Using Critical Policy Analysis in Occupational Science Research: Exploring Bacchi's Methodology

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, R. M. (2011). Discouraged worker's daily occupations: Exploring complex transactions in the experience of unemployment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57. doi:10.1080/01596300050005493
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2005). Discourse, discourse everywhere: Subject “agency” in feminist discourse methodology. Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 198–209. doi:10.1080/0803874060060407
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest, New South Wales: Pearson Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., & Eveline, J. (2010). Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory. Adelaide, South Australia: University of Adelaide Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belzile, L. M. (2008). Good for all students: A Foucauldian interrogation of teachers' discourse of inclusion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Alberta: Edmonton, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Breeden, L. J. (2008). Transformative occupations: life experiences of performers with disabilities in film and television. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Breeden, L. (2012). Transformative occupation in practice: Changing media images and lives of people with disabilities. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 32(1), S15–S24. doi:10.3928/15394492-20110906-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. E., & Clark, F. A. (1991). The search for useful methodologies in occupational science. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 235–241. doi:10.5014/ajot.45.3.235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek, J., & Porter, S. (1997). Reviewing Foucault: Possibilities and problems from nursing and health care. Nursing Inquiry, 4, 108–119. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.1997.tb00084.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cort, P. (2011). Taking the Copenhagen process apart: Critical readings of European vocational education and training policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (Eds.). (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1995). Governing the unemployed self in an active society. Economy and Society, 24(4), 559–583. doi:10.1080/03085149500000025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds, G. (2010). New academies, old problems: An analysis of dominant discourses and their effects on equity in English education policy making. Unpublished master's thesis. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, B., Goodwin, S., Meagher, G., & Phillips, R. (2010). Social policy for social change. Melbourne, Victoria: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2003). Critical social work: The current issues. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 123–130. doi:10.1177/1473325003002002001
   Google Scholar
• Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Gidley, J. M., Hampson, G. P., Wheeler, L., & Bereded-Samuel, E. (2010a). From access to success: An integrated approach to quality higher education informed by social inclusion theory and practice. Higher Education Policy, 23, 123–147. doi:10.1057/hep.2009.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidley, J., Hampson, G., Wheeler, L., & Bereded-Samuel, E. (2010b). Social inclusion: Context, theory and practice. Australasian Journal of University-Community Engagement, 5(1), 6–36.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, S. (2011). Analysing policy as discourse: Methodological advances in policy analysis. In L. Markauskaite, P. Freebody & J. Irwin (Eds.), Methodological choice and design: Scholarship, policy and practice in social and educational research (pp. 167–180). London, United Kingdom: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2008). Reflections on … well-being and occupational rights. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W., & Iwama, M. K. (2012). Well-being and occupational rights: An imperative for critical occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(5), 385–394. doi:10.3109/11038128.2011.611821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2000). Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 58–67. doi:10.1080/14427591.2000.9686466
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C., & Whiteford, G. E. (2012). Introduction to critical perspectives in occupational science. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 3–7). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1995). Struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts (Trans: Anderson, J.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama, M. (2003). The issue is … toward culturally relevant epistemologies in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(5), 217–223. doi:10.5014/ajot.57.5.582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K. E. (1994). Method and methodology in feminist research: What is the difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20(1), 19–22. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20010019.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A. (2012). Knowledge paradigms in occupational science: Pluralistic perspectives. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 69–85). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2005). Understanding political influences on occupational possibilities: An analysis of newspaper constructions of retirement. Journal of Occupational Science, 12(3), 149–160. doi:10.1080/14427591.2005.9686558
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational terminology: Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2012). Governing through occupation: Shaping expectations and possibilities. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 100–116). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Adding a political dimension to inquiry. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 169–182). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Huot, S. (2013). Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 51–64). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. (1996). The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony. Critical Social Policy, 16, 5–20. doi:10.1177/026101839601604601
   Google Scholar
• Lo Bartolo, L., & Sheahan, M. (2009). Industrial relations reform and the occupational transition of Australian workers: A critical discourse analysis. Work, 32(4), 407–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Motion, J., & Leitch, S. (2007). A toolbox for public relations: The oeuvre of Michel Foucault. Public Relations Review, 33, 263–268. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njelesani, J., Tang, A., Jonsson, H., & Polatajko, H. ( In press). Articulating an occupational perspective. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.717500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2012, May). Methodological considerations for occupational science research: Exploring Bacchi's ‘What's the problem represented to be?’ approach. Paper presented at the Canadian Society of Occupational Scientists Conference, Edmonton, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2013). The politics of participation: A critical occupational science analysis of social inclusion policy and entrenched disadvantage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., & Stagnitti, K. (2008). The meaning of leisure for well-elderly Italians in an Australian community: Implications for occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55(1), 39–46. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00653.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., & Whiteford, G. (2012, May). Where economics meets occupational science: Expanding occupational deprivation discourse through Amartya Sen's capability approach. Paper presented at the Canadian Society of Occupational Scientists Conference, Edmonton, Canada, .
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., & Whiteford, G. E. (2013). Understanding social inclusion as an international discourse: Implications for enabling participation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(2), 112–115. doi:10.4276/030802213X13603244419392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., & Kinsella, E. A. (2009). Occupational identity: Engaging socio-cultural perspectives. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 85–91. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686647
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2012). Promise. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(4), 298–311. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.667778
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D., Atler, K., Baltisberger, J., Fehringer, E., Hunter, E., Malkawi, S., & Parr, T. (2010). Occupational science: A data-based American perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(4), 204–215. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686697
   Google Scholar
• Powers, P. (2007). The philosophical foundations of Foucaultian discourse analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 1(2), 18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Scheurich, J. J., & McKenzie, K. B. (2005). Foucault's methodologies: Archaeology and geneology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 841–868). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, B. (2012). Occupation and ideology. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 86–99). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. H., & Deranty, J-P. (2012). Work and the politics of misrecognition. Res Publica, 18(1), 53–64. doi:10.1007/s11158-012-9185-3
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk, R. L., Townsend, E. A., & Wilcock, A. A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 328–358). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S., & Yar, M. (Eds.). (2011). The politics of misrecognition: Rethinking political and international theory. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. (1997). Occupation: Potential for personal and social transformation. Journal of Occupational Science, 4(1), 18–26. doi:10.1080/14427591.1997.9686417
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. A. (2012). Boundaries and bridges to adult mental health: Critical occupational and capabilities perspectives of justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 8–24. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.639723
   Google Scholar
• Vellacott, J. W. (2011). Walking the talk? Models of disability and discourse in employment policy for Canadians with disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Vancouver, British Columbia: The University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. (1997). The ‘Active Society’: New designs for social policy. Policy & Politics, 25(3), 221–234.10.1332/030557397782453264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (2010). Occupation in context. In M. Curtin, M. Molineux & J. Supyk-Mellson (Eds.), Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: Enabling occupation (6th ed., pp. 135–150). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Hocking, C. (Eds.) (2012). Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Pereira, R. B. (2012). Occupation, participation and inclusion. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.) Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 187–208). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., & Townsend, E. (2011). Participatory Occupational Justice Framework (POJF 2010): Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders - Volume 2: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices (pp. 65–84). London, United Kingdom: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. & Wright-St Clair, V. (Eds.) (2005). Occupation & practice in context. Marrickville, New South Wales: Elsevier Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, A. (2003). Understanding occupational potential across the life course: Life stories of older women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Albury, Australia: Charles Sturt University.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, A. (2011, May). An occupational perspective of social inclusion: Fostering older people's social inclusion through participation in occupation. Public lecture presented at Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2012). Position statement: Occupational science revised [Online]. Retrieved October 15, 2012 from http://www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Wright-St Clair, V. A. (2012). The case for multiple research methodologies. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 137–151). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E., Clark, F., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Parham, D., Pierce, D. … & Zemke, R. (1990). An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17. doi:10.1080/J003v06n04_04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar