Looking back and going forward: what should the new European Commission do in order to promote evidence-based policy-making?

References

• Alemanno, A. 2010. The Fabulous Destiny of Bisphenol A: The Latest EU and WHO Moves. November 30, 2010. (Alemanno’s home page).
   Google Scholar
• Alemanno, A. 2011. Ban on Bisphenol A in Baby Bottles in the European Union as of Today (Alemanno’s home page).
   Google Scholar
• Alemanno, A. 2013a. Moment of Truth for Bisphenol A in the EU. April 3, 2013 (Alemanno’s home page).
   Google Scholar
• Alemanno, A. 2013b. “The Science, Law and Policy of Neonicotinoids and Bees: A New Test Case for the Precautionary Principle.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 4: 191–207.
   Google Scholar
• Alemanno, A. 2014. “What Role-If Any-for a Chief Scientist in the European Union System for Scientific Advice.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 5: 286–292.
   Google Scholar
• Autrup, H., F. Barile, B. Blauboer, G. Degen, W. Dekant, D. Dietrich, J. Domingo et al. 2015. “Principles of Pharmacology and Toxicology also Govern Effects of Chemicals on the Endocrine System.” Toxicological Sciences 146: 11–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, C. 2004. “What is Transparency?” Public Integrity 11: 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine, B. 2005. Enhancing the Role of Science in the Decision Making of the European Union. Brussels: European Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Bonefeld-Jørgensen, E., M. Long, M. Hofmeister, and A. Vinggaard. 2007. “Endocrine-Disrupting Potential of Bisphenol A, Bisphenol A Dimethacrylate, 4-N-Nonylphenol, and 4-N-Octylphenol in Vitro: New Data and a Brief Review.” Environmental Health Perspectives 115 (S-1): 69–76.10.1289/ehp.9368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouder, F., D. Way, R. Lofstedt, and D. Evensen. 2015. “Transparency in Europe: A Quantitative Study.” Risk Analysis. 35: 1210–1229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, J., and R. Hauser. 2011. “Bisphenol A and Childrenʼs Health.” Current Opinion in Pediatrics 23: 233–239.10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283445675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakwell, G. 2007. The Psychology of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819315
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, T. 2009. Science Suppressed: How America Became Obsessed with BPA. Washington, DC: George Mason University’s Center for Health and Risk Communication.
   Google Scholar
• CEO. 2014. Open Letter: The Position of the Chief Scientific Adviser to the President of the European Commission. 22nd July. Brussels: Corporate European Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Christoferou, T. 2003. “The Precautionary Principle in European Community Law and Science.” In Precaution, Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy, edited by J. Tickner, 241–262. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C. 2009. “The Transparency President? The Obama Administration and Open Government.” Governance 22: 529–544.10.1111/gove.2009.22.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C., H. Kilmartin, and E. Mendelson. 2008. Transparency and the Public Participation in the Rulemaking Process: A Non-partisan Presidential Task Force Report. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Corporate European Observatory. 2012. Conflicts on the Menu: A Decade of Industry Influence at the European Food Safety Authority. Brussels: CEO.
   Google Scholar
• Dalli, J. 2011. Pharmaceuticals: Today, the EU Register of Clinical Trials is launched online. 22nd March. Brussels: DG SANCO.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C., and C. Radaelli. 2015. “Impact Assessment in the European Union: Lessons from a Research Project.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 6: 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. 2014. The Battle of Scientists-Are Europeans Becoming More Hostile to Science and Technology? December 20.
   Google Scholar
• EurActiv. 2013. Chief EU Scientist Backs Damming Report Urging GMO ‘Rethink’. Brussels: EurActiv, September 26.
   Google Scholar
• EurActiv. 2014a. Sweden to Sue the Commission for Delaying Hormone-Affecting Criteria. Brussels: EurActiv, February 26.
   Google Scholar
• EurActiv. 2014b. EU’s Revamped Industrial Policy Dogged by ‘Better Regulation’ Dispute. Brussels: EurActiv, November 28.
   Google Scholar
• EurActiv. 2015. EU’s Food Safety Agency Gives Green Light to Bisphenol A. Accessed January 21, 2015. http://www.euractiv.com/sections/agriculture-food/eus-food-safety-agency-gives-green-light-bisphenol-311445
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2000. Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. Brussels: European Commission (COM 2000-1 Final).
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2007. Commission Communication Responding to Strategic Needs: Reinforcing the Use of Evaluation. Brussels: European Commission SEC 213.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2015a. Communication from Commission “Better Regulation for Better Results-an EU Agenda. Brussels: European Commission (COM 2015-215 Final).
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2015b. Press Release: President Juncker Welcomes World-leading Scientists, Discusses Role of Science in Competitiveness and Announces New Mechanism for Scientific Advice. Brussels: European Commission, May 13.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2013. Commission Communication “Strengthening the foundations of Smart Regulation-improving evaluation.” Brussels: European Commission (COM 2013-686 Final).
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2014. Commission Communication “Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT): State of play and outlook.” Brussels: European Commission (COM 2014-368 Final).
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2010. Cited in BBC News: EU Bans Bisphenol A Chemical from Babies’ Bottles. BBC News. Accessed November 26, 2010. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11843820.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2008. “Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids, and Materials in Contact with Food (AFC) Related to Toxicokinetics of Bisphenol A.” EFSA Journal 759: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2010. “Scientific Opinion on Bisphenol A: Evaluation of a Study Investigating Its Neurodevelopmental Toxicity, Review of Recent Scientific Literature on Its Toxicity and Advice on the Danish Risk Assessment of Bisphenol A.” EFSA Journal 8 (9): 1829–1945. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1829.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2013). “EFSA Supports European Commission in Defining Scientific Criteria for Endocrine Disruptors.” Press Release. Accessed March 20, 2013. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130320
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2014. Transformation to an Open EFSA. Parma: EFSA.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2015. No Consumer Health Risk from Bisphenol A Exposure. Press Release, January 21, 2015. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/150121.
   Google Scholar
• HOA (European Heads of Agency). 2012. “Heads of National Food Agencies Working Group on Transparent Use of Risk Assessment in Decision Making.” Final Report to the Heads of Agencies, April 2012. http://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/multimedia/pdfs/decision-making-docs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Medicines Agency. 2014. Publication of Clinical Reports: EMA Adopts Landmark Policy to Take Effect on 1st January 2015. EMA/601455/2104. London: EMA.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. 2007. Risk: Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. 2010. “New Regulatory Concepts and the Law.” In Risk and Regulatory Policy: Improving the Governance of Risk, edited by OECD, 45–92, Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A. 1999. “Does the Invisible Hand Need a Transparent Glove? The Politics of Transparency.” Paper in the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation) and WHO (World Health Organisation). 2010. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting to Review Toxicological and Health Aspects of Bisphenol A. November 2010. Ottawa: FAO/WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. D. 2001. “Decision-analytic Refinements of the Precautionary Principle.” Journal of Risk Research 4: 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. D. 2010. “Why Governments need Guidelines for Risk Assessment and Management.” In OECD Review of Regulatory Reform-Risk and Regulatory Policy: Improving the Governance of Risk, edited by OECD, 237–247. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Girling, J. 2013. “Commentary on Lofstedt Working Group Paper.” Risk Analysis 33: 1188–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girling, J. 2014. “The Role of Science in the 21st Century EU Policy Making.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 5: 300–302.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, A. 2014. 1000 days in the Life of a Chief Scientific Adviser. Auckland, New Zealand, 28th August.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, A. 2015a. “Anne Glover on Brussels: A moment of magic realism in the European Commission.” The Guardian, February 5.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, A. 2015b. “Greenpeace hypocritical, says ousted EU scientist.” The Times, February 7.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Julie E., E. McConnell, I. Sipes, R. Witorsch, T. Slayton, C. Yu, A. Lewis, and L. Rhomberg. 2006. “An Updated Weight of the Evidence Evaluation of Reproductive and Developmental Effects of Low Doses of Bisphenol A.” Critical Reviews in Toxicology 36: 387–457.10.1080/10408440600758317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, G., J. Cohen, G. Cunha, C. Hughes, E. McConnell, L. Rhomberg, I. Sipes, and D. Mattison. 2004. “Weight of the Evidence Evaluation of Low-Dose Reproductive and Developmental Effects of Bisphenol A.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 10: 875–921.10.1080/10807030490513883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, L. E., B. Ryan, A. Hotchkiss, and K. Crofton. 2010. “Rebuttal of “Flawed Experimental Design Reveals the Need for Guidelines Requiring Appropriate Positive Controls in Endocrine Disruption Research” by Vom Saal.” Toxicological Sciences 115: 614–620.10.1093/toxsci/kfq073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heald, D. 2006. “Varieties of Transparency.” In Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? edited by C. Hood and D. Heald, 25–43. London: Proceedings of the British Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Health Canada. 2008. Government of Canada Protects Families with Bisphenol A Regulations. Ottawa: Health Canada, October 17, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lakind, J., M. Goodman, and D. Naiman. 2012. “Use of NHANES Data to Link Chemical Exposures to Chronic Diseases: A Cautionary Tale.” PLoS ONE 1: 712e51086. 10.1371/journal.pone.0051086. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3515548/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., J. Kim, J. Chung, Y. Kim, J. Park, S. Oh, Y. Yoon, K. Yoo, Y. Yoo, and J. Kim. 2013. “Bisphenol A Exposure during Adulthood Causes Augmentation of Follicular Atresia and Luteal Regression by Decreasing 17β-Estradiol Synthesis via Downregulation of Aromatase in Rat Ovary.” Environmental Health Perspectives 121: 663–669. doi:10.1289/ehp.1205823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. E. 2004. “The Swing of the Regulatory Pendulum in Europe: From Precautionary Principle to (Regulatory) Impact Analysis.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28: 237–260.10.1023/B:RISK.0000026097.72268.8d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. 2005. Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave/MacMillan.10.1057/9780230503946
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. 2010. “Risk Communication Guidelines for Europe: A Modest Proposition.” Journal of Risk Research 13: 87–109.10.1080/13669870903126176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. E. 2011a. “Risk versus Hazard: How to Regulate in the 21st Century.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 2: 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. 2011b. Reclaiming Health and Safety for all: An Independent Review of Health and Safety Legislation. London: Department of Work and Pensions.
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. 2013a. “Communicating Food Risks in an Era of Growing Public Distrust: Three Case Studies.” Risk Analysis 33 (2): 192–202.10.1111/risk.2013.33.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. E. 2013b. “The Informal European Parliamentary Working Group on Risk-History, Remit, and Future Plans: A Personal View.” Risk Analysis 33: 1182–1187.10.1111/risa.2013.33.issue-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. E. 2014a. “Chemical Control Policy in Sweden, What is Next?” European Journal of Risk Regulation 5: 351–358.
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. E. 2014b. “The Precautionary Principle in the EU: Why a Formal Review is Long Overdue.” Risk Management 16: 137–163.10.1057/rm.2014.7
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R., and F. Bouder. 2014. “New Transparency Policies: Risk Communication’s Doom?” In Effective Risk Communication, edited by J. Arvai and L. Rivers, 73–90. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G., and M. Everson. 2001. “Institutional Reform: Independent Agencies, Oversight, Coordination and Procedural Control.” In Governance in the European Union, edited by O. DeSchutter, N. Lebessis and J. Paterson, 129–168. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, G., L. Abbott, A. Felsot, and R. Griffin. 2013. Impact of the Precautionary Principle on Feeding Current and Future Generations. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, CAST issue paper no. 52.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. 2009. “Understanding Modern Transparency.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75: 255–269.10.1177/0020852309104175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melzer, D., N. Rice, C. Lewis, W. Henley, and T. Galloway. 2010. “Association of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration with Heart Disease: Evidence from NHANES 2003/06.” PLoS ONE 5 (1): e8673.10.1371/journal.pone.0008673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, S C, F. vom Saal, K. Thayer, M. Dhar, and M Boechler. 1997. “Relative Binding Affinity-Serum Modified Access (RBA-SMA) Assay Predicts the Relative in Vivo Bioactivity of the Xenoestrogens Bisphenol A and Octylphenol.” Environmental Health Perspectives 105: 70–76.10.1289/ehp.9710570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2001. Digital Divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164887
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, O. 2013. Speech on the Benefits of Genetically Modified Crops. June 21.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, O. 2014. Growing Voices: Health Food-the Untold Story of GM Crops. January 24.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, O. 2015. Speech: Annual South African Agricultural Biotechnology Industry ISAAA Media Conference, Pretoria, South Africa, February 24.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M., and G. Shaffer. 2009. When Cooperation Fails. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199237289.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Pollit, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pott, A. 2015. Your own initiative inquiry OI/3/2014 (BEH)FOR.EMA/55447/2015. London: EMA.
   Google Scholar
• Rasi, G. 2013. “Clinical Data: Time for a New Approach.” Financial Times, April 30, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Renda, A. 2006. Impact Assessment in the EU: The State of the Art and the Art of the State. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Renda, A., L. Schrefler, G. Luchestta, and R. Zavatta. 2013. Analysing the Costs and Benefits of Regulation: Study for the European Commission, Secretariat General. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, C., L. Birnbaum, F. Farabollini, R. Newbold, B. Rubin, C. Talsness, J. Vandenberg, D. Walser-Kuntz, and F. vom Saal. 2007. “In Vivo Effects of Bisphenol A in Laboratory Rodent Studies.” Reproductive Toxicology 24: 199–224.10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., N. Holland, D. Leloup, and H. Muilerman. 2013. “Conflicts of Interest at the European Food Safety Authority Erode Public Confidence.” Journal of Epidemiology Community Health 67: 717–720. doi:10.1136/jech-2012-202185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochester, J. 2013. “Bisphenol A and Human Health: A Review of the Literature.” Reproductive Toxicology 42: 132–155.10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vom Saal, F., B. Akingbemi, S. Belcher, L. Birnbaum, D. Crain, M. Eriksen, F. Farabollini, et al. 2007. “Chapel Hill Bisphenol A Expert Panel Consensus Statement: Integration of Mechanisms, Effects in Animals and Potential to Impact Human Health at Current Levels of Exposure.” Reproductive Toxicology 24: 131–138.10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vom Saal, F., and C. Hughes. 2005. “An Extensive New Literature concerning Low-Dose Effects of Bisphenol A Shows the Need for a New Risk Assessment.” Environmental Health Perspectives 113: 926–933.10.1289/ehp.7713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, H., and P. Wiedemann. 2000. “Hazardous Incident Information for the Public: Is It Useful?” Australiasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies 2000 (2): 1174–xxxx.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, R. 2010. “Is It Time to End Concerns over the Estrogenic Effects of Bisphenol A?” Toxicological Sciences 114: 1–4.10.1093/toxsci/kfp299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smismans, S. 2015. “Policy Evaluation in the EY: The Challenges of Linking Ex Ante and Ex Post Appraisal.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 6: 6–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Chemicals Agency. 2015. Arsredovisning 2014. Sundbyberg: Swedish Chemicals Agency. (annual report 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Ministry of the Environment. 2013. Pa vag mot en giftfri vardag-platform for kemikaliepolitiken [Toward Non-toxic Living: A Platform for Chemical Policy]. Stockholm: Swedish Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Teeguarden, J., and S. Hanson-Drury. 2013. “A Systematic Review of Bisphenol A “Low Dose” Studies in the Context of Human Exposure: A Case for Establishing Standards for Reporting “Low-Dose” Effects of Chemicals.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 62: 935–948.10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Endocrine Society. 2009. “Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.” Position Statement, June 2009. Maryland: The Endocrine Society.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, F. 2015. Better Regulation Agenda: Enhancing Transparency and Scrutiny for Better EU Law Making-Press Release. Brussels: European Commission, 19th May.
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Business Innovation and Skills. 2013. Cut EU Red Tape: Report from the Business Taskforce. London: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, L., I. Chahoud, J. Heindel, V. Padmanabhan, F. Paumgartten, and G. Schoenfelder. 2010. “Urinary, Circulating, and Tissue Biomonitoring Studies Indicate Widespread Exposure to Bisphenol A.” Environmental Health Perspectives 118 (8): 1055–1070.10.1289/ehp.0901716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. 2009. “The Politics of Plastics: The Making and Unmaking of Bisphenol A “Safety”.” American Journal of Public Health 99: S559–S566.10.2105/AJPH.2008.159228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogel, D. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wall Street Journal. 2014. Juncker Science, December 2, p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., J. Hua, M. Chen, Y. Xia, Q. Zhang, R. Zhao, W. Zhou, Z. Zhang and B. Wang. 2012. “High Urinary Bisphenol A Concentrations in Workers and Possible Laboratory Abnormalities.” Occupational and Environmental Medicine 69: 679–684. Published online May 5, 2012. doi:10.1136/oemed-2011-100529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallstrom, M. 2002. EU and US approaches to environmental policy. Speech given at the European Institute, Washington DC, April 25.
   Google Scholar
• Way, D., and R. Lofstedt. 2015. When is transparency satisfied? Comparing transparency policies at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Article is under peer review.
   Google Scholar
• Wemmert, L., and M. Karlsson. 2013. “Sverige bor folja Frankrike och forbjuda bisfenol A [Sweden should follow France and ban Bisphenol A].” Svenska Dagbladet, January 17.
   Google Scholar
• Westlund, A. 2013. Compromise Amendments: Protection of Public Health from Endocrine Disrupters. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, J. 2010. “Risk Regulation and Governance Institutions.” In OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform-Risk and Regulatory Policy: Improving the Governance of Risk, edited by OECD, 133–157. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, J. 2015. “EU Commission urged to act on French BPA ban.” Food Quality News, February 5.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J. 2014. “The Past, Present and Future of the Chief Scientific Advisor.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 5: 293–299.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organisation). 2012. State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals 2012. World Health Organisation. ISBN: 978 92 4 150503 1 (WHO). www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/78101/1/9789241505031.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, J. 2010. The Application of the Precautionary Principle in Practice: Comparative Dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zoeller, R., A. Bergman, G. Becher, P. Bjerregaard, R. Bornman, I. Brandt, T. Iguchi, et al. 2014. “A Path forward over Health Impacts of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals.” Environmental Health 14: 118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar