Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Identifying sources of understandability problems

References

• Barefoot S. M., Bochner J. H., Johnson B. A., Van Eigen B. A. Rating deaf speakers' comprehensibility: An exploratory investigation. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 1993; 2: 31–35
   Google Scholar
• Beeke S., Wilkinson R., Maxim J. Individual variation in agrammatism: a single case study of the influence of interaction. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2007; 42: 629–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch S. Co‐constructing meaning in dysarthria: word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. Applying Conversation Analysis, K Richards, P Seedhouse. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2005; 38–55
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S., Wilkinson R. The understandability of AAC: a conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004; 20: 272–282
   Google Scholar
• Collins S., Markova I. Complementarity in the construction of a problematic utterance in conversation. Mutualities in Dialogue, I Markova, C. F Graumann, K Foppa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995; 238–263
   Google Scholar
• D'Innocenzo J., Tjaden K., Greenman G. Intelligibility in dysarthria: effects of listener familiarity and speaking condition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 659–675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais P. A., Brown G. R., Moore R. E. Speech rate effects upon intelligibility and acceptability of dysarthric speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 141–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley F. L., Aronson A. E., Brown J. R. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1969a; 12: 246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darley F. L., Aronson A. E., Brown J. R. Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1969b; 12: 462
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drew P. ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 1997; 28: 69–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy J. R. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. Elsevier Mosby, St Louis, MO 2005
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P. Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment. College Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Garcia J. M., Crowe L. K., Redler D. Effects of spontaneous gestures on comprehension and intelligibility of dysarthric speech: a case report. Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology 2004; 12: 145–148
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Conversational organization — Interaction between Hearers and Speakers. Academic Press, New York, NY 1981
   Google Scholar
• Hanson E., Yorkston K., Beukelman D. Speech supplementation techniques for dysarthria: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology 2004; 12: ix–xxix
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J. A change‐of‐state token and aspects of its sequential placement. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M Atkinson, J Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984; 299–345
   Google Scholar
• Hillel A., Miller R., Yorkston K., McDonald E., Norris E., Konikow N. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis severity scale. Journal of Neuroepidemiology 1989; 8: 142–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C. Estimating the intelligibility of speakers with dysarthria. Folia Phoniatricia Logopaedica 2006; 58: 217–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C. Contribution of two sources of listener knowledge to intelligibility of speakers with cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2007; 50: 1228–1240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C., Dardis C. M., McCourt K. A. Effects of visual information on intelligibility of open and closed class words in predictable sentences produced by speakers with dysarthria. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2007; 21: 353–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C., Weismer G. A continuum of interventions for individuals with dysarthria. Motor Speech Disorders: Essays for Ray Kent, G Weismer. Plural, San Diego, CA 2007; 261–303
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G. Transcript notation. Structures of Social Action, J. M Atkinson, J Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984; ix–xvi
   Google Scholar
• Liss J. M. The role of speech perception in motor speech disorders. Motor Speech Disorders, G Weismer. Plural, San Diego, CA 2007; 187–219
   Google Scholar
• Lock S., Wilkinson R., Bryan K. SPPARC (Supporting Partners of People with Aphasia in Relationships and Conversation): A Resource Pack. Speechmark, Bicester 2001
   Google Scholar
• Perkins L., Whitworth A., Lesser R. Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Cognitive Impairment. Whurr, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H. Notes on methodology. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M Atkinson, J Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984; 21–27
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 2000; 21: 205–243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E., Jefferson G., Sacks H. The preference for self‐correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 1977; 53: 361–382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E., Sacks H. Opening up closings. Semiotica 1973; 7: 289–327
   Google Scholar
• Stribling P., Rae J., Dickerson P. Two forms of spoken repetition in a girl with autism. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2007; 42: 427–444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth A., Perkins L., Lesser R. Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Aphasia. Whurr, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson R. Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 327–343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston K., Strand E., Kennedy M. Comprehensibility of dysarthric speech: implications for assessment and treatment planning. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 1996; 5: 55–66
   Google Scholar