References
- Shikora SA, Mahoney CB. Clinical benefit of gastric staple line reinforcement (SLR) in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1133–1141.
- Kawasaki K, Fujino Y, Kanemitsu K, et al. Experimental evaluation of the mechanical strength of stapling techniques. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(10):1796–1799.
- Kawada K, Sakai Y. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(25):5718.
- Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88(9):1157–1168.
- Chekan E, Whelan RL. Surgical stapling device–tissue interactions: what surgeons need to know to improve patient outcomes. J Med Devices. 2014;7:305–318.
- Cong Z, Fu C, Wang H, et al. Influencing factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer. World J Surg. 2009;33(6):1292–1297.
- Miller DL, Roy S, Kassis ES, et al. Impact of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic stapling technology on clinical and economic outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy procedures: a retrospective, observational study. Adv Ther. 2018;35(5):707–723.
- Kimura M, Terashita Y. Superior staple formation with powered stapling devices. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(3):668–672.
- Roy S, Yoo A, Yadalam S, et al. Comparison of economic and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with powered versus manual endoscopic surgical staplers. J Med Econ. 2017;20(4):423–433.
- Riggs MK, Bohm MR, Mountain PJ. Examining relationships between device complexity and failure modes of minimally invasive surgical staplers. V003T04A014. Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 2016 Nov 11–17; Phoenix, AZ. 2016.
- Hartung OV, Gariboldi V, Garitey V, et al. Are laparoscopic staplers effective for ligation of large intraabdominal arteries? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28(3):281–286.
- Araujo SEA, Perez RO. Paving the way towards cost-effective robotic surgical stapling. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2:109–109.
- Nakayama S, Hasegawa S, Nagayama S, et al. The importance of precompression time for secure stapling with a linear stapler. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2382–2386.
- Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2988–2995.
- Zhou Y, Qihang L, Jingjing X, et al. Effects of precompression time and strength on the physical characteristics of quasi-stapled porcine small intestinal tissue. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018;232(8):741–752.
- Ho YH, Ashour MAT. Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(13):1610–1621.
- Zhao L, Zhou Y, Song C, et al. Predicting burst pressure of radiofrequency-induced colorectal anastomosis by bio-impedance measurement. Physiol Meas. 2017;38(3):489–500.
- Contini E, Whiffen J, Bronson D. Comparison of endostapler performance in challenging tissue applications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(3):417–421.
- Chinese Medical Device & Pharmaceutical Industry Standard YY 0876-2013. Linear cutter stapler and cartridge. Chinese standard.net [Online]; 2019 [accessed 2019 Dec 13]. Available from: https://www.chinesestandard.net/PDF/English.aspx/YY0876-2013
- Petrzelka J, Chatzigeorgiou D, Menon MC, et al. An articulating tool for endoscopic screw delivery. J Med Devices. 2010;4:027526.
- Jelínek F, Gerboni G, Henselmans PWJ, et al. Attaining high bending stiffness by full actuation in steerable minimally invasive surgical instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(2):77–85.
- Anderson PL, Patrick L, Lathrop AR. Robot-like dexterity without computers and motors: a review of hand-held laparoscopic instruments with wrist-like tip articulation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(7):661–672.