1,906
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

French and Swedish teachers' social representations of social workers

Représentations sociales des travailleurs sociaux chez les enseignants français et suédois

, , &

References

  • Abric, J. C. (1976). Jeux, conflits et représentations sociales [Games, conflict and social representations] (Dissertation thesis). Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence.
  • Abric, J. C. (1994). Méthodologie de recueil des représentations sociales [Methodology of miscellaneous social representations]. In J. C. Abric (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentations [Social practices and representations] (pp. 59–82). Paris: P.U.F.
  • Abric, J. C. (2003). Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales [Methods to study social representations]. Paris: Editions Erès.
  • Bergmark, Å., Lundström, T., Minas, R., & Wiklund, S. (2008). Socialtjänsten i blickfånget [Social work in focus]. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Bronstein, L. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48(3), 297–306. doi:10.1093/sw/48.3.297
  • Byrne, D., & Taylor, B. (2007). Children at risk from domestic violence and their educational attainment: Perspectives of education welfare officers, social workers and teachers. Child Care in Practice, 13(3), 185–201. doi:10.1080/13575270701353465
  • Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal,Vol. Complex Systems, pp. 1695–1704.
  • Danermark, B. (2002). Samverkan – himmel eller helvete? [Collaboration – heaven or hell?] Stockholm: Gleerups förlag.
  • Danermark, B., & Kullberg, C. (1997). Samverkan. Välfärdsstatens nya arbetsform [Collaboration. The new work-system of the welfare state]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Danermark, B., Englund, U., & Germundsson, P. (2010). Skolans arbete med utsatta barn – ett samverkansperspektiv. Rapport till utredningen “Översyn av skolans arbete med utsatta barn”. I SOU 2010:95 Se, tolka och agera – allas rätt till en likvärdig utbildning. Bilaga 4 [The school's work with children at risk: A collaborative perspective. Report of the investigation “Review of the school's work with children at risk”. In SOU 2010:95 See, interpret and act – The right of all to an equivalent education (pp. 393–465)]. Swedish Ministry of Education and Research.
  • Degenne, A., & Vergès, P. (1973). Introduction à l'analyse de similitude [Introduction to similarities analysis]. Revue française de sociologie, 14(4), 471–512. doi:10.2307/3320247
  • Flament, C. (1965). Théorie des graphes et structures sociales [The theory of graphs and social structures]. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
  • Flament, C., & Rouquette, M. L. (2003). Anatomie des idées ordinaires, comment étudier les représentations sociales [The anatomy of ordinary ideas, how to study social representations]. Paris: Armant Colin.
  • Germundsson, P. (2011). Lärare, socialsekreterare och barn som far illa. Om sociala representationer och interprofessionell samverkan [Teachers, social workers and children at risk. On social representations and interprofessional collaboration] (Dissertation thesis). Örebro University, Örebro.
  • Glendinning, C., & Rummery, K. (2003). Collaboration between primary health and social care. From policy to practice in developing services for older people. In A. Leathard (Ed.), Interprofessional collaboration. From policy to practice in health and social care (pp. 186–199). Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate. The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Jodelet, D. (1989). Représentations sociales: un domaine en expansion [Social representations: A domain in expansion]. In D. Jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales [Social representations] (pp. 47–78). Paris: P.U.F.
  • Keast, R., Mandell, M. P. Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363–371. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00380.x
  • Lacey, P. (2000). Multidisciplinary work challenges and possibilities. In H. Daniels (Ed.), Special education re-formed. Beyond rhetoric? (pp. 157–172). London: Falmer Press.
  • Leathard, A. (Ed.). (2003). Interprofessional collaboration. From policy to practice in health and social care. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
  • Mankin, D., Cohen, S., & Fitzgerald, S. P. (2004). Developing complex collaboration. Basic principles to guide design and implementation. In M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Complex collaboration. Building the capabilities for working across boundaries (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Martín-Rodriguez, L., Beauliu, M.-D., & Ferrada-Videla, M. (2005). The determinants of successful collaboration: A review of theoretical and empirical studies. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(Suppl. 1), 132–147. doi:10.1080/13561820500082677
  • McConkey, R. (2002). Reciprocal working by education, health and social services: Lessons for a less-travelled road. British Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 3–8. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00230
  • Meads, G., & Ashcroft, J. (2005) The case for interprofessional collaboration. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Meeuwisse, A., Sunesson, S., & Swärd, H. (Eds.). (2006). Socialt arbete. En grundbok [Social work. A foundation book]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
  • Mias, C. (1998). L'implication professionnelle dans le travail social [The professional involvement in social work]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
  • Ministère de l’éducation nationale. (2009). Assistant(e) de service social [Social worker] [Online]. Retrieved April, 2012, from http://www.education.gouv.fr/cid1073/assistant-e-de-service-social.html
  • Moscovici, S. (1976). La psychanalyse, son image, son public [Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public] (2nd ed.). Paris: P.U.F.
  • Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. New York, NY: University Press.
  • Moscovici, S., & Doise, W. (1994). Conflict and consensus. A general theory of collective decision. London: Sage.
  • Nowell, B. (2009). Profiling capacity for coordination and systems change: The relative contribution of stakeholder relationships in interorganizational collaboratives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3–4), 196–212. doi:10.1007/s10464-009-9276-2
  • Ødegård, A., & Strype, J. (2009). Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration within child mental health care in Norway. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(3), 286–296. doi:10.1080/13561820902739981
  • Piaser, A. (1999). Représentations professionnelles à l’école. Particularités selon le statut: enseignant, inspecteur [Professionals’ representations of education. Characteristics according to status: Teachers, inspectors] (Dissertation thesis). Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail, Toulouse.
  • Qvarsell, R. (2003). CSA och socialpolitiken kring sekelskiftet 1900 [CSA and social policy at the turn of the century]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 10(2–3), 117–130.
  • Ratinaud, P. (2009). IRaMuTeQ: Interface de R pour les Analyses multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires [IRaMuTeQ: R interface for multidimensional analysis of texts and questionnaires] [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.iramuteq.org
  • Ratinaud, P., & Piaser, A. (Eds.). (2010). Pensée sociale, pensée professionnelle. Les Dossiers des Sciences de l'Education [Social thought, professional thought. Records of education sciences]. Toulouse: PUM.
  • R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
  • Russel, P. F., & Rao, T. R. (1940). On habitat and association of species of anopheline larvae in southeastern, Madras. Journal of Malaria Institute in India, 3(1), 153–178.
  • Social Services Act, 2001:453. Ministry of Social Affairs.
  • Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across boundaries. Collaboration in public services. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Thévenet, A., & Designaux, J. (1985). Les travailleurs sociaux [The social workers]. Paris: P.U.F.
  • Verges, P. (1992). L'évocation de l'argent: une méthode pour la définition du noyau central d'une représentation [The evocation of money: A method for defining the central nucleus of a representation]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 45(405), 203–209.
  • Willumsen, E. (2006). Interprofessional collaboration in residential childcare (dissertation thesis). The Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.