References

• Babu, K. M., McCurdy, C. R., & Boyer, E. W. (2008). Opioid receptors and legal highs: Salvia divinorum and Kratom. Clinical Toxicology, 46(2), 146–152. doi: 10.1080/15563650701241795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus, K. (2011). Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Multivariate methods of analysis: An application-oriented introduction]. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benbenishty, R. (1992). An overview of methods to elicit and model expert clinical judgment and decision making. Social Service Review, 66(4), 598–616. doi:10.2307/30012489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbenishty, R., Segev, D., Surkis, T., & Elias, T. (2002). Information-search and decision-making by professionals and nonprofessionals in cases of alleged child-abuse and maltreatment. Journal of Social Service Research, 28(3), 1–18. doi: 10.1300/J079v28n03_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 431–452. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00040-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. doi:10.2307/1466699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, J., Buick, D., Hankins, M., Weinman, J., & Horne, R. (2005). The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10(3), 329–358. doi: 10.1348/135910705X25697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dellgran, P., & Höjer, S. (2005). Sources of knowledge and relations between research, education and practice in professional social work. In S.-A. Månsson & C. P. Cervantes (Eds.), Social work in Cuba and Sweden: Achievements and prospects (pp. 75–91). Göteborg: Department of Social Work, Göteborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 177–181. doi: 10.1177/0270467604264992
   Google Scholar
• Drury-Hudson, J. (1999). Decision making in child protection: The use of theoretical, empirical and procedural knowledge by novices and experts and implications for fieldwork placement. British Journal of Social Work, 29(1), 147–169. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. M. (1999). Mindful practice. JAMA, 282(9), 833. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.9.833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, A. K., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feltovich, P. J., & Prietula, M. J., Ericsson K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–67). New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105–114. doi: 10.1177/0038038587021001008
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., … Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 5, 28–45. doi: 10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. (2014). The social care institute for excellence and evidence-based policy and practice. British Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fook, J., Ryan, M., & Hawkins, L. (2000). Professional expertise: practice, theory, and education for working in uncertainty. London: Whiting & Birch.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (1999). Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 80(4), 341–350. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.1214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanem, C., Schwegele, A., Pankofer, S., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2016). Bewährungshilfe und Wissenschaft - eine Annäherung (?) [Probation service and science – A rapprochement (?)]. In S. Borrmann & B. Thiessen (Eds.), Wirkungen Sozialer Arbeit. Potentiale und Grenzen der Evidenzbasierung für Profession und Disziplin [Effects of social work. Potentials and limitations of evidence-based practice for profession and discipline] (pp. 374–394). Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Gira, E. C., Kessler, M. L., & Poertner, J. (2004). Influencing social workers to use research evidence in practice: Lessons from medicine and the allied health professions. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(2), 68–79. doi: 10.1177/1049731503262128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, D. (1996). Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: How valid are the findings? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 5(4), 207–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1996.tb00253.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., Sharland, E., Heinsch, M., & Schubert, L. (2015). Connecting research to action: Perspectives on research utilisation. British Journal of Social Work, 45(7), 1952–1967. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2013). The myth of research-based policy & practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. (1998). Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20(3), 381–400. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2004). The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 11(1), 36–51. doi: 10.1921/17466105.11.1.36
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, P., Csanadi, A., Daxenberger, J., Flekova, L., Ghanem, C., Kollar, I.,  … Gurevych, I. (2016, June). A user interface for the exploration of manually and automatically coded scientific reasoning and argumentation. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. J. (2016). Reconsidering the ‘idea’ of evidence in evidence-based policy and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3–4), 310–335. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1022716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Närhi, K. (2002). Transferable and negotiated knowledge: Constructing social work expertise for the future. Journal of Social Work, 2(3), 317–336. doi: 10.1177/146801730200200304
   Google Scholar
• Okpych, N. J., & Yu, J. L.-H. (2014). A historical analysis of evidence-based practice in social work: The unfinished journey toward an empirically grounded profession. Social Service Review, 88(1), 3–58. doi: 10.1086/674969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petr, C. G., & Walter, U. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: A critical reflection. European Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 221–232. doi: 10.1080/13691450802567523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulter, J. (2003). Research and theory building functions of heuristic case practice. Australian Social Work, 56(4), 318–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0748.2003.00094.x
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., Rossi, J. S., Goldstein, M. G., … Rossi, S. R. (1994). Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology, 13(1), 39–46. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.13.1.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. J. (2001). The role of science in social work: The perennial debate. Journal of Social Work, 1(3), 273–293. doi: 10.1177/146801730100100303
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 115–121. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3102_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. G., Shafer, J. L., & Klein, G. (2006). Professional judgments and ‘naturalistic decision making’. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 403–419). New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Parrish, D. (2007). Views of evidence-based practice among faculty in master of social work programs: A national survey. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(1), 110–122. doi: 10.1177/1049731506293059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., & Rikers, R. M. (2007). How expertise develops in medicine: Knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Medical Education, 41(12), 1133–1139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02915.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Semisch, H. (2010). Doing Addiction. In B. Paul & H. Schmidt-Semisch (Eds.), Risiko Gesundheit [Risk health] (pp. 143–162). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenberg, N. E., & Ravdal, H. (2000). Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinal research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(1), 63–74. doi: 10.1080/136455700294932
   Google Scholar
• Scurlock-Evans, L., & Upton, D. (2015). The role and nature of evidence: A systematic review of social workers’ evidence-based practice orientation, attitudes, and implementation. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 12(4), 369–399. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.853014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2016). Science and social work: A sketch. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3–4), 336–353. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1074552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, M., Newstead, S., Di Caccavo, A., & Ryan, K. (2000). Reflexivity and the development of process knowledge in social work: A classification and empirical study. British Journal of Social Work, 30(4), 465–488. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/30.4.465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerfeld, P. (2014). Social work as an action science: A perspective from Europe. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(5), 586–600. doi: 10.1177/1049731514538523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staempfli, A., Kunz, R., & Tov, E. (2012). Creating a bridge between theory and practice: Working with key situations. European Journal of Social Education, 22/23, 60–78.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Methodological Issues in Researching CSCL, 46(1), 29–48. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurman, Q. C. (1986). Estimating social-psychological effects in decisions to drink and drive: A factorial survey approach. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47(6), 447–454. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1986.47.447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2008). Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: A framework for practice. British Journal of Social Work, 38(6), 1212–1237. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upshur, R. E. G., VanDenKerkhof, E. G., & Goel, V. (2001). Meaning and measurement: An inclusive model of evidence in health care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2), 91–96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00279.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. G. (2013). Perspectives on problem-solving and instruction. Computers & Education, 64, 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, T. (2004). The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative Social Work, 3(1), 78–87. doi: 10.1177/1473325004041133
   Google Scholar