4,702
Views
74
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The state of qualitative research in health and social science literature: a focused mapping review and synthesis

, , , , &
Pages 627-645 | Received 30 Aug 2016, Accepted 05 Dec 2016, Published online: 03 Jan 2017

References

  • Barbour, R. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ, 322, 1115–1117.10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
  • Bradbury-Jones, C., Sambrook, S., & Irvine, F. (2009). The phenomenological focus group: An oxymoron? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 663–671.10.1111/jan.2009.65.issue-3
  • Bradbury-Jones, C., Taylor, J., & Herber, O. (2014). How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: Development of a new typology. Social Science & Medicine, 120, 135–141.10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.014
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Breckenridge, J., Jones, D., Elliott, I., & Nicol, M. (2012). Choosing a methodological path: Reflections on the constructivist turn. The Grounded Theory Review, 11, 64–71.
  • Bryant, A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryan & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–289). London: Sage.10.4135/9781848607941
  • Burnard, P. (2004). Writing a qualitative research report. Accident and Emergency Nursing, 12, 176–181.10.1016/j.aaen.2003.11.006
  • Caddick, N., Smith, B., & Phoenix, C. (2015). The effects of surfing and the natural environment on the well-being of combat veterans. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 76–86.10.1177/1049732314549477
  • Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2, 1. Retrieved February 26, 2016, from https://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_2/pdf/caellietal.pdf
  • Chang, L., & Basnyat, I. (2015). Negotiating biomedical and traditional Chinese medicine treatments among elderly Chinese Singaporean women. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 241–252.10.1177/1049732314551991
  • Cohen, N. Z., & Omery, A. (1994). Schools of phenomenology: Implications for research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 136–156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2013). 10 Questions to Help you Make Sense of Qualitative Research. Retrieved from http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_29c5b002d99342f788c6ac670e49f274.pdf
  • Cutcliffe, J. R. (2005). Adapt or adopt: Developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 421–428.10.1111/jan.2005.51.issue-4
  • Davies, C. A. (1999). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching self and others. London: Routledge.
  • Druetz, T., Kadio, K., Haddad, S., & Kouanda, S. (2015). Do community health workers perceive mechanisms associated with the success of community case management of malaria? A qualitative study from Burkina Faso. Social Science & Medicine, 124, 232–240.10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.053
  • Earle, V. (2010). Phenomenology as research method or substantive metaphysics? An overview of phenomenology’s uses in nursing. Nursing Philosophy, 11, 286–296.10.1111/nup.2010.11.issue-4
  • Ellen, R. F. (1984). Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct. London: Academic Press.
  • Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about ethnography. Walnut Creek: Altimira Press.
  • Emerson, R. M. N., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2005). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Finlay, L. (2012). Debating phenomenological research methods. In N. Friesen, T. Saevi, & C. Henriksson (Eds.), Hermeneneutic phenomenology in education: Method and practice  (pp. 17–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Fisher, J. A. (2015). Stopped hearts, amputated toes and NASA: Contemporary legends among healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, 127–142.10.1111/1467-9566.12185
  • Frost, N., Nolas, S. M., Brooks-Gordon, B., Esin, C., Holt, A., Mehdizadeh, L., & Shinebourne, P. (2010). Pluralism in qualitative research: The impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Research, 10, 441–460.10.1177/1468794110366802
  • Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  • Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London: Sage.
  • Greckhamer, T., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 729–750.10.1080/09518390500298204
  • Greenhalgh, T., Annandale, E., Ashcroft, R., Barlow, J., Black, N., Bleakley, A., et al. (2016). An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research. BMJ, 352, i563.10.1136/bmj.i563
  • Guetterman, T. C. (2015). Descriptions of sampling practices within five approaches to qualitative research in education and the health sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2290/3826
  • Hammersley, M. (2008). The issue of quality in qualitative research. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Questioning qualitative inquiry (pp. 158–179). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9780857024565
  • Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 455–468.10.1177/1077800410364611
  • Hesse-Biber, S., Rodriguez, D., & Frost, N. A. (2015). Qualitatively driven mixed methods research. In B. Johnson & S. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The handbook of mixed and multi-method research (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioural science. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
  • Kelly, B. C., Trimarco, J., LeClair, A., Pawson, M., Parsons, J. T., & Golub, S. A. (2015). Symbolic boundaries, subcultural capital and prescription drug misuse across youth cultures. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, 325–339.10.1111/shil.2015.37.issue-3
  • Kitto, S., Chesters, J., & Grbich, C. (2008). Quality in qualitative research: Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the Medical Journal of Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 188, 243–246.
  • Lau, S. F., & Traulsen, J. M. (2016). Are we ready to accept the challenge? Addressing the shortcomings of contemporary qualitative health research. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.02.014.
  • Liamputtong, P., & Suwankhong, D. (2015). Therapeutic landscapes and living with breast cancer: The lived experiences of Thai women. Social Science & Medicine, 128, 263–271.10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.031
  • Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13, 254–271.10.1037/a0013220
  • Manias, E., & Street, A. F. (2001). Rethinking ethnography: Reconstructing nursing relationships. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 234–242.
  • Mannay, D., & Morgan, M. (2015). Doing ethnography or applying a qualitative technique? Reflections from the ‘waiting field’. Qualitative Research, 15, 166–182.10.1177/1468794113517391
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 475–482.10.1177/1077800410364740
  • Meyrick, J. (2006). What is good qualitative research?: A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 799–808.10.1177/1359105306066643
  • Mogensen, L., & Mason, J. (2015). The meaning of a label for teenagers negotiating identity: Experiences with autism spectrum disorder. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, 255–269.10.1111/1467-9566.12208
  • Norlyk, A., & Harder, I. (2010). What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 420–431.10.1177/1049732309357435
  • Platt, J. (2016). Using journal articles to measure the level of quantification in national sociologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 31–49.10.1080/13645579.2014.947644
  • Pope, C. (2005). Conducting ethnography in medical settings. Medical Education, 39, 1180–1187.10.1111/med.2005.39.issue-12
  • Porter, S. (2008). Nursing research and the cults of phenomenology. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13, 267–268.10.1177/1744987108094400
  • Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L. V., & McDonald, L. A. (2015). ‘My mentor kicked a dying woman’s bed …’ Analysing UK nursing students’ ‘most memorable’ professionalism dilemmas. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71, 169–180.10.1111/jan.12457
  • Richards, D. A., Coulthard, V., & Borglin, G. (2014). The state of European nursing research: Dead, alive, or chronically diseased? A systematic literature review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11, 147–155.10.1111/wvn.12039
  • Riera, A., Ocasio, A., Tiyyagura, G., Krumeich, L., Ragins, K., Thomas, A., … Vaca, F. E. (2015). Latino caregiver experiences with asthma health communication. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 16–26.10.1177/1049732314549474
  • Riessman, C. K., & Quinney, L. (2005). Narrative in social work: A critical review. Qualitative Social Work, 4, 391–412. doi:10.1177/1473325005058643.
  • Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
  • Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203413081
  • Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 1–8.10.1097/00012272-199312000-00002
  • Sandelowski, M. (2015). A matter of taste: Evaluating the quality of qualitative research. Nursing Inquiry, 22, 86–94.10.1111/nin.2015.22.issue-2
  • Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41, 885–899.10.1177/0038038507080443
  • Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sharma, S., Reimer-Kirkham, S., & Cochrane, M. (2009). Practicing the awareness of embodiment in qualitative health research: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1642–1650.10.1177/1049732309350684
  • Simera, I., Moher, D., Hirst, A., Hoey, J., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: Reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR network. BMC Medicine, 8. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/8/2410.1186/1741-7015-8-24
  • Taber, N. (2010). Institutional ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative: An argument for incorporating multiple methodologies. Qualitative Research, 10, 5–25.10.1177/1468794109348680
  • Thomas, S. P. (2005). Through the lens of Merleau-Ponty: Advancing the phenomenological approach to nursing research. Nursing Philosophy, 6, 63–76.10.1111/nup.2005.6.issue-1
  • Tight, M. (2016). Phenomenography: The development and application of an innovative research design in higher education research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 319–338.10.1080/13645579.2015.1010284
  • Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357.10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  • Travers, M. (2009). New methods, old problems: A sceptical view of innovation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 9, 161–179.10.1177/1468794108095079
  • Van Hoof, W., Pennings, G., & De Sutter, P. (2015). Cross-border reproductive care for law evasion: A qualitative study into the experiences and moral perspectives of French women who go to Belgium for treatment with donor sperm. Social Science & Medicine, 124, 391–397.10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.018
  • Van Mannan, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Walting, C. J., & Linigard, L. (2012). Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE guide no. 70. Medical Teacher, 34, 850–861.
  • Wiles, R., Crow, G., & Pain, H. (2011). Innovation in qualitative research methods: A narrative review. Qualitative Research, 11, 587–604.10.1177/1468794111413227

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.