Persisting speech difficulties at 7–8 years of age – a longitudinal study of speech production in internationally adopted children with cleft lip and palate

References

• Lee A, Gibbon FE, Spivey K. Children's attitudes toward peers with unintelligible speech associated with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(3):262–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson A, Miniscalco C, Mark H, et al. Internationally adopted children with unilateral cleft lip and palate-consonant proficiency and perceived velopharyngeal competence at the age of 5. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(7):849–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson A, Schölin J, Mark H, et al. Speech production in 3-year-old internationally adopted children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017;52(5):626–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan A, O'Gara M, Bellucci CC, et al. Speech production skills in children with cleft palate who were internationally adopted. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(9):1225–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlsten Schölin J, Jonasson A, Axelsson J, et al. Surgical, speech, and hearing outcomes at five years of age in internationally adopted children and Swedish-born children with cleft lip and/or palate. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020;54(1):6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer N, Baker S, Kaiser A, et al. Longitudinal comparison of the speech and language performance of United States-born and internationally adopted toddlers with cleft lip and palate: a pilot study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(7):941–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer AW. Evaluation of speech and resonance for children with craniofacial anomalies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2016;24(4):445–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneel L, Bettens K, Van Lierde K. The relationship between health-related quality of life and speech in patients with cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;120:112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding A, Grunwell P. Characteristics of cleft palate speech. Eur J Disord Commun. 1996;31(4):331–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bettens K, Alighieri C, Bruneel L, et al. Peer attitudes toward children with cleft (lip and) palate related to speech intelligibility, hypernasality and articulation. J Commun Disord. 2020;85:105991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg J, Hagberg E, Havstam C. "She sounds like a small child or perhaps she has problems"-peers' descriptions of speech in 7-year-olds born with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(6):707–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson JW, Smartt J, Saltzman BS, et al. Adopted children with cleft lip and/or palate: a unique and growing population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(2):283e–293E.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan SR, Jung YS, Mulliken JB. Outcomes of cleft palatal repair for internationally adopted children. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1445–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allori AC, Kelley T, Meara JG, et al. A standard setof outcome measures for the comprehensive appraisal of cleft care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(5):540–554.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Lundeborg I, Persson C. SVANTE – The Swedish Articulation and Nasality Test – Normativedata and a minimum standard set for cross-linguistic comparison. Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(2):137–154.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan AR, Bellucci CC, Coppersmith J, et al. Language development in children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip adopted from non-English-speaking countries. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(2):342–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson A, Persson C, Klinto K, et al. Internationally adopted children with and without a cleft lip and palate showed no differences in language ability at school-age. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(1):273–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman P. Global Statistics for Intercountry Adoption: Receiving States and States of origin 2000. 2019 2021 [cited 2021 Sept 16]. Available from: https://assets.hcch.net/docs/a8fe9f19-23e6-40c2-855e-388e112bf1f5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Friede H, Lilja J, Lohmander A. Two-stage palatal surgery with early veloplasty and delayed hard palate repair: a balanced view on speech and midfacial growth outcome. In Berkowitz S, editor. Cleft lip and palate: diagnosis and management. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2013. p. 413–437.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int. 2001;5:341–345.
   Google Scholar
• IPA. IPA Chart; 2018. [cited 2021 Aug 12]. Available from: https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/ipa-chart.
   Google Scholar
• ICPLA ICPaLA. Extensions to the International Phonetic Alphabet (extIPA), symbols for disordered speech; 2015. [cited 2021 Aug 12]. Available from: https://www.icpla.info/extIPAChart2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg LD, Kwiatkowski J. Phonological disorders iii: a procedure for assessing severity of involvement. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982;47(3):256–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohmander A, Hagberg E, Persson C, et al. Validity of auditory perceptual assessment of velopharyngeal function and dysfunction – the VPC-Sum and the VPC-Rate. Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(7–9):589–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willadsen E, Lohmander A, Persson C, et al. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 5. Speech outcomes in 5-year-olds – consonant proficiency and errors. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(1):38–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd B. Differential diagnosis of pediatric speech sound disorder. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2014;1(3):189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Sell D, Sweeney T. Percent consonant correct as an outcome measure for cleft speech in an intervention study. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(2):143–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lundeborg Hammarström I. LINUS 2.0: LINköpingsUnderSökningen 2.0- Ett fonologiskt bedömningsmaterial för barn från 3 år. Linköpings Universitet; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmander A, Friede H, Elander A, et al. Speech development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different delays in closure of the hard palate after early velar repair: a longitudinal perspective. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40(5):267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd B, Holm A, Hua Z, et al. Phonological development: a normative study of British English-Speaking children. Clin Linguist Phon. 2003;17(8):617–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod S, Crowe K. Children's consonant acquisition in 27 languages: a cross-linguistic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(4):1546–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi J, Broersma M, Cutler A. Early phonology revealed by international adoptees' birth language retention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(28):7307–7312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennen S. A longitudinal study of language and speech in children who were internationally adopted at different ages. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2014;45(3):185–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman KL, Willadsen E. The development of speech in children with cleft palate. In Howard S, Lohmander A, editors. Cleft palate speech: assessment and intervention. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Werker CL, de Wilde H, Mink van Der Molen AB, et al. Internationally adopted children with cleft lip and/or palate: a retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(12):1732–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar