A comparison of different methods to measure the EGG contact quotient

References

• Fabre P. Une perocédé électrique d'inscription de l'accolement glottique au course de la phonation: Glottographie de haute fréquence. Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médicine. 1957; 141: 66–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baken, RJ, Orlikoff, RF. Correlates of Vocal Fold Motion: Electroglottography. Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice, 2nd ed. Singular/Thompson Learning; San Diego, 2000. p. 413–27.
   Google Scholar
• Baken RJ. Electroglottography. J Voice. 1992; 6(2)98–110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzing P. Clinical Applications of Electroglottography. J Voice. 1990; 4(3)238–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton RH, Conture EG. Problems and Pitfalls in Electroglottography. J Voice. 1990; 4(1)10–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer T, Löfqvist A, McGarr NS. Laryngeal vibrations: A comparison between high-speed filming and glottographic techniques. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 73(4)1304–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers DG, Naik JM, Larar JN, Krishnamurthy AK, Moore GP. Electroglottography, speech, and ultra-high speed cinematography. Vocal Fold Physiology and Biophysics of Voice, IR Titze, R Scherer. Denver Center of Performing Arts, Denver 1983; 202–20
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, M. Some relations between glottal air flow and vocal fold contact area, American Speech and Hearing Association; Rockville/Maryland, 1981 p. 88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Garner PE, Howard DM. Real-time display of voice source characteristics. Log Phon Vocol. 1999; 24: 19–25
   Google Scholar
• Batty SV, Howard DM, Garner PE, Turner P, White AD. Clinical pilot study assessment of a portable real-time voice analyser. Log Phon Vocol. 2002; 27: 59–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VoceVista [computer program]. 2004. Available from: URL:, , http://www.vocevista.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg M, Mahshie JJ. Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area. J Speech Hear Res. 1988; 31: 338–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nair, G. Voice-Tradition and Technology. A State-of-the-Art Studio. San DiegoCalifornia: Singular Publishing Gorup, Inc.; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Verdolini K, Chan R, Hess M, Bierhals W. Correspondence of electroglottographic closed quotient to vocal fold impact stress in excised canine larynges. J Voice. 1998; 12(4)415–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard DM. Variation of Electrolaryngographically Derived Closed Quotient for Trained and Untrained Adult Female Singers. J Voice. 1995; 9(2)163–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacki T. Electroglottographic Quasi-Open Quotient and Amplitude in Crescendo Phonation. J Voice. 1996; 10(4)342–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich N, d'Alessandro C, Doval B, Castellengo M. On the use of the derivative of electroglottographic signals for characterization of nonpathological phonation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 115(3)1321–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers DG, Hicks DM, Moore GP, Alsaka YA. A model for vocal fold vibratory motion, contact area, and the electroglottogram. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986; 80(5)1309–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard DM, Lindsey GA, Allen B. Toward the Quantification of Vocal Efficiency. J Voice. 1990; 4(3)205–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg J, Högset C. Voice source differences between falsetto and modal registers in counter tenors, tenors and baritones. Log Phon Vocol. 2001; 26: 26–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schutte, HK, Miller, DG. Measurement of closed quotient in a female singing voice by electroglottography and videokymography. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Advances in Quantitative Laryngology, Groningen Voice Research Lab, University of GroningenGroningen, The Netherlands2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg M. A Multichannel Electroglottograph. J Voice. 1992; 6(1)36–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proceedings of the institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 1993 p. 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, C. An Algorithm to Calculate the EGG Closed Quotient. 2005, Available from: URL:, http://www.humandegg.org/cq_algo.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hess M, Ludwigs M. Strobophotoglottographic Transillumination as a Method for the Analysis of Vocal Fold Vibration Patterns. J Voice. 2000; 14(2)255–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D, Schutte, HK, Hess, M. Glottal opening determined in simultaneous electroglottograph and microphone signals. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Advances in Quantitative Laryngology, Groningen Voice Research Lab, University of GroningenGroningen, The Netherlands2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sapienza CM, Stathopoulos ET, Dromey C. Approximations of Open Quotient and Speed Quotient from Glottal Airflow and EGG Waveforms: Effects of Measurement Criteria and Sound Pressure Level. J Voice. 1998; 12(1)31–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikoff RF. Assessment of the Dynamics of Vocal Fold Contact From the Electroglottogram: Data From Normal Male Subjects. J Voice. 1991; 34: 1066–72
   Google Scholar