavior. Health Educ Q. 1992;19:263–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaccard J. Unlocking the contraception conundrum: reducing pregnancies in emerging adulthood. Washington (DC): The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Webb A. What do women want? Counselling in contraception. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002;7:150–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlands Genootschap van Abortusartsen. Professional standards [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 30]. Available from: www.ngva.net/public/dokter_info/?langId=en
   Google Scholar
• Evaluation Termination of Pregnancy Act 2005 [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2016 Aug 30]. Available from: http://www.ngva.net/resources/downloads/WAZ_evaluatie_Definitieve_webversie_b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hou MY, Hurwitz S, Kavanagh E, et al. Using daily text-message reminders to improve adherence with oral contraceptives: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:633–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matulich M, Cansino C, Culwell KR, et al. Understanding women's desires for contraceptive counseling at the time of first-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2014;89:36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunmann C, Glasier A. Specialist contraceptive counselling and provision after termination of pregnancy improves uptake of long-acting methods but does not prevent repeat abortion: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2296–2303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G. Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs . Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:545–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6:134–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacCoun RJ. Toward a psychology of harm reduction. Am Psychol. 1998;53:1199–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlatt GA. Harm reduction: come as you are. Addict Behav. 1996;21:779–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR. Motivational interviewing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:91–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noone J. Finding the best fit: a grounded theory of contraceptive decision making in women. Nurs Forum. 2004;39:13–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zanzu [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 30]. Available from: www.zanzu.be/en/home
   Google Scholar