The Voice Handicap Index with post-laryngectomy male voices

References

• Blalock D. Speech rehabilitation after treatment of laryngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 1997; 30: 179–188
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Otorhinolaryngologists Head and Neck Surgeons (BAOHNS). Effective Head and Neck Cancer Management. British Association of Otorhinolaryngologists Head and Neck Surgeons (BAOHNS), London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Carr M. M., Schmidbauer J. A., Majaess L., Smith R. L. Communication after laryngectomy: an assessment of quality of life. Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery 2000; 122: 39–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• Delsupehe K., Zink I., Lejaegere M., Delaere P. Prospective randomized comparative study of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: Blom-Singer versus Provox. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 1561–1565
   Google Scholar
• DeSanto L. W., Olsen K. D., Perry W. C., Rohe D. E., Keith R. L. Quality of life after surgical treatment of cancer of the larynx. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1995; 104: 763–769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie T. L., Doyle P. C. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 753–759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrand P., Duncan F. Generic health-related quality of life amongst patients employing different voice restoration methods following total laryngectomy. Psychology, Health and Medicine 2007; 12: 255–265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobson B. H., Johnson A., Grywalski C., Silbergleit A., Jacobson G., Benninger M. S., Newman C. W. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 1997; 6: 66–70
   Google Scholar
• Kazi R., Kiverniti E., Prasad V., Venkitaraman R., Nutting C. M., Clarke P., Rhys-Evans P., Harrington K. J. Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech. Clinical Otolaryngology 2006; 31: 511–517
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee-Preston V., Steen I. N., Dear A., Kelly C. G., Welch A. R., Meikle D., Stafford F. W., Wilson J. A. Optimizing the assessment of quality of life after laryngeal cancer treatment. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 2004; 118: 432–438
   Google Scholar
• Max L., De Bruyn W., Steurs W. Intelligibility of oesophageal and tracheo-oesophageal speech: preliminary observations. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1997; 32: 429–440
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Max L., Steurs W., De Bruyn W. Vocal capacities in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 93–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe M. J., Ward E. C., Bassett L., Perkins K. Functional speech outcomes after laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy. Archives of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery 2000; 126: 705–709
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moerman M., Martens J.-P., Dejonckere P. Application of the Voice Handicap Index in 45 patients with substitution voicing after total laryngectomy. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2004; 261: 423–428
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Op de Coul B. M., Ackerstaff A. H., Van As C. J., Van Den Hoogen F. J., Meeuwis C. A., Manni J. J., Hilgers F. J. Quality of life assessment in laryngectomized individuals: do we need additions to standard questionnaires in specific clinical research projects?. Clinical Otolaryngology 2005; 30: 169–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Op de Coul B. M., Hilgers F. J., Balm A. J., Tan I. B., Van Den Hoogen F. J., Van Tinteren H. A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single institution's experience with consistent application of Provox indwelling voice prostheses. Archives of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery 2000; 126: 1320–1328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuster M., Lohscheller J., Hoppe U., Kummer P., Eysholdt U., Rosanowski F. Voice handicap of laryngectomees with tracheoesophageal speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica 2004; 56: 62–67
   Google Scholar
• Schuster M., Toy H., Lohscheller J., Eysholdt U., Rosanowski F. Quality of life and voice handicap of laryngectomees using tracheoesophageal substitute voice. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2005; 84: 101–107
   Google Scholar
• Sewnaik A., Van Den Brink J. L., Wieringa M. H., Meeuwis C. A., Kerrebijn J. D. Surgery for recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy: partial laryngectomy or total laryngectomy for a better quality of life?. Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery 2005; 132: 95–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer M. I., Blom E. D., Hamaker R. C. Vocal rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 1985; 18: 605–611
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stafford F. W. Current indications and complications of tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration after laryngectomy. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 2003; 11: 89–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart M. G., Chen A. Y., Stach C. B. Outcomes analysis of voice and quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer. Archives of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery 1998; 124: 143–148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward E. C., Koh S. K., Frisby J., Hodge R. Differential modes of alaryngeal communication and long-term voice outcomes following pharyngolaryngectomy and laryngectomy. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica 2003; 55: 39–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992; 30: 473–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh Language Act, 1993, Welsh Language Act (c.38) (available at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1993/Ukpga_19930038_en_1.htm).
   Google Scholar