Risk creating and risk reducing: Community perceptions of supervised consumption facilities for illicit drug use

References

• Bayoumi, A., Strike, C., Jairam, J., Watson, T., Enns, E., Kolla, G., et al. (2012). Report of the Toronto and Ottawa Supervised Consumption Assessment Study, 2012. Toronto: St. Michael’s Hospital and the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto. http://www.catie.ca/en/resources/report-toronto-and-ottawa-supervised-consumption-assessment-study-2012
   Google Scholar
• Beekman, D. (2016 4 April). Heroin, cocaine users in Seattle may get country’s first safe-use site. The Seattle Times. Retrieved from: http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/heroin-other-drug-users-may-get-a-safe-use-site-in-seattle/
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S. E., & Bennett, D. (2013). Zoned Out: “NIMBYism,” addiction services and municipal governance in British Columbia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24(6), 61–65. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, N. (2013). Lessons from INSITE, Vancouver’s supervised injection facility: 2003–2012. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 20(3), 234–240. doi:10.3109/09687637.2012.755495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo, M. J., Barrio, G., De La Fuente, L., Royuela, L., Domingo, L., & Silva, T. (2003). Reasons for selecting an initial route of heroin administration and for subsequent transitions during a severe HIV epidemic. Addiction, 98(6), 749–760. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00393.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Press. (2015 September 3). Denis Coderre pledges to open injection sites even without federal approval. CBC News. Retrieved from: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/denis-coderre-pledges-to-open-injection-sites-even-without-federal-approval-1.3214961
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. J., & Howe, M. (2014). Beyond NIMBYism: Understanding community antipathy toward needle distribution services. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(3), 624–632. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(3), 288–300. doi:10.1080/01944369208975808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooling, K., & Rachlis, M. (2010). Vancouver’s supervised injection facility challenges Canada’s drug laws. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182(13), 1440–1444. doi:10.1503/cmaj.100032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, C. (2003). The importance of culture and context: Rethinking risk and risk management in young drug using populations. Health, Risk & Society, 5(3), 285–299. doi:10.1080/13698570310001606987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, A. (2016 April 18). Supervised injection sites represent ‘patient-first’ health care: Levy. The Ottawa Citizen. Retrieved from:http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/supervised-injection-sites-represent-patient-first-health-care-levy
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, B., Turnbull, S., Poland, B., & Haydon, E. (2004). Drug use, risk and urban order: Examining supervised injection sites (SISs) as governmentality. International Journal of Drug Policy, 15(5–6), 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Foderaro, L. (2016 March 22). Ithaca’s anti-heroin plan: Open a site to shoot heroin. The New York Times. Retrieved from:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/23/nyregion/fighting-heroin-ithaca-looks-to-injection-centers.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, K., Jones, C. G. A., Weatherburn, D. J., Rutter, S., Spooner, C. J., & Donnelly, N. (2005). The impact of the Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) on crime. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(2), 173–184. doi:10.1080/09595230500167460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. (2016, 20 March). Edmonton group pushing for city’s first safe injection site. Edmonton Herald. Retrieved from: http://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/edmonton-group-pushing-for-citys-first-safe-injection-site
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, J. (2010, 20 August).RCMP and the truth about safe injection sites [electronic version]. Maclean’s Retrieved from: http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/injecting-truth/.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Mahoney, J., & Woo, A. (2016, 14 March). Toronto to consider three proposed supervised drug-injection sites. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/toronto-health-chief-urges-supervised-drug-injection-sites/article29208244/
   Google Scholar
• Harm Reduction International (2014). The Global State of Harm Reduction 2014 (pp. 1–130). London: Harm Reduction International.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, A. D., & Tousaw, K. I. (2008). Harm reduction headway and continuing resistance: Insights from safe injection in the city of Vancouver. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(1), 11–16. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedrich, D. (2004). European report on drug consumption rooms. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Retrieved from:http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/themes/harm-reduction/consumption-rooms
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, M., Brener, L., Frankland, A., & Treloar, C. (2010). Assessing community support for harm reduction services: Comparing two measures. Drug and Alcohol Review, 29(4), 385–391. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00151.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyshka, E., Bubela, T., & Wild, T. C. (2013). Prospects for scaling-up supervised injection facilities in Canada: The role of evidence in legal and political decision-making. Addiction, 108(3), 468–476. doi:10.1111/add.12064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, T., Kimber, J., DeBeck, K., & Wood, E. (2007). The role of safer injection facilities in the response to HIV/AIDS among injection drug users. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 4(4), 158–164. doi:10.1007/s11904-007-0023-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerr, T., Small, W., Peeace, W., Douglas, D., Pierre, A., & Wood, E. (2006). Harm reduction by a “user-run” organization: A case study of the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU). International Journal of Drug Policy, 17(2), 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber, J., Dolan, K., & Wodak, A. (2005). Survey of drug consumption rooms: Service delivery and perceived public health and amenity impact. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(1), 21–24. doi:10.1080/09595230500125047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondoro, W. (2007). Health Minister Clement promises crackdown on illicit drug use. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 177(6), 559. doi:10.1503/cmaj.071197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxton, R. (2016, 8 February). Could supervised injecting rooms for drug users be the future for Scotland? Evening Times. Retrieved from: http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/14260608.Could_supervised_injecting_rooms_for_drug_users_be_the_future_for_Scotland_/
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, S., & Zimonjic, P. (2016, March 15). Safe injection sites have the potential to save lives, says Jane Philpott. CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/save-injection-sites-toronto-1.3491134
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, K. (2016, 10 February). Lord Mayor: City must ‘embrace’ drug users. Evening Echo. http://www.eveningecho.ie/cork-news/lord-mayor-city-must-embrace-drug-users/1838718/
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, M. (2009, August 13). Safe injection site study stirs concern. The Toronto Star. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2009/08/13/safe_injection_site_study_stirs_concern.html
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, B., & Small, W. (2006). “Speaking truth to power”: The role of drug users in influencing municipal drug policy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17(2), 70–72. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, A. (2008, August 6). Clement’s Insite attack leaves WHO red-faced. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/clements-insite-attack-leaves-who-red-faced/article1058485/.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T. (2002). The “risk environment”: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13(2), 85–94. doi:10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00007-5
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 20(3), 193–201. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T., Kimber, J., Small, W., Fitzgerald, J., Kerr, T., Hickman, M., & Holloway, G. (2006). Public injecting and the need for “safer environment interventions” in the reduction of drug-related harm. Addiction, 101(10), 1384–1393. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01556.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T., Singer, M., Bourgois, P., Friedman, S., & Strathdee, S. (2005). The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Social Science and Medicine, 61(5), 1026–1044. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, A. M., Thein, -H.-H., Kimber, J., Kaldor, J. M., & Maher, L. (2007). Five years on: What are the community perceptions of drug-related public amenity following the establishment of the Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre? The International Journal on Drug Policy, 18(1), 46–53. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schively, C. (2007). Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: Reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research. Journal of Planning Literature, 21(3), 255–266. doi:10.1177/0885412206295845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silversides, A., & Collier, R. (2008). Federal Health Minister assails ethics of Insite. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 179(6), 521. doi:10.1503/cmaj.081317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D., Palepu, A., & Tyndall, M. (2006). The establishment of north america's first state sanctioned supervised injection facility: a case study in culture change. International Journal of Drug Policy,17(2), 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Small, W., Moore, D., Shoveller, J., Wood, E., & Kerr, T. (2012). Perceptions of risk and safety within injection settings: Injection drug users’ reasons for attending a supervised injecting facility in Vancouver, Canada. Health, Risk & Society, 14(4), 307–324. doi:10.1080/13698575.2012.680950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. B. R. (2010). Socio-spatial stigmatization and the contested space of addiction treatment: Remapping strategies of opposition to the disorder of drugs. Social Science and Medicine, 70(6), 859–866. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoltz, J., Wood, E., Small, W., Li, K., Tyndall, M., Montaner, J., & Kerr, T. (2007). Changes in injecting practices associated with the use of a medically supervised safer injection facility. Journal of Public Health, 29(1), 35-39. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdl090
   Google Scholar
• Strike, C., Jairam, J. A., Kolla, G., Millson, P., Shepherd, S., Fischer, B., … Bayoumi, A. M. (2014). Increasing public support for supervised injection facilities in Ontario, Canada. Addiction, 109(6), 946–953. doi:10.1111/add.12506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strike, C., Myers, T., & Millson, M. (2004). Finding a place for needle exchange programs. Critical Public Health, 14(3), 261–275. doi:10.1080/09581590400004386
   Google Scholar
• Strike, C., Rotondi, N. K., Watson, T. M., Kolla, G., & Bayoumi, A. M. (2016). Public opinions about supervised smoking facilities for crack cocaine and other stimulants. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 11(8), 8. doi:10.1186/s13011-016-0052-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strike, C., Watson, T. M., Kolla, G., Penn, R., & Bayoumi, A. M. (2015). Ambivalence about supervised injection facilities among community stakeholders. Harm Reduction Journal, 12(1), 26. doi:10.1186/s12954-015-0060-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, L. M. (1997). The socio-spatial stigmatization of homelessness and HIV/AIDS: Toward an explanation of the NIMBY syndrome. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 45(6), 903–914. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00432-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempalski, B. (2007). Placing the dynamics of syringe exchange programs in the United States. Health & Place, 13(2), 417–431. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thein, H., Kimber, J., Maher, L., MacDonald, M., & Kaldor, J. (2005). Public opinion towards supervised injecting centres and the Sydney medically supervised injecting centre. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(4), 275–280. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, C., & Fraser, S. (2007). Public opinion on needle and syringe programmes: Avoiding assumptions for policy and practice. research-article. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26(4), 355–361. doi:10.1080/09595230701373867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernick, J. S., Burris, S., & Strathdee, S. A. (2003). Public opinion about syringe exchange programmes in the USA: An analysis of national surveys. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14(5–6), 431–435. doi:10.1016/S0955-3959(03)00144-0
   Google Scholar
• Willing, J. (2009, August 14). Interest spikes in drug shooting gallery. Ottawa Sun. Retrieved from http://www.ottawasun.com/news/ottawa/2009/08/13/10456561.html
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, A., & Cooney, A. (2006). Do needle syringe programs reduce HIV Infection among injecting drug users: A comprehensive review of the international evidence. Substance Use and Misuse, 41(6–7), 777–813. doi:10.1080/10826080600669579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Kerr, T., Small, W., Li, K., Marsh, D., Montaner, J., & Tyndall, M. (2004). Changes in public order after the opening of a medically supervised safer injecting facility for illicit injection drug users. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 171(7), 731. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1040774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Tyndall, M. W., Lai, C., Montaner, J. S. G., & Kerr, T. (2006a). Impact of a medically supervised safer injecting facility on drug dealing and other drug-related crime. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 1, 13. doi:10.1186/1747-597X-1-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Tyndall, M. W., Zhang, R., Montaner, J. S. G., & Kerr, T. (2007). Rate of detoxification service use and its impact among a cohort of supervised injecting facility users. Addiction, 102(6), 916–919. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01818.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Tyndall, M. W., Zhang, R., Stoltz, J.-A., Lai, C., Montaner, J. S. G., & Kerr, T. (2006b). Attendance at supervised injecting facilities and use of detoxification services. The New England Journal of Medicine, 354(23), 2512–2514. doi:10.1056/NEJMc052939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. G. (2012). Necessary but insufficient: NIMBY and the development of a therapeutic community for homeless persons with co-morbid disorders. Local Environment, 17(3), 281–293. doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.665856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimonjic, P., & Kupfer, M. (2016, December 12). Liberals to make safe injection sites easier to open and fentanyl harder to smuggle into Canada. CBC News. Retrieved from: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/safe-injection-sites-goodale-philpott-1.3892687
   Google Scholar
• Zurhold, H., Degkwitz, P., Verthein, U., & Haasen, C. (2003). Drug consumption rooms in hamburg, Germany: Evaluation of the effects on harm reduction and the reduction of public nuisance. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(3), 663–688. doi:10.1177/002204260303300308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar