Engagement in occupation as an inquiring process: Exploring the situatedness of occupation

References

• Aldrich, R. M. (2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 147–156. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686624
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. M. (2011). A review and critique of well-being in occupational therapy and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(2), 93–100. doi: 10.3109/11038121003615327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. M., & Cutchin, M. P. (2013). Dewey’s concepts of embodiment, growth, and occupation: Extended bases for a transactional perspective. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 13–23). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2015). Situational analysis: A visual analytic approach that unpacks the complexity of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 51–66. doi:10.1080/14427591.2015.1045014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, T. M. (2012). John Dewey’s theory of art, experience, and nature: The horizons of feeling. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, A. F., & Dewey, J. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. (2004). Psychology as a moral science: Aspects of John Dewey’s psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 17(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1177/0952695104043579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. (2011). Dewey’s neglected psychology: Rediscovering his transactional approach. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 298–317. doi: 10.1177/0959354310376123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorsson, A., Öhman, A., Lundberg, S., & Nygård, L. (2011). Accessibility in public space as perceived by people with Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia, 10(4), 587–602. doi:10.1177/14713012114153142011 doi: 10.1177/1471301211415314
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F., & Lawlor, M. (2009). The making and mattering of occupational science. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn & B. A. Boyt Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 98–112). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P. (2004). Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(3), 303–312. doi:10.5014/ajot.58.3.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P. (2007). From society to self (and back) through place: Habit in transactional context. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health, 27, 50S–59S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P. (2013). The art and science of occupation: Nature, inquiry, and the aesthetics of living. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 286–297. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.744290
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. E. Whiteford, & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., Aldrich, R. M., Bailliard, A. L., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 157–165. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (Eds.). (2013a). Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2013b). Transactional perspectives on occupation: An introduction and rationale. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 1–10). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, B. (1997). Given a context by any other name: Methodological tools for taming the unruly beast. Information Seeking in Context, 13, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company. (Original work published 1925)
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Dover Publications, ICN.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2004). Democracy and education. Boston, MA: Courier Corporation. (Original work published 1916)
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. A. (2010). Are occupations ‘processes too complicated to explain’? What we can learn by trying. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(4), 195–203. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686696
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. A., & Cutchin, M. P. (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation: Main points of contribution in this volume. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 257–261). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16. doi:10.1177/1558689809349691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2013). Twenty-first century pragmatism and social justice: Problematic situations and occupational reconstructions in post-civil war Guatemala. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 229–243). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2015). The contextually situated nature of occupational choice: Marginalised young adolescents’ experiences in South Africa. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 39–53. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.912124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(4), 275–296. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0804_02
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists’ ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford, & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 54–66). West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Holahan, L. F. (2014). Quality-in-doing: Competence and occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 473–487. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.815683
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, B., & Wood, W. (2002). Pragmatism and structuralism in occupational therapy: The long conversation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(1), 40–50. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.1.40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. doi:10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, A. V. (2015). Beyond independence: Introducing Deweyan philosophy to the dialogue on occupation and independence. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 17–25. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.803297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, C. C. (2005). Experience and inquiry in John Dewey’s contextualism. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of South Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, A. (2011). A transactional view: Occupation as a means to create experiences that matter. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(2), 131–138. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.575759
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, N. (2010). Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, J., Kanstrup, A., & Josephsson, S. (2016). The assumed relation between occupation and inequality in health. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 23(1), 1–12. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1075065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, B. (1998). The story of philosophy. London: Dorling Kindersley.
   Google Scholar
• Milbourn, B. T., McNamara, B. A., & Buchanan, A. J. (2014). Understanding the episodic everyday of disrupted lives: Scoping the occupational therapy literature. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(3), 144–153. doi:10.1177/0008417414533315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, E. C. (1961). American pragmatism: Peirce, James, and Dewey. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prodinger, B., Rudman, D. L., & Shaw, L. (2015). Institutional ethnography: Studying the situated nature of human occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 71–81. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.813429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, L., & Johansson, K. (2013). Where the transactions happen: The unit of analysis when applying a transactional perspective. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 147–156). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, I. (2013). Four pragmatists: A critical introduction to Peirce, James, Mead, and Dewey. New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1974)
   Google Scholar
• Shalin, D. N. (1986). Pragmatism and social interactionism. American Sociological Review, 51, 9–29. doi: 10.2307/2095475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shank, K. H., & Cutchin, M. P. (2010). Transactional occupations of older women aging-in-place: Negotiating change and meaning. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 4–13. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686666
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (2001). Living across and through skins: Transactional bodies, pragmatism, and feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, H. S. (1970). Pragmatism, the classic writings: Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Clarence Irving Lewis, John Dewey, George Herbert Mead. Indianapolis, CA: Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van Nes, F., Jonsson, H., Hirschler, S., Abma, T., & Deeg, D. (2012). Meanings created in co-occupation: Construction of a late-life couple’s photo story. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(4), 341–357. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.679604
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (1990). An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/J003v06n04_04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (2002). Habits in context: A synthesis, with implications for research in occupational science. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 22(1 suppl), 104S–110S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar