PACT: Parents and children together in phonological therapy

References

• Baker E. Phonological analysis, summary and management plan. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing 2004; 6: 14–21
   Google Scholar
• Barlow J. A., Gierut J. A. Minimal pair approaches to phonological remediation. Seminars in Speech and Language 2002; 23: 57–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blache S. E., Parsons C., Humphreys J. M. A minimal word-pair model for teaching the linguistic significance of distinctive feature properties. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1981; 46: 291–296
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bleile K. M. Manual of articulation and phonological disorders: Infancy through adulthood2nd ed. Singular, San Diego, CA 2004
   Google Scholar
• Bowen C. Evaluation of a phonological therapy with treated and untreated groups of young children. Macquarie University, Sydney, 1996 Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Bowen C. Developmental phonological disorders: A practical guide for families and teachers. The Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne 1998
   Google Scholar
• Bowen C., Cupples L. A tested phonological therapy in practice. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 1998; 14: 29–50
   Google Scholar
• Bowen C., Cupples L. Parents and children together (PACT): A collaborative approach to phonological therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1999a; 34: 35–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen C., Cupples L. A phonological therapy in depth: A reply to commentaries. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1999b; 34: 65–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen C., Cupples L. The role of families in optimizing phonological therapy outcomes. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2004; 20: 245–260
   Google Scholar
• Bridgeman E., Snowling M. The perception of phoneme sequence: A comparison of dyspraxic and normal children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1988; 23: 245–252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr A. Evidence based practice in family therapy and systemic consultation: Child-focused problems. Journal of Family Therapy 2000; 22: 29–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crago M., Cole E. Using ethnography to bring children's communicative and cultural worlds into focus. Pragmatics of language. Clinical practice issues, T. Gallagher. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1991; 99–131
   Google Scholar
• Crais E. R. Moving from “parent involvement” to family-centred services. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 5 – 8 September, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Dean E., Howell J. Developing linguistic awareness: A theoretically based approach to phonological disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1986; 21: 223–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean E., Howell J., Hill A., Waters D. Metaphon Resource Pack. NFER Nelson, Windsor 1990
   Google Scholar
• Dodd B. Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder. Whurr, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Dodd B., Crosbie S., Holm A. Core vocabulary: Intervention for children with inconsistent speech disorder. University of Queensland, Brisbane 2004
   Google Scholar
• Dodd B., Hua Z., Crosbie S., Holm A., Ozanne A. Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP). Psychological Corporation, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Elbert M., Gierut J. Handbook of clinical phonology: Approaches to assessment and treatment. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1986
   Google Scholar
• Fey M. E. Clinical forum: Phonological assessment and treatment. Articulation and phonology: An introduction. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1992; 23: 224
   Google Scholar
• Finn P., Bothe A., Bramlett R. Science and pseudoscience in communication disorders: Criteria and application. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2005; 14: 172–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipsen P., Jr. Articulatory or phonological intervention: Which one?. Seminar presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), Atlanta, GA, November, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Flynn L., Lancaster G. Children's phonology sourcebook. Winslow Press, Oxford 1996
   Google Scholar
• Forrest K., Elbert M., Dinnsen D. The effect of substitution patterns on phonological treatment outcomes. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2002; 14: 519–531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J. A. Treatment efficacy: Functional phonological disorders in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1998; 41: S85–S100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J. A., Morrisette M. L., Hughes M. T., Rowland S. Phonological treatment efficacy and developmental norms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1996; 27: 215–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwell P. The phonological analysis of articulation disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1975; 10: 31–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunwell P. Clinical phonology. Croom Helm, London 1982
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell P. Phonological Assessment of Child Speech (PACS). NFER-Nelson, Windsor 1985
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell P. Process of phonological change in developmental speech disorders. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1992; 6: 101–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill A., Dean E., Howell J. Metaphon: Past, present and future. Australian Communication Quarterly 1997; 21–23, Autumn
   Google Scholar
• Hodson B. Hodson Assessment of Phonological Patterns-3 edition (HAPP-3). Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hodson B. W. Identifying phonological patterns and projecting remediation cycles: Expediting intelligibility gains of a 7 year old Australian child. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2006; 8(3)257–264
   Google Scholar
• Hodson B., Paden E. Targeting intelligible speech: A phonological approach to remediation. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Holm A., Crosbie S. Introducing Jarrod: A child with a phonological impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2006; 8(3)164–175
   Google Scholar
• Houle C. O. The literature of adult education. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA 1992
   Google Scholar
• Ingram D. Phonological disability in children. Edward Arnold, London 1976
   Google Scholar
• Ingram D. Research-practice relationships in speech-language pathology. Topics in Language Disorders 1998; 18(2)1–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamhi A. G. Clinical forum: Phonological assessment and treatment. The need for a broad-based model of phonological disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1992; 23: 261–268
   Google Scholar
• Kamhi A. G. Summary, reflections, and future directions. Phonological disorders in children: Clinical decision making in assessment and intervention, A. G. Kamhi, K. E. Pollock. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2005; 223
   Google Scholar
• Leahy J., Dodd B. The development of disordered phonology: A case study. Language and Cognitive Processes 1987; 2: 115–132
   Google Scholar
• Locke J. L. The inference of speech perception in the phonologically disordered child. Part II. Some clinically novel procedures, their use, some findings. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1980; 45: 445–468
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Logemann J. A., Gardner P. M. Help find the evidence-clinicians wanted. The ASHA Leader 16 August, 2005; 8–9
   Google Scholar
• Minuchin S., Lee W. Y., Simon G. Mastering family therapy: Journeys of growth and transformation. Wiley & Sons, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Miccio A. W. A treatment program for enhancing stimulability. Phonological disorders in children: Clinical decision making in assessment and intervention, A. G. Kamhi, K. E. Pollock. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2005; 163–173
   Google Scholar
• Miccio A. W., Elbert M., Forrest K. The relationship between stimulability and phonological acquisition in children with normally developing and disordered phonologies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1999; 8: 347–363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan D. Remediation of common phonological processes. Four case studies. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1986; 17: 187–198
   Google Scholar
• Nathan L., Wells B. Can children with speech difficulties process an unfamiliar accent?. Applied Psycholinguistics 2001; 22: 343–361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Toole T., Logemann J. A., Baum H. M. Conducting clinical trials in the public schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1998; 29: 257–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olswang L. B. Treatment efficacy research: A path to quality assurance. ASHA 1990; January: 45–47
   Google Scholar
• Reimers S. Understanding alliances: How can research inform user-friendly practice?. Journal of Family Therapy 2001; 23: 46–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew S., Rafaat S., Martin M. Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1999; 8: 33–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg L. D., Kwiatkowski J. Phonological disorders I: A diagnostic classification system. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1982; 47: 226–241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon C. Evaluation of phonological skills in pre-school children. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon C., Dunn C. Normal and abnormal phonology in children. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1985
   Google Scholar
• van Kleeck A. Potential cultural bias in training parents as conversational partners with their children who have delays in language development. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1994; 3: 67–78
   Google Scholar
• Van Riper C. Speech correction: Principles and methods. Prentice-Hall, New York 1934
   Google Scholar
• Velleman S. Phonotactic therapy. Seminars in Speech and Language 2002; 23: 43–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watts Pappas N., Bowen C. Speech acquisition and the family. The international guide to speech acquisition, S. McLeod. Thomson Delmar Learning, Clifton Park, NY, in press
   Google Scholar
• Watts Pappas N., McLeod S., McAllister L., Simpson T. Partnerships with parents in speech intervention: A review. Speech Pathology Australia National Conference, L. Brown, C. Heine. Speech Pathology Australia, Canberra 2005; 62–73
   Google Scholar
• Weiner F. Treatment of phonological disability using the method of meaningful contrast: Two case studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1981; 46: 97–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westby C. E. Ethnographic interviewing: Asking the right questions to the right people in the right way. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders 1990; 13: 101–111
   Google Scholar
• Williams A. L. Generalization patterns associated with training least phonological knowledge. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 722–733
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams A. L. Multiple oppositions: Theoretical foundations for an alternative contrastive intervention approach. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2000; 9: 282–288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. L. Sound Contrasts in Phonology (SCIP). Thinking Publications, Eau Claire, WI 2006
   Google Scholar
• Williams P., Stephens H. Nuffield Centre Dyspraxia Programme. Miracle Factory, Windsor 2004
   Google Scholar
• Young E. C. A language approach to treatment of phonological process problems. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1983; 14: 38–46
   Google Scholar