Deaf teenagers with cochlear implants in conversation with hearing peers

References

• Arnold P., Palmer C., Lloyd J. Hearing‐impaired children's listening skills in a referential communication task: an exploratory study. Deafness and Education International 1999; 1: 47–55
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D., Adams C. What do referential communication tasks measure? A study of children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 1991; 12: 199–215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinton B., Fujiki M. A comparison of request–response sequences in the discourse of normal and language‐disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1982; 47: 57–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caissie R., Gibson C. L. The effectiveness of repair strategies used by people with hearing losses and their conversational partners. Volta Review 1997; 99: 203–218
   Google Scholar
• Caissie R., Rockwell E. A videotape analysis procedure for assessing conversational fluency in hearing‐impaired adults. Ear and Hearing 1993; 14: 202–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caissie R., Rockwell E. Communication difficulties experienced by nursing home residents with a hearing loss during conversation with staff members. Speech–Language Pathology and Audiology 1994; 18: 127–134
   Google Scholar
• Caissie R., Wilson E. Communication breakdown management during cooperative learning activities by mainstreamed students with hearing losses. Volta Review 1995; 97: 105–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue M., Pearl R., Bryan T. Learning disabled children's conversational competence: Response to inadequate messages. Applied Psycholinguistics 1980; 1: 387–404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber N. Communication Therapy for Adults with Sensory Loss. Clavis, Melbourne 1996, 2nd edn
   Google Scholar
• Gagné J.‐P., Stelmacovich P., Yovetich W. Reactions to requests for clarification used by hearing‐impaired individuals. Volta Review 1991; 93: 129–143
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher T. Contingent query sequences within adult–child discourse. Journal of Child Language 1981; 8: 51–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers A., Brenner C., Nicholas J., Tye‐Murray N., Tobey E. Educational factors contributing to cochlear implant benefit in children. International Congress Series 2003; 1254: 307–312
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg S., Krauss R. What do people say after they have learned to talk? Studies of the development of referential communication. Merrill‐Palmer Quarterly 1967; 13: 309–316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception thresholds in quiet and noise. Scandinavian Audiology 1995; 24: 71–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagesäter C., Thern A. Taluppfattning och arbetsminne hos normalhörande, normalspråkiga sju‐ och nioåringar. 2002, Master's thesis in Logopedics, Department of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University
   Google Scholar
• Jeanes R., Nienhuys G., Rickards F. The pragmatic skills of profoundly deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2000; 5: 237–247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirk K., Miyamoto R., Ying E., Perdew A., Zuganelis H. Cochlear implantation in young children: effects of age at implantation and communication mode. Volta Review 2002; 102: 127–144
   Google Scholar
• Leinonen E., Letts C. Referential communication tasks: performance by normal and pragmatically impaired children. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1997; 32: 53–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linell P. Approaching Dialogue. Talk and Interaction in Dialogical Perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam 1998
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd J., Lieven E., Arnold P. The oral referential communication skills of hearing‐impaired children. Deafness and Education International 2005; 7: 22–42
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd P. Referential communication: assessment and intervention. Topics in Language Disorders 1994; 14: 55–69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2000, 3rd edn
   Google Scholar
• Merrison S., Merrison A. J. Repair in speech and language therapy interaction: Investigating pragmatic language impairment of children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2005; 21: 191–211
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni D., Cleary M. Measures of working memory span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing 2003; 24: 106–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni D., Kronenberger W., Conway C., Horn D., Karpicke J., Henning S. Efficacy and effectiveness of cochlear implants in deaf children. Deaf Cognition: Foundations and Outcomes, M Marschark, P Hauser. Oxford University Press, New York, NY 2008
   Google Scholar
• Preisler G., Tvingstedt A.‐L., Ahlström M. A psychosocial follow‐up study of deaf preschool children using cochlear implants. Child: Care, Health and Development 2002; 28: 403–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preisler G., Tvingstedt A.‐L., Ahlström M. Interviews with deaf children about their experiences using cochlear implants. American Annals of the Deaf 2005; 150: 260–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuterskiöld Wagner C., Nettelbladt U., Sahlén B. Giving the crucial information: performance on a referential communication task in Swedish children with language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2001; 36: 433–445
   Google Scholar
• Sarant J., Blamey P., Dowell R., Clark G., Gibson W. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 2001; 22: 18–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye‐Murray N. Conversational fluency of children who use cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing 2003; 24((Suppl.))S82–S89
   Google Scholar
• Tye‐Murray N., Witt S. Conversational moves and conversational styles of adult cochlear‐implant users. Journal of the Academy of the Rehabilitative Audiology 1996; 29: 11–25
   Google Scholar
• Tye‐Murray N., Witt S., Schum L. Effects of talker familiarity on communication breakdown in conversations with adult cochlear‐implant users. Ear and Hearing 1995; 16: 459–469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchanski R., Geers A. Acoustic characteristics of speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal hearing‐age mates. Ear and Hearing 2003; 24: 90–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wass M., Hällgren M., Ibertsson T., Larsby B., Sahlén B. Sound information processing system. Department of Behavioral Science, Linköping University, Linköping 2007, Manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Willstedt‐Svensson U., Löfqvist A., Almqvist B., Sahlén B. Is age at implant the only factor that counts? The influence of working memory on lexical and grammatical development in children with cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology 2004; 43: 506–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar