mHealth technologies for pregnancy prevention: A challenge for patient-centred contraceptive counselling in Dutch general practice

References

• Obdeijn L. ‘Hormonentroep’? De ‘pil’ is niet meer vanzelfsprekend. [Hormonal rubbish? The ‘pill’ is no longer a given.] 2021. [Dutch]. [cited 2023 Mar 8]. Available from https://www.parool.nl/nederland/hormonentroep-de-pil-is-niet-meer-vanzelfsprekend∼b38111b5/
   Google Scholar
• Stichting Farmaceutische Kengetallen. Hormonale anticonceptie: gebruik opnieuw lager. [hormonal contraception: usage is decreasing again.]. Pharm Weekbl [Internet]. 2021; [Dutch]. [cited 2023 Mar 8]. Available from: https://www.pw.nl/vaste-rubrieken/sfk/2022/hormonale-anticonceptie-gebruik-opnieuw-lager
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo Urrutia R, Polis CB, Jensen ET, et al. Effectiveness of fertility awareness – based methods for pregnancy prevention a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):1–11. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peragallo Urrutia R, Polis CB. Fertility awareness based methods for pregnancy prevention. Br Med J. 2019;366:l4245.
   Google Scholar
• Pyper C, Knight J. Fertility awareness methods of family planning: the physiological background, methodology and effectiveness of fertility awareness methods. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2001;27(2):103–109. doi:10.1783/147118901101195173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Algera E. Knowing (with) the body: sensory knowing in contraceptive self-tracking. Sociol Health Illn. 2023;45(2):242–258. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehring RJ, Schneider M, Barron ML, et al. Influence of motivation on the efficacy of natural family planning. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2013;38(6):352–358. doi:10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182a1ecc0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer J, Marin V, Lira J. Contraceptive counselling and care: a personalized interactive approach. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(6):418–423. doi:10.1080/13625187.2017.1414793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Fox E, Sobel L, et al. Patient-centered contraceptive counseling: evidence to inform practice. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2016;5(1):55–63. doi:10.1007/s13669-016-0139-1.
   Google Scholar
• Nimbi FM, Rossi R, Tripodi F, et al. A biopsychosocial model for the counseling of hormonal contraceptives: a review of the psychological, relational, sexual, and cultural elements involved in the choice of contraceptive method. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7(4):587–596. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Grumbach K, Schmittdiel JA, et al. Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2017;96(5):380–455. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehlendorf C, Henderson JT, Vittinghoff E, et al. Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):78.e1–78-e9. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badu K, Vijlbrief A, I Van Der V. Motieven en factoren om geen of onregelmatig betrouwbare anticonceptie te gebruiken. [Motives and factors for not using reliable contraception or using contraception irregularly] [Internet]. 2022. [Dutch]. [cited 2023 March 8]. Available from: https://rutgers.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Motieven_voor_niet_of_onregelmatig_-gebruik_-anticonceptie_Samenvatting_November_2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dudouet L. Digitised fertility: the use of fertility awareness apps as a form of contraception in the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2022;5(1):100261. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100261.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffers J. The promise of eHealth for primary care: opportunities for service delivery, patient–doctor communication, self-management, shared decision making and research. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):146–148. doi:10.1080/13814788.2018.1449779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kleij RMJJ, Kasteleyn MJ, Meijer E, et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 1: concepts, conditions and challenges. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25(4):179–189. doi:10.1080/13814788.2019.1658190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap. Anticonceptie | NHG-Richtlijnen. [Dutch College of General Practitioners Guidelines. Contraception | Clinical Guidelines] [Internet]. [Dutch]. 2020. [cited 2023 Nov 9]. Available from: https://richtlijnen.nhg.org/standaarden/anticonceptie#volledige-tekst.
   Google Scholar
• Savage J. Ethnography and health care. BMJ. 2000;321(7273):1400–1402. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger C, Gadinger F. Doing praxiography: research strategies, methods and techniques. In: International practice theory. Cham: palgrave Macmillan; 2018. p. 131–161.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens LM. “We have to be mythbusters”: clinician attitudes about the legitimacy of patient concerns and dissatisfaction with contraception. Soc Sci Med. 2018;212:145–152. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. Clinical Guidelines Fertility Awareness Methods [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/ceuguidancefertilityawarenessmethods/.
   Google Scholar
• Raith-Paula E, Frank-Herrmann P. Natürliche Familienplanung heute: Modernes Zykluswissen für Beratung und Anwendung. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Nappi RE, Vermuyten N, Bannemerschult R. Missed opportunities in contraceptive counselling: findings from a European survey-based study with simulated patient consultation. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022;27(2):85–94. doi:10.1080/13625187.2021.2010040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wale J, Rowlands S. The ethics of state-sponsored and clinical promotion of long-acting reversible contraception. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021;47(3):E11–e11. doi:10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Guen M, Schantz C, Régnier-Loilier A, et al. Reasons for rejecting hormonal contraception in Western countries: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2021;284:114247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandi K, Fuentes L. The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4S):S873–S877. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Littlejohn KE, Kimport K. Contesting and differentially constructing uncertainty: negotiations of contraceptive use in the clinical encounter. J Health Soc Behav. 2017;58(4):442–454. doi:10.1177/0022146517736822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlhausen F, Zinner M, Bieske L, et al. Physicians’ attitudes toward prescribable mHealth apps and implications for adoption in Germany: mixed methods study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(11):e33012. doi:10.2196/33012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bally ELS, Cesuroglu T. Toward integration of mHealth in primary care in The Netherlands: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder perspectives. Front Public Heal. 2020;7:407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar