The highly complex issue of conscientious objection to abortion: can the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling Grimmark v. Sweden redefine the notions of care before freedom of conscience?

References

• Lachman VD. Conscientious objection in nursing: definition and criteria for acceptance. Medsurg Nurs. 2014;23(3):196–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shanawani H. The challenges of conscientious objection in health care. J Relig Health. 2016;55(2):384–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giubilini A. Objection to conscience: an argument against conscience exemptions in healthcare. Bioethics. 2017;31(5):400–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalev C. Rights to sexual and reproductive health: the ICPD and the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Health Hum Rights. 2000;4(2):38–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund. Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights. A Handbook For National Human Rights Institutions. 2014 United Nations. Availablle from: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/NHRIHandbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chavkin W, Swerdlow L, Fifield J. Regulation of conscientious objection to abortion: an international comparative multiple-case study. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19:55–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Abortion Policies Database. United Nations and World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/95/7/17-197442.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception. World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/181041/9789241549264_eng.pdf; jsessionid¼89BD200DB7D402F19A527C03FF12C70B?sequence¼1.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming V, Frith L, Luyben A, et al. Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramsayer B, Fleming V. Conscience and conscientious objection: the midwife's role in abortion services. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(8):1645–1654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley C. Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer. J Med Ethics. 2017;43(4):207–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery J. Conscientious objection: personal and professional ethics in the public square. Med Law Rev. 2015;23(2):200–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigg R. Conscientious objection and "effective referral". Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017;26(1):32–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard JW. Is it ethical for a general practitioner to claim a conscientious objection when asked to refer for abortion? J Med Ethics. 2009;35(10):599–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bogaert LJ. The limits of conscientious objection to abortion in the developing world. Dev World Bioeth. 2002;2(2):131–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harries J, Cooper D, Strebel A, et al. Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives. International Code of Ethics for Midwives. Adopted at Glasgow International Council meeting, 2008. Reviewed and adopted at Prague Council meeting, 2014. Due for next review 2020. Available from: http://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/uploads/documents/CoreDocuments/CD2008_001%20V2014%20ENG%20International%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20for%20Midwives.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Application no. 43726/17. Ellinor Grimmark against Sweden. Notified in writing on 12 March 2020. Available at: https://laweuro.com/?p=10488.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Application no. 62309/17. Linda Steen against Sweden. Notified in writing on 12 March 2020. Available from: https://laweuro.com/?p=10486.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch J. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion. A guide to the implementation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Council of Europe. 1st printing; 2007. Available from: https://www.echr.coe.int/LibraryDocs/DG2/HRHAND/DG2-EN-HRHAND-09(2007).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Christian M. Conscientious refusal in healthcare: the Swedish solution. J Med Ethics. 2017;43(4):257–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming V, Maxwell C, Ramsayer B. Accommodating conscientious objection in the midwifery workforce: a ratio-data analysis of midwives, birth and late abortions in 18 European countries in 2016. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuklenk U. Conscientious objection in medicine: accommodation versus professionalism and the public good. Br Med Bull. 2018;126(1):47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selberg R. The midwife case and conscientious objection: new ways of framing abortion in Sweden. Int Fem J Polit. 2020;22(3):312–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.R. v. Poland, Application no. 27617/04; 2011. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{"itemid":["001-104911"]}.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi R. Health in the 21st Century: new rights come to the fore? Clin Ter. 2018;169(4):e149–e150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai H, Ouchi Y, Yokode M, et al. Toward the realization of a better aged society: messages from gerontology and geriatrics. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12(1):16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Luca A, Del Rio A, Bosco M, et al. Law on advance health care directives: a medical perspective. Clin Ter. 2018;169:e77–e81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioffi A, Bersani G, Rinaldi R. Medico-legal and bioethical perspectives following the constitutional legitimacy of assisted suicide in Italy. Med Leg J. 2020;88(3):151–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothschild J. Ethical considerations of gene editing and genetic selection. J Gen Fam Med. 2020;21(3):37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinelli S, Del Rio A. Beginning of life ethics at the dawn of a new era of genome editing: are bioethical precepts and fast-evolving biotechnologies irreconcilable? Clin Ter. 2020;171(5):e407–e411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstone M, King C, de Vrijer B, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethics and policy considerations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(6):515–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montanari Vergallo G, Zaami S, Di Luca NM, et al. The conscientious objection: debate on emergency contraception. Clin Ter. 2017;168(2):e113–e119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith L, Blyth E. Assisted reproductive technology in the USA: Is more regulation needed? Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(4):516–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper J, Geraedts J, Borry P, et al. Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(8):1603–1609. Jr;.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanari Vergallo G, Zaami S, Bruti V, et al. F. How the legislation in medically assisted procreation has evolved in Italy. Med Law. 2017; 36:5–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makenzius M, Tydén T, Darj E, et al. Sverige har nordens högsta aborttal Oönskade graviditeter bör ses i helhetsperspektiv - individer, vård, samhälle [Sweden has the highest abortion rate among the Nordic countries. Unwanted pregnancies should be seen in a holistic perspective–individuals, health care, community]. Lakartidningen. 2013;110:1658–1661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Committee of Social Rights, Federation of Catholic Families in Europe (FAFCE) v. Sweden (no. 99/2013); 2015. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/no-99-2013-federation-of-catholic-family-associations-in-europe-fafce-/1680748cb8.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. European Social Charter. Turin, 18th October 1961. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/168006b642.
   Google Scholar
• Domenici I. Antigone Betrayed? The European Court of Human Rights' Decisions on Conscientious Objection to Abortion in the Cases of Grimmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden. Eur J Health Law 2020;28(1):26–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszynko-Gryn J, Rusterholz C. Reproductive politics in twentieth-century France and Britain. Med Hist. 2019;63(2):117–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. The right to conscientious objection in lawful medical care. Resolution 1763; 2010. Available from: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/News/FeaturesManager-View-EN.asp?ID=950#:∼:text=There%20is%20a%20comprehensive%20and,are%20respected%2C%20protected%20and%20fulfilled.
   Google Scholar
• Fiala C, Gemzell Danielsson K, Heikinheimo O, et al. Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing 'conscientious objection' in reproductive health care. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(3):201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala C, Arthur JH. There is no defence for 'Conscientious objection' in reproductive health care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:254–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalling R, Schuklenk U. Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments. J Med Ethics. 2017;43(4):253–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savulescu J. Conscientious objection in medicine. BMJ. 2006;332(7536):294–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minerva F. Conscientious objection in Italy. J Med Ethics. 2015;41(2):170–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorino T, Mattioli F, Mencarini L. The impact of gynecologists' conscientious objection on abortion access. Soc Sci Res. 2020;87:102403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minerva F. Conscientious objection, complicity in wrongdoing, and a not-so-moderate approach. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017;26(1):109–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barke N. Grimmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden: no right for healthcare professionals to refuse to participate in abortion services, and framing strategies by anti-abortion actors. Strasbourg Observers; 2020. Available from: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2020/04/06/grimmark-v-sweden-and-steen-v-sweden-no-right-for-healthcare-professionals-to-refuse-to-participate-in-abortion-services-and-framing-strategies-by-anti-abortion-actors/.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso E. Abortion in Italy: forty years on. Fem Leg Stud. 2020;28(1):87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECSR, International Planned Parenthood Federation-European Network (IPPF-EN) v. Italy, Complaint No. 87/2012, decision on the merits of 10 September 2013, Resolution CM/ResChS(2014)6; ECSR, Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy, Complaint No. 91/2013, decision on admissibility and the merits of 12 October 2015, Resolution CM/ResChS(2016)3. Notified on 7th November 2013. Available from: https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng#{%22sort%22:[%22ESCPublicationDate%20Descending%22],%22ESCDcIdentifier%22:[%22cc-87-2012-dmerits-en%22]}.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb C. Conscientious objection: understanding the right of conscience in health and healthcare practice. New Bioeth. 2016;22(1):33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher R. Conscientious objection, harm reduction and abortion care (November 1, 2014). In Mary Donnelly and Claire Murray eds., Ethical and legal debates in Irish healthcare: confronting complexities. Manchester University Press; 2016. Queen Mary University of London, School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 203/2015. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2568449.
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. Expressing your personal beliefs as a doctor Guidance on conscientious objection and expressing your religious and cultural views when practising as a doctor. Last updated; 2020. Issued on 8th September 2020. Available from: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/ethics/personal-ethics/expressing-your-personal-beliefs-as-a-doctor.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The care of women requesting induced abortion. Evidence-based clinical guideline number 7; 2011 [last updated 2018 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/abortion-guideline_web_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Resolution on ‘Conscientious Objection’ (Kuala Lumpur, 2006). Reviewed and approved by the FIGO Executive Board, September 2005, and adopted by the FIGO General Assembly on 7 November 2006. Available from: https://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/FIGO%202006%20Resolution%20on%20Conscientious%20Objection-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FIGO Statement. 11th April 2019. FIGO Statement on the Ethics of Post-Abortion Care. Prepared by the FIGO Committee on Ethical and Professional Aspects of Human. Reproduction and Women's Health. Available from: https://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/ethics%20post-abortion%20care.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Abortion care. NICE guideline. Published: 25 September 2019. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng140/resources/abortion-care-pdf-66141773098693.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Nursing. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. RCN guidance. Conscientious objection. (Termination of pregnancy). Position Statement; 2020. Available from: https://www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/publications/rcn-guidance-termination-of-pregnancy-uk-pub-009325.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics. The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Number 385; 2007. Reaffirmed 2016. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Citation/2007/11000/ACOG_Committee_Opinion_No__385__The_Limits_of.50.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• European Council of Medical Orders. Principles of European medical ethics. Article 17, reproduction. Adopted on 6 January 1987. Appendix of the Principles adopted on 6 February 1995. Available from: http://www.ceom-ecmo.eu/en/view/principles-of-european-medical-ethics.
   Google Scholar
• Genuis SJ, Lipp C. Ethical diversity and the role of conscience in clinical medicine. Int J Family Med. 2013;2013:587541.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heino A, Gissler M, Apter D, et al. Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013;18(4):231–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lertxundi R, Ibarrondo O, Merki-Feld GS, et al. Proposal to inform European institutions regarding the regulation of conscientious objection to abortion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(3):198–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar