An acoustic and auditory analysis of vocants in infants with cochlear implants

References

• Oller DK, Eilers R, Neal A, et al. Precursors to speech in infancy: the prediction of speech and language disorders. J Commun Disord. 1999;32(4):223–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R. Anatomical and neuromuscular maturation of the speech mechanism: evidence from acoustic studies. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1976;19(3):421–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R, Forner L. Speech segment durations in sentence recitations by children and adults. J Phon. 1980;8(2):157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald A. Hearing, listening, and understanding: auditory development in infancy. In: Blackwell handbook of infant development. London: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 35–70.
   Google Scholar
• Katz G, Cohn J, Moore C. A combination of vocal f0 dynamic and summary features discriminates be- tween three pragmatic categories of infant-directed speech. Child Dev. 1996;67:205–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura C, Lam C. Age-specific preferences for infant-directed affective intent. Infancy. 2009;14(1):77–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setter J, Stojanovik V, Vana Ewijk L, et al. Pitch range and vowel duration in the speech of the children with Williams Syndrome. Proceedings of the ICPhS XVI; 2007; Saarbrucken; p. 1977–1979.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich M, Weber C, Friederici AD. Electrophysiological evidence for delayed mismatch response in infants at-risk for specific language impairment. Psychophysiology. 2004;41(5):772–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blech A, Springer L, Kroger B. Perceptual and acoustic analysis of vowel productions in words and pseudo words in children with suspected childhood apraxia of speech. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Science; 2007. Saarbrücken, Germany; p. 2013–2016.
   Google Scholar
• Robb M, Bleile K, Yee S. A phonetic analysis of vowel errors during the course of treatment. Clin Linguist Phon. 1999;13:309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen R. Durational aspects of vowel production in the speech of deaf children. J Speech Hear Res. 1974;17(3):386–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neumeyer V, Harrington J, Draxler C. An acoustic analysis of the vowel space in young and old cochlear-implant speakers. Clin Linguist Phon. 2010;24(9):734–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan M. Mean Length of Utterance before words and grammar: longitudinal trends and developmental implications of infant vocalizations. J Child Lang. 2009;36(3):495–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchner L, Brehm S, Weinrich B. Pediatric voice: a modern. Collaborative Approach to Care. San Diego (CA): Plural Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell P, Kent R. Phonetic variation in multisyllable babbling. J Child Lang. 1990;17(2):247–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon C, Otomo K. Babbling development of hearing-impaired and normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Disord. 1986;51(1):33–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papousek M. Vom ersten Schrei zum ersten Wort. In: Anfänge der Sprachentwicklung in der vorsprachlichen Kommunikation. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Oller DK. The emergence of the speech capacity. 1st ed. Mahwah (NJ): Psychology Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kern S, Gayraud F, Marsico E. Emergence of linguistic abilities. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer S, Fais L, Golinkoff R, et al. Perceptual narrowing of linguistic sign occurs in the 1st year of life. Child Dev. 2012;83(2):543–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael L, Borden G, Harris K. Speech science primer. 6th ed. Baltimore (US): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Svirsky MA, Fitzgerald MB, Neuman A, et al. Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(6):422–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavatzanidis NK, Murbe D, Friederici AD, et al. The perception of stress pattern in young cochlear implanted children: an EEG study. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavatzanidis NK, Murbe D, Friederici AD, et al. The basis for language acquisition: congenitally deaf infants discriminate vowel length in the first months after cochlear implantation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015;27:2424–2441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumeyer V, Harrington J, Draxler C. An acoustic analysis of the vowel space in young and old cochlear-implant speakers. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011;25:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane H, Wozniak J, Matthies M, et al. Phonemic resetting versus postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: an exploration of voice‐onset time. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;98(6):3096–3106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead R, Jones K. Influence of consonant environment on duration of vowels produced by normal‐hearing, hearing‐impaired, and deaf adult speakers. J Acoust Soc Am. 1976;60(2):513–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchanski R, Geers A. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear Hear. 2003;24:90S–105S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A, Geers A, Moog J. Practical implications of cochlear implant in children. Ear Hear. 1991;12:81S–89S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl H, Wake M, Sarant J, et al. Language and speech perception outcomes in hearing-impaired children with and without connexin 26 mutations. Audiol Neurootol. 2003;8(5):263–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers AE. Performance aspects of mainstreaming. In: Ross M, editor. Hearing impaired children in the mainstream. Parkton (MD): York Press; 1990. p. 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes H, Treiman R, Geers A. Spelling in deaf children with cochlear implants. In: Arfe B, Dockrell V, Berninger V, editors. Writing development in children with hearing loss, dyslexia, or oral language problems: implications for assessment and instruction. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas J, Geers A. Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe-profound hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50(4):1048–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky M, Teoh S, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Hum Hered. 2004;9(4):224–233.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R, Preece J, Wilson B, et al. Distance, localization and speech perception pilot studies with bilateral cochlear implants. Cochlear implants—an update. In: Kudo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T, editors. Cochlear implantation update. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2002. p. 517–521.
   Google Scholar
• Connor C, Hieber S, Arts H, et al. The education of children with cochlear implants: total or oral communication? J Speech Lang Hear Res . 2000;43(5):1185–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers AE. Factors affecting the development of speech, language, and literacy in children with cochlear implants. Lshss. 2002;33(3):172–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky M. Language development in children with profound and prelingual hearing loss, without cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2001;36:99–100.
   Google Scholar
• Connor C, Zwolan T. Examining multiple sources of influence on the reading comprehension skills of children who use cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res . 2004;47(3):509–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer LJ, Tomblin J, Gantz J. Reading skills in children with multichannel cochlear implant experience. Volta Rev. 1997;99(4):193–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederberg A, Spencer P. Critical periods in the acquisition of lexical skills: evidence from deaf individuals. In: Fletcher P, Miller J, editors. Language Disorders and Developmental Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2005. p. 121–145.
   Google Scholar
• Tomblin B, Barker B, Spencer L, et al. The effect of age at cochlear implant initial stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48(4):853–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky M, Chin S, Jester A. The effects of age at implantation on speech intelligibility in pediatric cochlear implant users: clinical outcomes and sensitive periods. Audio. 2007;5(4):293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Dettman S, Pinder D, Briggs R, et al. Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear Hear. 2007;28(Supplement):11S–18S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis H, Koch M, Wyatt J, et al. Trends in educational placement and cost-benefit considerations in children with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(5):499–505.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geers AE, Brenner C. Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age. Ear Hear. 2003;24(Supplement):2S–14S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor C, Craig H, Raudenbush S, et al. The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation? Ear Hear. 2006;27(6):628–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer P. Individual differences in language performance after cochlear implantation at one to three years of age: child, family, and linguistic factors. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004;9(4):395–412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VanDam M, Ide-Helvie D, Moeller MP. Point vowel duration in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants at four and five years of age. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011;25(8):689–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R, Miolo G, Bloedel S. Measuring and assessing the intelligibility of children’s speech. Meas. Assess. intelligibility Child. speech, San Antonio: Mini seminar presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Brown E, Fox R, et al. Acoustic properties of vowel production in prelingually deafened Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;138(5):2791–2799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith B. Temporal aspects of English speech production: a developmental perspective. J Phon. 1978;6(1):37–67.
   Google Scholar
• Flege J. Laryngeal timing and phonation onset in utterance-initial English stops. J Phon. 1982;10(2):177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni D, Geers A. Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;185:92–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfqvist A, Sahlén B, Ibertsson T. Vowel spaces in Swedish adolescents with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;128(5):3064–3069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J, Brown J. Effects of utterance position on English speech timing. Phonetica. 1982;39(6):337–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudonck N, D'haeseleer E, Dhooge I, et al. Objective vocal quality in children using cochlear implants: a multiparameter approach. J Voice. 2011;25(6):683–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis K, Sfakiannaki A. An acoustic analysis of vowels produced by Greek speakers with hearing impairment. Proceedings of the ICPhS XVI; 2007; Saarbrücken; p. 1969–1972.
   Google Scholar
• Harold M, Barlow S. Effects of environmental stimulation on infant vocalizations and orofacial dynamics at the onset of canonical babbling. Infant Behav Dev. 2013;36(1):84–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harold M. Canonical babbling and very-early intervention. Seattle (WA): CreateSpace; 2013.
   Google Scholar