The impact of selecting different contrasts in phonological therapy

References

• Baker E, McLeod S. Evidence-based management of phonological impairment in children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2004; 20: 265–285
   Google Scholar
• Bauman-Waengler J. Articulatory and phonological impairments: A clinical focus. Allyn & Bacon, Boston 2004
   Google Scholar
• Blache S, Parsons C. A linguistic approach to distinctive feature training. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 1980; 11: 203–207
   Google Scholar
• Bowen C. Children's speech sound disorders: A practical update. 2005, Speech Pathology Australia Continuing Professional Development Tour
   Google Scholar
• Bradford-Heit A, Dodd B. Learning new words using imitation and additional cues: differences between children with disordered speech. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 1998; 14: 159–179
   Google Scholar
• Broomfield J, Dodd B. The nature of referred subtypes of primary speech disability. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2004; 20: 135–151
   Google Scholar
• Carter E, Buck M. Prognostic testing for functional articulation disorders among children in the first grade. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1958; 23: 124–133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crosbie S, Holm A, Dodd B. Intervention for children with severe speech disorder: A comparison of two approaches. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2005; 40: 467–491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean E, Howell J. Developing linguistic awareness: A theoretically based approach to phonological disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1986; 21: 223–238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dodd B, Bradford A. A comparison of three therapy methods for children with different types of developmental phonological disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2000; 35: 189–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd B., Crosbie S., Zhu H., Holm A., Ozanne A. The Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology. Psych–Corp, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Dodd B., Holm A., Zhu H., Crosbie S. Phonological development: normative data from British English-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 2003; 17: 617–643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn L., Dunn L. The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 1997
   Google Scholar
• Felsenfeld S., Broen P., McGue M. A 28-year follow-up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: Linguistic and personality results. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1994; 37: 1341–1353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrier E., Davis M. A lexical approach to the remediation of sound omissions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1973; 38: 126–130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujiki M., Brinton B., Isaacson T., Summers C. Social behaviours of children with language impairment on the playground. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2001; 32: 101–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J. Enhancement of learning for children with phonological disorders. Sound to Sense 2004; B164–B172, 11–13 June, MIT
   Google Scholar
• Gierut J. Complexity in phonological treatment: Clinical factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 2001; 32: 229–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J. Treatment efficacy: Functional phonological disorders in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1998; 41: S85–S100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J. The conditions and course of clinically induced phonological change. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992; 35: 1049–1063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut J. Homonymy in phonological change. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1991; 5: 119–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut J. Differential learning of phonological oppositions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 540–549
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut J. Maximal opposition approach to phonological treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 9–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut J., Neumann H. Teaching and learning //: A non-confound. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1992; 6: 191–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon G. Phonological awareness: From research to practice. The Guilford Press, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell P. Natural phonology. The new phonologies development in clinical linguistics, M. Ball, R. Kent. Singular Publishing, San Diego, CA 1997; 35–75
   Google Scholar
• Holm A., Crosbie S, Dodd B. Phonological approaches to intervention. Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder, B Dodd. Whurr, London 2005; 163–181
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster G., Pope L. Working with children's phonology. Winslow Press, Oxon 1989
   Google Scholar
• McLeod S., Baker E. Current clinical practice for children with speech impairment. Proceedings of the 26^th World Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, B. Murdoch, J. Goozee, B. Whelan, K. Docking. University of Queensland, Brisbane 2004
   Google Scholar
• Ozanne A. Childhood apraxia of speech. Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder, B Dodd. Whurr, London 2005; 71–82
   Google Scholar
• Robey R., Schultz M. A model for conducting clinical outcome research: an adaptation of the standard protocol fort use in aphasiology. Aphasiology 1998; 12: 787–810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saben C., Ingham J. The effects of minimal pairs treatment on the speech-sound production of two children with phonologic disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 1023–1040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Square P. Treatment approaches for developmental apraxia of speech. Clinics in Communication Disorders 1994; 4: 151–161
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon C., Stone-Goldman J., Glaspey A. Pattern-based approaches to phonological therapy. Seminars in Speech and Language 2002; 23: 3–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler A., Edwards M., Saxman J. Clinical application of two phonologically based treatment procedures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1987; 52: 393–409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiner F. Treatment of phonological disability using the method of meaningful minimal contrast: Two case studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1981; 46: 97–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar