Enhancing construct validity evidence of the Daily Experiences of Pleasure, Productivity and Restoration Profile

References

• American Educational Research Association (AERA). (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Atler, K. (2012). The development and initial validation of the Daily Experiences of Pleasure, Productivity and Restoration Profile (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Atler, K. (2014a). An argument for a dynamic interrelated view of occupational experience. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(3), 249–259. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.887991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atler, K. (2014b). The Daily Experiences of Pleasure, Productivity and Restoration Profile: A measure of subjective experiences. In D. Pierce (Ed.), Occupational science for occupational therapy (pp. 187–199). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Atler, K. (2015). User-perceived utility of the Daily Experiences of Pleasure, Productivity, and Restoration Profile. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1–10. doi:10.1177/0008417415571731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balajti, H., Darago, L., Adany, R., & Kosa, K. (2010). College students’ response rate to an incentivized combination of postal and web-based health survey. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 33, 164–176. doi:10.1177/0163278710361927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings in life. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bejerholm, U., & Eklund, M. (2006). Construct validity of a newly developed instrument: Profile of occupational engagement in people with schizophrenia, POES. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60, 200–206. doi:10.1080/08039480600636239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Ender, P., Mitchell, M., & Wells, C. (2003). Regression with SPSS. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/webbooks/reg/default.htm
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. (2006). One person's thoughts on the future of occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(3), 167–179. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9726513
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2014). Review of the day of reconstruction method (DRM). Social Indicators Research, 116(1), 255–267. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0279-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doble, S., & Santha, J. (2008). Occupational well-being: Rethinking occupational therapy outcomes. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(3), 184–190. doi:10.1177/000841740807500310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dockray, S., Grant, N., Stone, A., Kahneman, D., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2010). A comparison of affect ratings obtained with ecological momentary assessment and the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 99, 269–283. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40927591 doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9578-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakman, A. M. (2011). Convergent validity of the engagement in meaningful activities survey in a college sample. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 31(1), 23–32. doi:10.3928/15394492-20100122-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakman, A. M. (2013). Relationships between meaningful activity, basic psychological needs, and meaning in life: Test of the meaningful activity and life meaning model. OTJR: Occupation Participation and Health, 33(2), 100–109. doi:10.3928/15394492-20130222-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakman, A. M. (2014). A prospective longitudinal study testing relationships between meaningful activities, basic psychological needs fulfillment, and meaning in life. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 34(2), 93–105. doi:10.3928/15394492-20140211-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakman, A. M. (2015). Meaning, sense-making and spirituality. In C. H. Christiansen & C. M. Baum (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being (4th ed., pp. 311–329). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Eakman, A. M., & Eklund, M. (2011). Reliability and structural validity of an assessment of occupational value. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(3), 231–240. doi:10.3109/11038128.2010.521948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakman, A. M., & Eklund, M. (2012). The relative impact of personality traits, meaningful occupation and occupational value on meaning in life and life satisfaction. Journal of Occupational Science 19(2), 165–177. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.671762
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, M. (2004). Satisfaction with daily occupations: A tool for client evaluation in mental health care. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11, 136–142. doi:10.1080/11038120410020700
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, M., Erlandsson, L., & Persson, D. (2003). Occupational value among individuals with long-term mental illness. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(5), 276–284. doi:10.1177/000841740307000504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eklund, M., & Leufstadius, C. (2007). Relationships between occupational factors and health and well-being in individuals with persistent mental illness living in the community. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(4), 303–313. doi:10.1177/000841740707400403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eklund, M., Leufstadius, C., & Bejerholm, U. (2009). Time use among people with psychiatric disabilities: Implications for practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 32(3), 177–191. doi:10.2975/32.3.2009.177.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, L., Eklund, M., & Persson, D. (2011). Occupational value and relationships to meaning and health: Elaborations of the ValMO-model. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(1), 72–80. doi:10.3109/11038121003671619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662240510590360 doi: 10.1108/10662240510590360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, K., & Gershuny, J. (2013). Multinational time use study user's guide and documentation (6th ed.). Oxford, UK. Retrieved from http://www.timeuse.org/sites/ctur/files/858/mtus-user-guide-r6-july-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, B., Brintnell, E. S., & Goldberg, J. (2002). The relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and quality of life in persons disabled by mental illness. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 18(2), 17–44. doi:10.1300/J004v18n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Geurts, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 32(6), 482–492. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40967600 doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman, S., & Schindler, V. (2007). The neurological basis of occupation. Occupational Therapy International, 14(2), 71–85. doi:10.1002/oti
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2009). Self-care, productivity, and leisure, or dimensions of occupational experience? Rethinking occupational “categories”. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(2), 107–114. doi:10.1177/000841740907600208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselkus, B. (2006). 2006 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture - The world of everyday occupation: Real people, real lives. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(6), 627–640. doi:10.5014/ajot.60.6.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselkus, B. (2011). The meaning of everyday occupation (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–80. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2009). Contribution of occupation to health and well-being. In E. Crepeau, E. Cohn & B. Schell (Eds.), Willard & Spackman's occupational therapy (12th ed., pp. 45–54). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Mandel, D., Zemke, R., & Clark, F. (1998). Occupation in lifestyle redesign: The well elderly study occupational therapy program. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(5), 326–336. doi:10.5014/ajot.52.5.326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, H., & Persson, D. (2006). Towards an experiential model of occupational balance: An alternative perspective on flow theory analysis. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 62–73. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686571
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780. doi:10.1126/science.1103572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, C., & Haidt, J. (Eds.). (2003). Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Keyes, C., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2012). Positive affect and meaning in life. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 125–141). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179–196. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klumb, P., & Baltes, M. (1999). Time use of old and very old Berliners: Productive and consumptive activities as functions of resources. Journal of Gerontology, 54B, S271–S278. doi:10.1093/geronb/54B.5.S271
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, M. (1999). Methods and concepts for time-budget research on elders. In W. Pentland, A. Harvey, M. Lawton & M. McColl (Eds.), Time use research in the social sciences (pp. 107–125). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.library.colostate.edu:2048/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuska, K., & Christiansen, C. (2008). A proposed model of lifestyle balance. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(1), 9–19. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686602
   Google Scholar
• McColl, M., Paterson, M., Davies, D., Doubt, L., & Law, M. (2000). Validity and community utility of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 22–30. doi:10.1177/000841740006700105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175249 doi: 10.3102/0013189X018002005
   Google Scholar
• Mesquita, B., Feldman Barret, L., & Smith, E. (2010). The mind in context. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. (1922). The philosophy of occupation therapy. Archives of Occupation Therapy, 1, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Netemeyer, R., Bearden, W., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.library.colostate.edu:2048/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164 doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164
   Google Scholar
• Persson, D., Erlandsson, L., Eklund, M., & Iwarsson, S. (2001). Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation: A tentative structure for analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8(1), 7–18. doi:10.1080/110381201300078447
   Google Scholar
• Persson, D., & Jonsson, H. (2009). Importance of experiential challenges in a balanced life. In K. Matuska & C. Christiansen (Eds.), Life balance: Multidisciplinary theories and research (pp. 133–147). Thorofare, NJ: Slack & AOTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2001). Untangling occupation and activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 138–146. doi:00000448-200103000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2003). Occupation by design: Building therapeutic power. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2012). The 2011 Ruth Zemke lecture in occupational science - Promise. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(4), 298–311. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.667778
   Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T. (2012). Why researchers should think ‘real-world’: A conceptual rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, J. A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21(4), 37–59. doi:10.1300/J079v21n04_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S., Waterman, A., Vazsonyi, A., Zamboanga, B., Whitbourne, S., Vernon, M., … Ham, L. (2011). The association of well-being with health risk behaviors in college-attending young adults. Applied Developmental Science, 15(1), 20–36. doi:10.1080/10888691.2011.538617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22–42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., Kielhofner, G., & Watts, J. (1986). The relationship between volition, activity pattern and life satisfaction in the elderly. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40(4), 278–283. doi:10.5014/ajot.40.4.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hooff, M., Geurts, S., Beckers, D., & Kompier, M. (2011). Daily recovery from work: The role of activities, effort and pleasure. Work & Stress, 25(1), 55–74. doi:10.1080/02678373.2011.570941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1998). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journals of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (2006). An occupational perspective of health (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Winwood, P., Bakker, A., & Winefield, A. (2007). An investigation of the role of non-work-time behavior in buffering the effects of work strain. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49(8), 862–871. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e318124a8dc
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright-St Clair, V. A., & Hocking, C. (2014). Occupational science: The study of occupation. In E. S. Cohn (Ed.), Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (12th ed., pp. 82–94). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E., Clark, F., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Parham, D., Pierce, D., … Zemke, R. (1990). An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st Century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17. doi:10.1080/J003v06n04_04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar