Medical video abstracts and their subgenres: a phase-based approach to the detection of generic structure patterns

References

• American Academy of Pediatrics. 2020. “Video Abstracts Guidelines.” Accessed August 22, 2020. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/video-abstract-guidelines/
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, Anthony. 2004. “Phase and Transition, Type and Instance: Patterns in Media Texts as Seen through a Multimodal Concordancer.” In Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives, edited by Kay O’Halloran, 83–108. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, Anthony, and Paul J. Thibault. 2006. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. A Multimedia Toolkit with Associated On-line Course. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, Anthony, Paul J. Thibault, Francesca Coccetta, Deirdre Kantz, and Davide Taibi. 2020. “Multimodal Ecological Literacy: Animal and Human Interactions in the Animal Rescue Genre.” In Multiliteracy Advances and Multimodal Challenges in ELT Environments, edited by Nicoletta Vasta and Anthony Baldry, 155–218. Udine: Forum Editrice.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, Jacob. 2013. “Video Abstracts, the Latest Trend in Scientific Publishing. Will ‘Publish or Perish’ Soon Include ‘Video or Vanish’?” University Affairs, February 6. https://www.universityaffairs.ca/features/feature-article/video-abstracts-the-latest-trend-in-scientific-publishing/
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, Jay, and Richard Grusin. 1999. Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, Marina. 2018. “Try to Prove Me Wrong: Dialogicity and Audience Involvement in Economics Blogs.” Discourse, Context & Media 24: 33–42. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, Paul. 1994. “A Genre Analysis of the Results Section of Sociology Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, Esther, Megan Ranney, Teresa Chan, Seth Trueger, Amy Walsh, Ken Tegtmeyer, Shannon McNamara, Ricky Choi, and Christopher Carroll. 2015. “Twitter as A Tool for Communication and Knowledge Exchange in Academic Medicine: A Guide for Skeptics and Novices.” Medical Teacher 37 (5): 411–416. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.993371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccetta, Francesca. 2020a. “A Corpus-based Approach to the Analysis of the Video Abstract Genre: A Phase-based Model.” Lingue e Linguaggi 40: 45–65. doi:10.1285/i22390359v40p45.
   Google Scholar
• Coccetta, Francesca. 2020b. “Medical Video Abstracts: A Web Genre for Research Accessibility and Visibility.” In Scholarly Pathways: Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Exchange in Academia, edited by Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maci, and Michele Sala, 305–327. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• English, Fiona. 2011. Student Writing and Genre. Reconfiguring Academic Knowledge. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Fauville, Geraldine, Sam Dupont, Susan von Thun, and Johan Lundin. 2015. “Can Facebook Be Used to Increase Scientific Literacy? A Case Study of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Facebook Page and Ocean Literacy.” Computers & Education 82: 60–73. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, Michael. 1995. “Generic Expectancies and Discoursal Surprises: John Donne’s the Good Morrow.” In Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday, edited by Peter Fries and Michael Gregory, 67–84. Norwood: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, Michael. 2002. “Phasal Analysis within Communication Linguistics: Two Contrastive Discourses.” In Relations and Functions in Language and Discourse, edited by Peter Fries, Michael Cummings, David Lockwood, and William Sprueill, 316–345. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1978. “Text in the Systemic Functional Model.” In Current Trends in Text Linguistics, edited by Wolfgang U. Dressier, 228–246. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1984. “The Nursery Tale as a Genre.” Nottingham Linguistic Circular 13: 71–102.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective, Part B. Geelong. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2004. “Analysing Discursive Variation.” In Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Studies in Social Change, edited by Lynne Young and Claire Harrison, 15–52. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, Susan. 2013. “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent.” In Discourse 2.0. Language and New Media, edited by Deborah Tannen and Anna Marie Trester, 1–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IOPscience. 2020. “Tips on Making a Good Video Abstract.” Accessed November 28, 2020. https://publishingsupport.iopscience.iop.org/questions/tips-on-making-a-good-video-abstract/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, David. 2017. “Video Abstracts Now Available.” American Journal of Physics 85 (2): 85–86. doi:10.1119/1.4973116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2007. “Rhetorical Moves in Biochemistry Research Articles.” In Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure, edited by Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor, and Thomas Upton, 73–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kobré, Kenneth. 2012. Videojournalism. Multimedia Storytelling. Burlington: Focal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle, John. 2009. “Introduction to Video Abstracts.” Accessed November 23, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Paa_uU51un8
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay. 1998. “Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiosis in Scientific Text.” In Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, edited by Jim Martin and Robert Veel, 87–111. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Jianxin. 2020. “Research Video Abstracts in the Making: A Revised Move Analysis.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 50 (4): 423–446. doi:10.1177/0047281619894981.
   Google Scholar
• Luzón, Maria José. 2017. “Connecting Genres and Languages in Online Scholarly Communication: An Analysis of Research Group Blogs.” Written Communication 34 (4): 1–31. doi:10.1177/0741088317726298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm, Karen. 2010. Phasal Analysis. Analysing Discourse through Communication Linguistics. London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mauranen, Anna. 2013. “Hybridism, Edutainment, and Doubt: Science Blogging Finding Its Feet.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 12 (1): 7–36. doi:10.35360/njes.274.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, Jaqueline, and Debra Brandon. 2016. “Video Abstracts. A Fun, Easy Way to Capture Your Audience: Try It!” Advances in Neonatal Care 16 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1097/ANC.0000000000000271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwogu, Kevin Ngozi. 1997. “The Medical Research Paper: Structure and Functions.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 119–138. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, Matthew. 2002. “Communicative Moves in the Discussion Section of Research Articles.” System 30 (4): 479–497. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, Matthew. 2011. “The Structure of Methods Sections in Research Articles across Eight Disciplines.” Asian ESP Journal 7: 99–124.
   Google Scholar
• Plastina, Anna Franca. 2017. “Professional Discourse in Video Abstracts: Re-articulating the Meaning of Written Research Article Abstracts.” In Specialized and Professional Discourse across Media and Genres, edited by Giuliana Garzone, Paola Catenaccio, Kim Grego, and Roxanne Doerr, 57–73. Milano: Ledizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth, and Shirley Carter-Thomas. 2005. “The Rhetoric of Conference Presentation Introductions: Context, Argument and Interaction.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 45–70. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00080.x.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, Scott. 2014. “Exploring Video Abstracts in Science Journals: An Overview and Case Study.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2 (2). doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1110.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, Gerard. 1999. “Genres of Discourse and the Definition of Literature.” Discourse Processes 28 (2): 109–120. doi:10.1080/01638539909545075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, John. 2004. Research Genres. Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thibault, Paul J. 2000. “The Multimodal Transcription of a Television Advertisement: Theory and Practice.” In Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age, edited by Anthony Baldry, 311–385. Campobasso: Palladino Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Whitesides, George. 2011. “Impact of Video on Scientific Articles.” Accessed November 2, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HboNzrq0MKE
   Google Scholar
• Wiley. 2020. “Video Promotion.” Accessed November 2, 2020. https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/Promotion/video-abstracts.html
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Wenhsien. 2016. “Evaluative Language and Interactive Discourse in Journal Article Highlights.” English for Specific Purposes 42: 89–103. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar