Individual variation in agrammatism: a single case study of the influence of interaction

References

• Auer P. Referential problems in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 1984; 8: 627–648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse R. Broca's aphasia: a syntactic and/or a morphological disorder? A case study. Brain and Language 1995; 48: 1–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse R., Edwards S., Rispens J. Verb and Sentence Test. 2002, (Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds)
   Google Scholar
• Beeke S., Wilkinson R., Maxim J. Exploring aphasic grammar 2: do language testing and conversation tell a similar story?. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2003a; 17: 109–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke S., Wilkinson R., Maxim J. Exploring aphasic grammar 1: a single case analysis of conversation. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2003b; 17: 81–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke S., Wilkinson R., Maxim J. Grammar without sentence structure: a conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology 2006, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Berndt R. S., Haendiges A. N., Mitchum C. C., Sandson J. Verb retrieval in aphasia 2. relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language 1997; 56: 107–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards S. A clinical assessment of verbs in an agrammatic patient. Grammatical Disorders in Aphasia, R Bastiaanse, Y Grodzinsky. Whurr, London 2000; 191–213
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher M., Birt D. Storylines: Picture Sequences for Language Practice. Longman, London 1983
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H. Agrammatism. Studies in Neurolinguistics, H Whitaker, H. A Whitaker. Academic Press, New York, NY 1976; 1
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H., Kaplan E. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders, 2nd edn. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H., Gleason J. B., Bernholtz N. A., Hyde M. R. Some linguistic structures in the speech of a Broca's aphasic. Cortex 1972; 8: 191–212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodwin C. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press, New York, NY 1981
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen C., Schegloff E. Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: on the role of so‐called telegraphic style in talk‐in‐interaction. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 365–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeschen C., Schegloff E. Aphasic agrammatism as interactional artifact and achievement. Conversation and Brain Damage, C Goodwin. Oxford University Press, New York, NY 2003; 231–282
   Google Scholar
• Helasvuo M. ‐L. Emerging syntax for interaction. Studies in Interactional Linguistics, M Selting, E Couper‐Kuhlen. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2001; 25–50
   Google Scholar
• Helasvuo M. ‐L., Klippi A., Laakso M. Grammatical structuring in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia in Finnish. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2001; 14: 231–254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage J. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity, Cambridge 1984
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede B., Kolk H. H. J. The effects of task variation on the production of grammatical morphology in Broca's aphasia: a multiple case study. Brain and Language 1994; 46: 278–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby I., Wooffitt R. Conversation Analysis. Polity, Cambridge 1998
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G. A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped, tag‐positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 1973; 9: 47–96
   Google Scholar
• Kay J., Lesser R., Coltheart M. Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia, PALPA. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove 1992
   Google Scholar
• Kolk H. The malleability of agrammatic symptoms and its implications for therapy. Linguistic Levels in Aphasiology, E. G Visch‐Brink, R Bastiaanse. Singular, San Diego, CA 1998; 193–209
   Google Scholar
• Kolk H., Heeschen C. Adaptation symptoms and impairment symptoms in Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology 1990; 4: 221–231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk H., Heeschen C. Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes 1992; 7: 89–129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser R., Milroy L. Linguistics and Aphasia: Psycholinguistic and Pragmatic Aspects of Intervention. Longman, London 1993
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J. Assessment and treatment of sentence processing disorders: a review of the literature. The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders: Integrating Cognitive Neuropsychology, Neurology, and Rehabilitation, A. E Hillis. Psychology Press, New York, NY 2002; 351–372
   Google Scholar
• Myerson R., Goodglass H. Transformational grammars of three agrammatic patients. Language and Speech 1972; 15: 40–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespoulous J. ‐L., Code C., Virbel J., Lecours A. R. Hypotheses on the dissociation between ‘referential’ and ‘modalizing’ verbal behaviour in aphasia. Applied Psycholinguistics 1998; 19: 311–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interaction and Grammar, E Ochs, E. A Schegloff, S. A Thompson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H., Schegloff E. A., Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn‐taking for conversation. Language 1974; 50: 696–735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salis C., Edwards S. Adaptation theory and non‐fluent aphasia in English. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 1103–1120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A. The relevance of repair to syntax‐for‐conversation. Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, T Givon. Academic Press, New York, NY 1979; 261–286
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. Conversation analysis and communication disorders. Conversation and Brain Damage, C Goodwin. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003; 21–55
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin D. Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz M. F., Fink R. B., Saffran E. M. The modular treatment of agrammatism. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1995; 5: 93–127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer L., Huber W., Schlenck K. ‐J., Schlenck C. Agrammatism: deficit or compensation? Consequences for aphasia therapy. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2000; 10: 279–309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson S. A., Mulac A. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers, E. C Traugott, B Heine. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 1991; 313–329
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D. When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: toward a dual‐process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2004; 39: 1–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth A. Thematic Roles in Production, TRIP: An Assessment of Word Retrieval at the Sentence Level. Whurr, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson R. Aphasia: conversation analysis of a non‐fluent aphasic person. Case Studies in Clinical Linguistics, M Perkins, S Howard. Whurr, London 1995; 271–292
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson R., Maxim J., Beeke S. Available at: www.esrc.ac.uk. R000222754: An Investigation of Aphasic Syntax‐for‐Conversation: Final Report. Economic and Social Research Council, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Wray A., Perkins M. R. The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model. Language and Communication 2000; 20: 1–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar