Consensus or contention: an exploration of multidisciplinary team functioning in an Irish mental health context

References

• Armstrong, C., de Burca, S., Flood, P., & MacCurtain, S. (2007). Community mental health teams: Determinants of effectiveness ( Working Paper). Limerick: University of Limerick.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. (2012). Interdisciplinary working in mental health. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, H. (2005). Interprofessional education: Today, yesterday and tomorrow. London: Centre for Health Sciences and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences ( 7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Biggerstaff, D., & Thompson, A. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as a method of choice for research in health care settings. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 173–183. 10.1080/14780880802314304
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, S., & Engstrom, I. (2012). Interprofessional psychiatric teams: Is multidimensionality evident in treatment conferences? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26, 289–296. 10.3109/13561820.2012.676108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, S. (2005). Mental health social work in Ireland: Missed opportunities. In N. Kearney & C. Skehill (Eds.), Social work in Ireland: Historical perspectives (pp. 33–50). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., & Onyett, S. (2010). Teamwork within mental health services in Ireland: Resource paper. Dublin: Mental Health Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, A., Bendelow, G., Fulford, B., & Williams, S. (2003). Evaluating the influence of implicit models of mental disorder on processes of shared decision making within community-based multi-disciplinary teams. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1557–1570. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00156-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deady, R. (2012). Studying multidisciplinary teams in the Irish Republic: The conceptual wrangle. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 48, 176–182. 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2011.00326.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (1966). Commission of inquiry on mental illness. Dublin: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (1984). The psychiatric services: Planning for the future. Dublin: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Children. (2006). A Vision for Change. Report of the expert group on mental health policy. Dublin: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Diggins, M. (2004). Teaching and learning communication skills in social work education. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Donnison, J., Thompson, A. R., & Turpin, G. (2009). A qualitative exploration of communication within the community mental health team. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 18, 310–317. 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00620.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grinnell, R., & Unrau, Y. (2011). Social work research and evaluation – Foundations of evidence-based practice ( 9th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 188–196. 10.1080/13561820500081745
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannigan, B., & Allen, D. (2011). Giving a fig about roles: Policy, context and work in community mental health care. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18, 1–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01631.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, S., & Mortimer, R. (1999). Mental health: A contested concept. Journal of Public Mental Health, 1, 4–8. 10.1108/17465729199900002
   Google Scholar
• Karben, K. (2011). Social work and mental health. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, S. (2005). Mental disorders in the social environment. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M., McDaid, D., Mossialos, E., & Thornicroft, G. (2007). Mental health policy and practice across Europe: An overview. In M. Knapp, D. McDaid, E. Mossialos, & G. Thornicroft (Eds.), Mental health policy and practice across Europe: The future direction of mental health care (pp. 1–14). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krysik, J., & Finn, J. (2010). Research for effective social work practice ( 2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mental Health Commission. (2006). Multidisciplinary working: From theory to practice. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mental Health Commission. (2010). Current education/training available for professionals working in mental health services in the republic of Ireland – A scoping study. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, J. (2001). Interprofessional teamworking: What makes teams work well? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15, 29–35. 10.1080/13561820020022855
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Onyett, S. (2003). Teamworking in mental health. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, E., & Norman, I. (1999). Working together in adult community mental health services: Exploring inter-professional role relations. Journal of Mental Health, 8, 231–243. 10.1080/09638239917391
   Google Scholar
• Pecukonis, E., Doyle, O., & Bliss, S. (2008). Reducing barriers to interprofessional training: Promoting interprofessional cultural competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22, 417–428. 10.1080/13561820802190442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D. (2009). Key concepts in mental health ( 2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, K. (2010). The medicalisation thesis. In K. Pollard, J. Thomas, & M. Miers (Eds.), Understanding interprofessional working in health and social care (pp. 121–137). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S., & Zwarenstein, M. (2010). Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care. Chichester: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, A., & Pilgrim, D. (2005). A sociology of mental health and illness ( 3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes, J., & Vaughan, B. (2002). Cross-boundary working: Implications for the multiprofessional team. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11, 399–408. 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00634.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M., Heyman, B., Reynolds, L., Davies, J., & Godin, P. (2007). Multidisciplinary teamwork in a UK regional secure mental health unit a matter for negotiation? Social Theory and Health, 5, 356–377. 10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700103
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenon – logical analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Specht, H. (1985). Managing professional interpersonal interactions. Social Work, 30, 225–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., Schatzman, L., Bucher, R., Ehrlich, D., & Sabshin M. (1981). Psychiatric ideologies and institutions ( 2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E., Arndt, J., Arthur, N., Parboosingh, J., Taylor, E., & Deutschlander, S. (2009). Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 41–51. 10.1080/13561820802338579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar