Disability support workers’ experience of interaction with a person with profound intellectual disability

References

• A framework for learning: For adults with profound and complex learning difficulties, Allen C. David Fulton, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Arthur M. Patterns amongst behavior states, sociocommunicative, and activity variables in educational programs for students with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2004; 16((2))125–149
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health & Welfare. 2003. Australia’s Welfare 2003. (AIHW Cat. No.  AUS 41). Retrieved 26 November, 2005, from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/9629
   Google Scholar
• Baker C., Wuest J., Noerager Stern P. Method slurring: The ground theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1992; 17: 1355–1360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett C., Bunning K. The importance of communication partnerships: A study to investigate the communicative exchanges between staff and adults with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disability 1997; 25: 148–152
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., Mirenda P. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2005, Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.)
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg K., West D., Iacono T. A. PICTURE IT: An evaluation of a training program for carers of adults with severe and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 2003; 28((3))260–282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunning K. To engage or not to engage? Affecting the interactions of learning disabled adults. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1998; 33((Suppl.))386–391
   Google Scholar
• Cannella H. I., O’Reilly M. F., Lancioni G. E. Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2005; 26: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J. W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• de Geeter K. I., Poppes P., Vlaskamp C. Parents as experts: The position of parents of children with profound multiple disabilities. Child: Care, Health & Development 2002; 28((6))443–453
   Google Scholar
• Dennis R. Nonverbal narratives: Listening to people with severe intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2002; 27((4))239–249
   Google Scholar
• Evenhuis H. M., Theunissen M., Denkers I., Verschuure H., Kemme H. Prevalence of visual and hearing impairment in a Dutch institutionalized population with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2001; 45((5))457–464
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Felce D., Bowley C., Baxter H., Jones E., Lowe K., Emerson E. The effectiveness of staff support: Evaluating Active Support training using a conditional probability approach. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2000; 21: 243–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felce D., Perry J. The extent of support for ordinary living provided in staffed housing: The relationship between staffing levels, resident characteristics, staff:resident interactions and resident activity patterns. Social Science & Medicine 1995; 40((6))799–810
   Google Scholar
• Golden J., Reese M. Focus on communication: Improving interaction between staff and residents who have severe or profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1996; 17((5))363–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode D. A world without words: Social construction of children born deaf and blind. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Goold L., Hummell J. Supporting the receptive communication of individuals with significant multiple disabilities: Selective use of touch to enhance comprehension. The Royal New South Wales Institute for Deaf and Blind Children, North Rocks, NSW 1993
   Google Scholar
• Granlund M., Olsson C. Efficacy of communication intervention for presymbolic communicators. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999; 15: 25–37
   Google Scholar
• Granlund M., Terneby J., Olsson C. Subject characteristics and the communicative environment of profoundly retarded adults. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 1992; 36((4))323–338
   Google Scholar
• Grove N., Bunning K., Porter J., Olsson C. “See what I mean?”: Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 1999; 12((3))190–203
   Google Scholar
• Guess D., Roberts S., Siegel‐Causey E., Ault M., Guy B., Thompson B., et al. Analysis of behavior state conditions and associated environmental variables among students with profound handicaps. American Journal of Mental Retardation 1993; 97: 634–653
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatton C., Rose J., Rose D. Researching staff. International handbook of research in intellectual disabilities, Emerson E, Hatton C, Thompson T, Parmenter T. Wiley, Chichester 2004; 581–605
   Google Scholar
• Husserl E. Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. George Allen & Unwin, London 1969, (trans. W. R. Boyce Gibson) (Original work published 1931)
   Google Scholar
• Iacono T. A., Chan J. B., Waring R. E. Efficacy of a parent‐implemented early language intervention based on collaborative consultation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1998; 33((3))281–303
   Google Scholar
• Kellett M., Nind M. Implementing Intensive Interaction in schools: Guidance for practitioners, managers and coordinators. David Fulton, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Kobe F. H., Mulick J. A., Rash T. A., Martin J. Nonambulatory persons with profound mental retardation: Physical, developmental, and behavioral characteristics. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1994; 15((6))413–423
   Google Scholar
• Light J. C., Parsons A. R., Drager K. “There’s more to life than cookies”: Developing interactions for social closeness with beginning communicators who use AAC. Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC, Reichle J, Beukelman D. R, Light J. C. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2002; 187–218
   Google Scholar
• McConkey R. Community integration and ordinary lifestyles. People with profound and multiple learning disabilities: A collaborative approach to meeting complex needs, Lacey P, Ouvry C. David Fulton, London 1998; 184–193
   Google Scholar
• McConkey R., Morris I., Purcell M. Communications between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1999; 43: 194–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean L. K., McLean J. E. Communication intervention for adults with severe mental retardation. Topics in Language Disorders 1993; 13((3))47–60
   Google Scholar
• McVilly K. R., Parmenter T. Professional ethics and disability services. Working in community disability services: An evidence‐based approach to practice, Dempsey I, Nankervis K. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney 2006; 241–271
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. E. The Australian Concise Oxford Dictionary. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne 2004, (4th ed.)
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Nelson C., van Dijk J., McDonnell A. P., Thompson K. A framework for understanding young children with severe and multiple disabilities: The van Dijk approach to assessment. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2002; 27((2))97–111
   Google Scholar
• Nind M., Hewett D. When age‐appropriateness isn’t appropriate. Whose choice? Contentious issues for those working with people with learning difficulties, Coupe O’Kane J, Goldbart J. David Fulton, London 1996; 48–57
   Google Scholar
• Porter J., Ouvry C., Morgan M., Downs C. Interpreting the communication of people with profound and multiple learning difficulties. British Journal of Learning Disability 2001; 29((1))12–16
   Google Scholar
• >QSR International. NVivo (Version 2.0.161) [Computer software]. QSR International Pty Ltd, MelbourneAustralia 1999–2002
   Google Scholar
• Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC, Reichle J, Beukelman D. R, Light J. C. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2002
   Google Scholar
• Siegel‐Causey E., Guess D. Enhancing nonsymbolic communication interactions among learners with severe disabilities. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore 1989
   Google Scholar
• Singh N. N., Lancioni G. E., Winton A. S. W., Molina E. J., Sage M., Brown S., et al. Effects of Snoezelen room, activities of daily living skills training, and vocational skills training on aggression and self‐injury by adults with mental retardation and mental illness. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2004; 25((3))285–293
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk J. 1989. The Sint‐Michielsgestel approach to diagnosis and education of multisensory impaired persons. Retrieved 19 December, 2005, from: www.dblink.org/lib/topics/vandijk7a.htm
   Google Scholar
• van Manen M. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Althouse, London, Ontario 1990
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp C., de Geeter K. I., Huijsmans L. M., Smit I. H. Passive activities: The effectiveness of multisensory environments on the level of activity of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2003; 16: 135–143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J. Ascertaining the views of people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disability 2004; 32((4))175–179
   Google Scholar