Interventional robotic systems: Applications and technology state‐of‐the‐art

References

• Craig J. J. Introduction to Robotics. 1989, 2nd ed: Addison‐Wesley
   Google Scholar
• Kwoh Y. S., Hou J., Jonckheere E. A., Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1988; 35: 153–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng. [H] 2000; 214: 129–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary K., Nguyen C. State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6: 312–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor R. H., Stoianovici D. Medical robotics in computer‐integrated surgery. Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation 2003; 19: 765–81
   Google Scholar
• Pott P. P., Scharf H. P., Schwarz M. L. Today's state of the art in surgical robotics. Comput Aided Surg 2005; 10: 101–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melzer A., Schurr M. O., Kunert W., Buess G., et al. Intelligent Surgical Instrument System ISIS. Concept and Preliminary experimental application of components and prototypes. Endoscopic Surgery and Allied Technologies 1993; 1: 165–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guthart G. S., J. Kenneth Salisbury J. The intuitive telesurgery system: overview and application. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2000. 618–21
   Google Scholar
• Adler J. R, Jr., Murphy M. J., Chang S. D., Hancock S. L. Image‐guided robotic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 1299–1306; discussion 1306–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoianovici D., Cleary K., Patriciu A., Mazilu D., et al. AcuBot: A Robot for Radiological Interventions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 2003; 19: 926–30
   Google Scholar
• Stoianovici D., Cadeddu J. A., Demaree R. D., Basile S. A., Taylor R. H., Whitcomb L. L., Sharpe W. N., Kavoussi L. R. An efficient needle injection technique and radiological guidance method for percutaneous procedures. Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine – Medical Robotics and Computer‐Assisted Surgery (CVRMed‐MRCAS'97);, J Troccaz, E Grimson. Springer‐Verlag, GrenobleFrance 1997; 295–8
   Google Scholar
• Stoianovici D., Whitcomb L. L., Anderson J. H., Taylor R. H., et al. A modular surgical robotic system for image guided percutaneous procedures. Medical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention. 1998; 404–10
   Google Scholar
• Patriciu A., Solomon S., Kavoussi L. R., Stoianovici D. Robotic Kidney and Spine Percutaneous Procedures Using a New Laser‐Based CT Registration Method. Medical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention, W Niessen, M. A Viergever. Springer‐Verlag, UtrechtNetherlands 2001; 249–58
   Google Scholar
• Solomon S. B., Patriciu A., Bohlman M. E., Kavoussi L. R., et al. Robotically Driven Interventions: A Method of Using CT Fluoroscopy without Radiation Exposure to the Physician. Radiology 2002; 225: 277–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary K., Stoianovici D., Patriciu A., Mazilu D., et al. Robotically assisted nerve and facet blocks: a cadaveric study. Academic Radiology 2002; 9: 821–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronreif G., Fürst M., Kettenbach J., Figl M., et al. Robotic guidance for percutaneous interventions. Advanced Robotics 2003; 17: 541–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronreif G., Kettenbach J., Figl M., Kleiser L., et al. Evaluation of a robotic targeting device for interventional radiology. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS); 2004: Elsevier; 2004. 486–91
   Google Scholar
• Kettenbach J., Kronreif G., Figl M., Furst M., et al. Robot‐assisted biopsy using computed tomography‐guidance: initial results from in vitro tests. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 219–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettenbach J., Kronreif G., Figl M., Furst M., et al. Robot‐assisted biopsy using ultrasound guidance: initial results from in vitro tests. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 765–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb W., Kornfeld M., Birkfellner W., Boesecke R., et al. Risk analysis and safety assessment in surgical robotics: A case study on a biopsy robot. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol 2005; 14: 23–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melzer A., Seibel R. MR guided therapy of spinal disease. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol 1999; 89–93
   Google Scholar
• Melzer A., Gutmann B., Lukoschek A., Mark M., et al. Experimental Evaluation of an MRI compatible Telerobotic System for CT MRI guided Interventions. Supplement to Radiology 2003; 226: 409 #444
   Google Scholar
• Bock M., Zimmerman H., Gutmann B., Melzer A., et al. Combination of a Fully MR‐compatible Robotic Assistance System for Closed‐bore High‐field MRI Scanners with Active Device Tracking and Automated Image Slice Positioning. Radiological Society of North America Scientific Program, Supplement to Radiology 2004; 227: 398
   Google Scholar
• Stoianovici D., Patriciu A., Mazilu D., Petrisor D., et al. Multi‐Imager Compatible Robot for Transperineal Percutaneous Prostate Access., IEEE Transactions on Robotics 2005: submitted
   Google Scholar
• Stoianovici D., Patriciu A., Mazilu D., Petrisor D., et al. Pneumatic Step Motor., IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 2005: submitted
   Google Scholar
• Stoianovici D. Multi‐Imager Compatible Actuation Principles in Surgical Robotics. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2005; 1: 86–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitwieser H., Boscan S. M., Becker H., Voges U., et al. Feasibility of Manual Control Device for Robotic Assisted Needle Insertion in CT and MRI. Supplement to Radiology 2002; 225: 155; 192VI‐p
   Google Scholar