528
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

"Aha, so that’s how it’s done!" – parents’ voices on an early language and literacy intervention

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 30 Sep 2022, Accepted 08 Jan 2024, Published online: 06 Mar 2024

References

  • Shahaeian A, Wang C, Tucker-Drob E, et al. Early shared reading, socioeconomic status, and children’s cognitive and school competencies: six years of longitudinal evidence. Sci Stud Read. 2018;22(6):485–502. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1482901.
  • Gilkerson J, Richards JA, Warren SF, et al. Language experience in the second year of life and language outcomes in late childhood. Pediatrics. 2018;142(4):e20174276. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-4276.
  • Franco F, Suttora C, Spinelli M, et al. Singing to infants matters: early singing interactions affect musical preferences and facilitate vocabulary building. J Child Lang. 2022;49(3):552–577. doi: 10.1017/s0305000921000167.
  • Raikes H, Alexander Pan B, Luze G, et al. Mother-child bookreading in low-income families: correlates and outcomes during the first three years of life. Child Dev. 2006;77(4):924–953. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00911.x.
  • Flack ZM, Field AP, Horst JS. The effects of shared storybook reading on word learning: a meta-analysis. Dev Psychol. 2018;54(7):1334–1346. doi: 10.1037/dev0000512.
  • O’Farrelly C, Doyle O, Victory G, et al. Shared reading in infancy and later development: evidence from an early intervention. Journal Appl Dev Psychol. 2018;54:69–83. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2017.12.001.
  • Yogman M, Garner A, Hutchinson J, et al. The power of play: a pediatric role in enhancing development in young children. Pediatrics. 2018;142(3):e20182058. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2058.
  • Walker SP, Chang SM, Vera-Hernández M, et al. Early childhood stimulation benefits adult competence and reduces violent behavior. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):849–857. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2231.
  • Debaryshe BD, Binder JC. Development of an instrument for measuring parental beliefs about reading aloud to young children. Percept Mot Skills. 1994;78(3_suppl):1303–1311. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.78.3c.1303.
  • Iflazoglu A, Feyza N, Deretarla E. Investigation of parents’ early literacy beliefs in the context of Turkey through the parent reading belief inventory (PRBI). European J ED Res. 2018;7(4):985–997. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.985.
  • Clark C, Hawkins L. Young people’s reading: the importance of the home environment and family support: more findings from our national survey. London: National Literacy Trust; 2010.
  • Hartas D. Inequality and the home learning environment: predictions about seven-year-olds’ language and literacy. British Educational Res J. 2012;38(5):859–879. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2011.588315.
  • Van Bergen E, Van Zuijen T, Bishop D, et al. Why are home literacy environment and children’s reading skills associated? What parental skills reveal. Read Res Q. 2017;52(2):147–160. doi: 10.1002/rrq.160.
  • Adenfelt M, Segerström A, Strandberg R. Bokstart i världen: metoder och forskning om bokgåvoprogram för små barn och deras familjer. [Bookstart worldwide: methods and research on book-gifting programs for young children and their families.] Stockholm: Statens Kulturråd; 2020. Swedish.
  • Egan SM, Hoyne C, Moloney M. Shared book reading with infants: a review of international and national baby book gifting schemes. J Early Child Studies. 2020;13(1):49–64.
  • European Commission. Eu high level group of experts on literacy: final report. Luxembourg: European Union; 2012. doi: 10.2766/34382.
  • De Bondt M, Willenberg IA, Bus AG. Do book giveaway programs promote the home literacy environment and children’s literacy-related behavior and skills? Rev Educ Res. 2020;90(3):349–375. doi: 10.3102/0034654320922140.
  • Dowdall N, Melendez-Torres GJ, Murray L, et al. Shared picture book reading interventions for child language development: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Dev. 2020;91(2):e383–e399. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13225.
  • O’Hare L, Connolly P. A cluster randomised controlled trial of “bookstart”: a book gifting programme. J Child Serv. 2014;9(1):18–30. doi: 10.1108/JCS-05-2013-0021.
  • Wade B, Moore M. A sure start with books. Early Years. 2000;20(2):39–46. doi: 10.1080/0957514000200205.
  • Zuckerman B, Khandekar A. Reach out and read: evidence based approach to promoting early child development. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010; 22(4):539–544. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833a4673.
  • Goldfeld S, Quach J, Nicholls R, et al. Four-year-old outcomes of a universal Infant-Toddler shared reading intervention: the let’s read trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(11):1045–1052. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1099.
  • Yeager Pelatti C, Pentimonti JM, Justice LM. Methodological review of the quality of reach out and read. Clin Pediatr . 2014;53(4):343–350. doi: 10.1177/0009922813507995.
  • Cologon K, Mevawalla Z. Increasing inclusion in early childhood: key word sign as a communication partner intervention. Int J Incl Educ. 2018;22(8):902–920. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1412515.
  • Språkstart Halland – små barns språkutveckling. [Internet] Region Halland: Region Halland; 2023 [cited 2023 Sept 22]. Available from: https://www.regionhalland.se/kultur/kulturbarnunga/sprakstart/.
  • Lundqvist J, Almqvist Tangen J. En utvärdering av Språkstart Halland - hur en regional och kommunal insats med inslag av gemensam bokläsning kan främja förskolebarns språkutveckling [An evaluation of Språkstart Halland - how a regional and municipal initiative involving shared reading can promote language development in preschool children] [Masters’ thesis]. Lund: Lund University; 2020. Swedish.
  • Booktrust. Bookstart national impact evaluation. Leeds: Booktrust;2009.
  • MacPherson I, McKie L. Qualitative research in programme evaluation. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, De Vries R, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research; 2010. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. p. 454–477.
  • Barbour RS. Focus groups. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, Vries RD, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2010. p. 327–352.
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
  • Hellingwerf K, Facht U. Textmedier. In: Ohlsson J, editor. The Media Barometer 2020. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Nordicom - Nordic Information Centre for Media and Communication Research; 2021. p.76–79. doi: 10.48335/9789188855497.
  • QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo (released in march 2020). Alfasoft; 2020. Available from: https://alfasoft.com/sv/programvara/statistik-och-dataanalys/qda-kvalitativ-dataanalys/nvivo/.
  • Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002.
  • Lindgren B-M, Lundman B, Graneheim UH. Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;108:103632. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632.
  • Bookstart. (2010). 2009/10 ‘A Social Return on Investment (SROI) Analysis’: prepared for Book- trust by Just Economics LLP. Leeds, England: Booktrust.
  • Bleses D, Andersen MK. Kan bogstart gøre en forskel? En undersøgelse af bogstarts potentiale som led i det forebyggende arbejde for at understøtte sprogtilegnelsen hos børn i udsatte boligområder. [Can bookstart make a difference? An investigation into the potential of bookstart as part of preventive efforts to support language acquisition in children in disadvantaged residential areas]. Odense: Center for Børnesprog, Syddansk Universitet; 2011. Danish.
  • Mezirow J. Transformative learning as discourse. J Transform Educ. 2003;1(1):58–63. doi: 10.1177/1541344603252172.
  • Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. Three principles to improve outcomes for children and families: 2021 update. Cambridge (MA): Harward University; 2021.
  • Espersen HH. Evaluering af samarbejdet i projekt bogstart. En opsøgende biblioteksindsats over for familier med førskolebørn i udsatte boligområder [Evaluation of the collaboration in project bookstart. An outreach library initiative for families with preschool children in disadvantaged housing areas]. Copenhagen: KORA: Det Nationale Institut for Kommuners og Regioners Analyse og Forskning; 2016. Danish.
  • National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. Understanding motivation: building the brain architecture that supports learning, health, and community participation. : working Paper No. 14. Cambridge (MA): Harward University; 2018.
  • National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. Young children develop in an environment of relationships., Working Paper 1. Cambridge (MA): Harward University; 2004.
  • Romeo RR, Leonard JA, Grotzinger HM, et al. Neuroplasticity associated with changes in conversational turn-taking following a family-based intervention. Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2021;49:100967.
  • Yaun J, Bach M, Bakke J, et al. Evaluation of a language and literacy enhancement program. Clin Pediatr 2019;58(1):100–109. doi: 10.1177/000992281880946.
  • Preece J, Levy R. Understanding the barriers and motivations to shared reading with young children: the role of enjoyment and feedback. J Early Child Lit. 2020;20(4):631–654. doi: 10.1177/1468798418779216.
  • Towell JL, Bartram L, Morrow S, et al. Reading to babies: exploring the beginnings of literacy. J Early Child Lit. 2019;21(3):321–337. doi: 10.1177/1468798419846199.
  • Bleses D, Höjen A. Bogstart endelig rapport [Bogstart final report]. [Aarhus]: Aarhus University; 2015. Danish.
  • Anderson J, Anderson A, Sadiq A. Family literacy programmes and young children’s language and literacy development: paying attention to families’ home language. Early Child Dev Care. 2017;187(3-4):644–654. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2016.1211119.
  • Bleses D, Dale PS, Justice L, et al. Sustained effects of an early childhood language and literacy intervention through second grade: longitudinal findings of the SPELL trial in Denmark. PLOS One. 2021;16(10):e0258287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258287.
  • Marulis LM, Neuman SB. How vocabulary interventions affect young children at risk: a meta-analytic review. J Res EducEff. 2013;6(3):223–262. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2012.755591.
  • Beard A. Speech, language and communication: a public health issue across the lifecourse. Paediatr Child Health. 2018;28(3):126–131. doi: 10.1016/j.paed.2017.12.004.
  • Law J, Levickis P. Early language development must be a public health priority. Health Visit. 2018;6(12):586–589. doi: 10.12968/johv.2018.6.12.586.
  • Fäldt A. Targeting toddlers’ communication difficulties at the Swedish child health services - a public health perspective [dissertation]. Uppsala: Uppsala University; 2020.
  • Ebbels SH, McCartney E, Slonims V, et al. Evidence-based pathways to intervention for children with language disorders. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(1):3–19. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12387.
  • Polit DF. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Eleventh edition Beck CT, editor. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
  • Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–488. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05627-6.
  • Tracy SJ. Interview practice embodied, mediated, and focus-group approaches Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact., First Edition, Chichester (UK): Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2013. p. 157–182.