Series: Public engagement with research. Part 2: GPs and primary care researchers working inclusively with minoritised communities in health research to help address inequalities

References

• Gkiouleka A, Wong G, Sowden S, et al. Reducing health inequalities through general practice. Lancet Public Health. 2023;8(6):1–7. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00093-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvarajah S, Abi Deivanayagam T, Lasco G, et al. Categorisation and minoritisation. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(12):e004508. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornet-van der Aa DA, Altenburg TM, van Randeraad-van der Zee CH, et al. The effectiveness and promising strategies of obesity prevention and treatment programmes among adolescents from disadvantaged backgrounds: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2017;18(5):581–593. doi: 10.1111/obr.12519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunaratnam Y. Researching ‘race’ and ethnicity: methods, knowledge and power. London: SAGE Publications; 2003. pp 3–27. doi: 10.4135/9780857024626.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn S, Clinch M, de Wit M, et al. Series: public engagement with research. Part 1: the fundamentals of public engagement with research. Eur J Gen Pract. 2023;29(1):2232111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow ME, Tweedie K, Pederson A. Heard and valued: the development of a model to meaningfully engage marginalized populations in health services planning. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2969-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156–165. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 5: co-creative qualitative approaches for emerging themes in primary care research: experience-based co-design, user-centred design and community-based participatory research. Eur J Gen Pract. 2022;28(1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.2010700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29(1):325–350. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague L, Afifi R, Ayala G, et al. Participatory praxis as an imperative for health-related stigma research. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1263-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ocloo J, Garfield S, Franklin BD, et al. Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00644-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedhart NS, Pittens CACM, Tončinić S, et al. Engaging citizens living in vulnerable circumstances in research: a narrative review using a systematic search. Res Involv Engagem. 2021;7(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00306-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown G, Marshall M, Bower P, et al. Barriers to recruiting ethnic minorities to mental health research: a systematic review. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014;23(1):36–48. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell CA, Higgins M, Chauhan R, et al. They think we’re ok and we know we’re not. a qualitative study of asylum seekers’ access, knowledge and views to health care in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1). doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, et al. Community-based participatory research conceptual model: community partner consultation and face validity. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(1):117–135. doi: 10.1177/1049732314557084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal J. Whose responsibility is it to dismantle medical mistrust? Future directions for researchers and health care providers. Behav Med. 2019;45(2):188–196. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1630357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain-Gambles M, Atkin K, Leese B. South Asian participation in clinical trials: the views of lay people and health professionals. Health Policy. 2006;77(2):149–165. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard KC, Evans D. Theorising service user involvement from a researcher perspective. Mental health service users in research. Bristol: Policy Press; 2013. p. 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ajayi O. A perspective on health inequalities in BAME communities and how to improve access to primary care. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(1):36–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Reilly-de Brún M, de Brún T, Okonkwo E, et al. Using participatory learning & action research to access and engage with ‘hard to reach’ migrants in primary healthcare research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1247-8.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis E, Jones R, Tipene-Leach D, et al. Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: a literature review and recommended definition. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1082-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam J, Aldridge R, Blackburn R, et al. How is ethnicity reported, described, and analysed in health research in the UK? A bibliographical review and focus group discussions with young refugees. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16947-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes L, Cresswell K, Williams S, et al. Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0160-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Research. Programme development grants – developing innovative, inclusive and diverse public partnerships call brief 2023; [cited 2023 Nov 29]. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/programme-development-grants-developing-innovative-inclusive-and-diverse-public-partnerships-call-brief/29676.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Research. Supporting equity and tackling inequality: how can NIHR promote inclusion in public partnerships 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=supporting-equity-and-tackling-inequality-how-can-nihr-promote-inclusion-in-public-partnerships.
   Google Scholar
• Gilfoyle M, MacFarlane A, Salsberg J. Conceptualising, operationalising, and measuring trust in participatory health research networks: a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2022;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01910-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parveen S, Barker S, Kaur R, et al. Involving minority ethnic communities and diverse experts by experience in dementia research: the caregiving HOPE study. Dementia (London). 2018;17(8):990–1000. doi: 10.1177/1471301218789558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salsberg J, Macridis S, Garcia Bengoechea E, et al. Engagement strategies that foster community self-determination in participatory research: insider ownership through outsider championship. Fam Pract. 2017;34(3):336–340. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lems E, Hilverda F, Sarti A, et al. ‘McDonald’s is good for My social life’. Developing health promotion together with adolescent girls from disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Amsterdam. Child Soc. 2020;34(3):204–219. doi: 10.1111/chso.12368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam S, Joseph O, Chaudry A, et al. “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach. Res Involv Engage. 2021;7(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar