Keeping occupation front and centre to address the challenges of transcending the individual

References

• Aldrich, R. (2011). A review and critique of well-being in occupational therapy and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(2), 93–100. doi: 10.3109/11038121003615327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R., & Rudman, D. L. (2016). Situational analysis: A visual analytic approach that unpacks the complexity of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 51–66. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2015.1045014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnost, A. (2013). Securing the home front: The Pursuit of “natural living” among evangelical Christian homemakers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(2), 274–295. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxt007
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1281–1289. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, W. K., Kang, H., Zick, C. D., & Chan, A. Y. (2004). Measuring housework in time use surveys. Review of Economics of the Household, 2(1), 23–47. doi:10.1007/s11150-005-4945-x doi: 10.1023/B:REHO.0000018021.36768.37
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, T. W. C., Clemson, L., O’Loughlin, K., & Shuttleworth, R. (2016). Understanding decision-making towards housework among women with upper limb repetitive strain injury. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 63(1), 37–46. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crider, C., Calder, R., Bunting, K. L., & Forwell, S. (2015). An integrative review of occupational science and theoretical literature exploring transition. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(3), 304–319. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.922913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, E. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 418–430. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, M., & Albanese, P. (2007). What is household work? A critique of assumptions underlying empirical studies of housework and an alternative approach. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 32(2), 227–258. doi: 10.2307/20460633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogelberg, D., & Frauwirth, S. (2010). A complexity science approach to occupation: Moving beyond the individual. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(3), 131–139. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2010.9686687
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L.-J., & Zheng, Y. (2012). Sex roles and division of household labor in married couples. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 26(7), 543–546.
   Google Scholar
• Gjerdingen, D. K., & Center, B. A. (2005). The relationship of postpartum partner satisfaction to parents’ work, health, and social characteristics. Women & Health, 40(4), 25–39. doi: 10.1300/J013v40n04_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, J. S. (2009). The literature of occupational science: A systematic, quantitative examination of peer-reviewed publications from 1996–2006. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 92–103. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2009.9686648
   Google Scholar
• Habib, R., El Zein, K., & Hojeij, S. (2012). Hard work at home: Musculoskeletal pain among female homemakers. Ergonomics, 55(2), 201–211. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.574157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, R., El-Masri, A., & Heath, R. (2006). Women’s strategies for handling household detergents. Environmental Research, 101(2), 184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, C., & Ahlborg, G. (2010). Perceptions of employment, domestic work, and leisure as predictors of health among women and men. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(3), 150–157. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2010.9686689
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2011). Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(1), 27–33. doi: 10.4276/030802211X12947686093602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harryson, L., Alex, L., & Hammarstrom, A. (2016). “I have surly passed a limit, it is simply too much”: Women’s and men’s experiences of stress and wellbeing when living within a process of housework resignation. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 224. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2950-5 doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2920-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitch, D., Pepin, G., & Stagnitti, K. (2014a). In the footsteps of Wilcock, Part one: The evolution of doing, being, becoming and belonging. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 28(3), 231–246. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2014.898114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hitch, D., Pepin, G., & Stagnitti, K. (2014b). In the footsteps of Wilcock, Part two: The interdependent nature of doing, being, becoming and belonging. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 28(3), 247–263. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2014.898115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hitch, D., Pepin, G., & Stagnitti, K. (2014c). The Integrating Theory, Evidence and Action (ITEA) method: A procedure for helping practitioners translate theory and research into action. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77(12), 592–600. doi: 10.4276/030802214X14176260335183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitch, D., Pepin, G., & Stagnitti, K. (2017). The pan occupational paradigm: Development and key concepts. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1337808
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2016). Editorial. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(4), 399–402. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1234921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C., & Wright-St Clair, V. (2017). Editorial: Special issue on inclusion and participation. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2017.1299560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, E., & McKay, E. A. (2015). A scoping review of time-use research in occupational therapy and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 22(1), 1–12. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.934918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Occupational Science (2007). The way forward plan for ISOS. Australia: International Society for Occupational Science. Retrieved from http://isos.nfshost.com/documents/ISOS20Way20Forward20Plan20July%2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, I., & Wagman, P. (2017). Hannah Arendt’s vita activa: A valuable contribution to occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(3), 290–301. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1277780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Josephsson, S. (2016). Journal of Occupational Science special issue: Transcending the individual. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(4), 403. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1234922
   Google Scholar
• Kay, H., & Brewis, C. (2016). Understanding tattooing from an occupational science perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(3), 351–364. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1241186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner, G. (2009). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2014). Embracing and enacting an ‘occupational imagination’: Occupational science as transformative. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 373–388. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.888970
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Forwell, S. (2013). Special issue on social policy and occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 283–285. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.819598
   Google Scholar
• Landstedt, E., Harryson, L., & Hammarstrom, A. (2016). Changing housework, changing health? A longitudinal analysis of how changes in housework are associated with functional somatic symptoms. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 75(1), 31781. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v75.31781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, L., & Scott, S. (2006). Under the kitchen surface: Domestic products and conflicting constructions of home. Home Cultures, 3(1), 39–62. doi: 10.2752/174063106778053255
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, S., & Power, C. (2002). Socio-economic gradients in psychological distress: A focus on women, social roles and work-home characteristics. Social Science & Medicine, 54(5), 799–810. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00110-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizzero, A., Coate, P., & Cramm, H. (2017). Occupational disruption: A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(2), 114–127. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2017.1306791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, C. J., & McDonald, S. (2006). Recycling and the domestic division of labour: Is green pink or blue? Sociology, 40(3), 417–433. doi: 10.1177/0038038506063667
   Google Scholar
• Pluye, P., Robert, E., Cargo, M., Bartlett, G., O’Cathain, A., Griffiths, F., et al. (2011). Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Retrieved from http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com
   Google Scholar
• Regidor, E., Pascual, C., de la Fuente, L., Santos, J. M., Astasio, P., & Ortega, P. (2011). Socio-economic position, family demands and reported health in working men and women. European Journal of Public Health, 21(1), 109–115. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, A. L., & Keith, V. M. (2004). Work and housework conditions and depressive symptoms among married women: The importance of occupational status. Women & Health, 38(4), 1–17. doi: 10.1300/J013v38n04_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romich, J. L. (2007). Sharing the work. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(2), 192–222. doi: 10.1177/0272431606294837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, P. C., & Sungeun, Y. (2003). Self-sacrificing wife, gruff husband: Hee Gyung Noh’s view of terminal illness in a Korean marriage. Illness, Crisis & Loss, 11(3), 258–270. doi:10.1177/0094582X03254322 doi: 10.1177/1054137303011003006
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, J. (2016). Culturing fear: Mothers, magazines, and the discourse of disease. Journal of Popular Culture, 49(4), 759–779. doi: 10.1111/jpcu.12437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotenberg, L., Harter Griep, R., Pessanha, J., Gomes, L., Fernandes Portela, L., & De Jesus Mendes Fonseca, M. (2010). Housework and recovery from work among nursing teams: A gender perspective. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental & Occupational Health Policy, 20(4), 497–510. doi: 10.2190/NS.20.4.g
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadlo, G. (2016). Threshold concepts for educating people about human engagement in occupation: The study of human systems that enable occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(4), 496–509. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1228098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxbe, D. E., Repetti, R. L., & Graesch, A. P. (2011). Time spent in housework and leisure: Links with parents’ physiological recovery from work. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(2), 271–281. doi: 10.1037/a0023048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. (2009). An exploration into the wellbeing of the families living in the ‘suburbs in the bush’. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 33(3), 262–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00386.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, C. B., Hoga, L. A. K., Peduzzi, M., Sangaleti, C., Yonekura, E., & Silva, D. R. A. D. (2014). Integrative review: Concepts and methods used in nursing. Revista Esc Enferm USP, 48(2), 329–339. doi:10.1590/S0080-6234201400002000020 doi: 10.1590/S0080-6234201400002000019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, C. R., Acock, A. C., & Walker, A. J. (2004). Gender ideology and investment in housework: Postretirement change. Journal of Family Issues, 25(8), 1050–1071. doi: 10.1177/0192513X03261323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. E. L. (2013). Aerobic activity preferences among older Canadians: A time use perspective. Canadian Journal on Aging, 32(4), 443–451. doi: 10.1017/S0714980813000433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J. (1994). The home: An occupational ideal. Journal of Occupational Science, 1(4), 31–36. doi: 10.1080/14427591.1994.9686390
   Google Scholar
• Tao, W., Janzen, B. L., & Abonyi, S. (2010). Gender, division of unpaid family work and psychological distress in dual-earner families. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 6, 36–46. doi: 10.2174/1745017901006010036
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terpstra, M. J. (2001). The correlation between sustainable development and home hygiene. Presentation at the Institut Pasteur Euroconference, Hygiene and Health, Paris, France. American Journal of Infection Control, 29(4), 211–217. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.115684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpstra, M. J. (2003). The validity of domestic hygiene indicators in the scope of social and technological changes. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 51(4), 233. doi: 10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00037-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Træen, B., Štulhofer, A., & Carvalheira, A. (2013). The associations among satisfaction with the division of housework, partner’s perceived attractiveness, emotional intimacy, and sexual satisfaction in a sample of married or cohabiting Norwegian middle-class men. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 28(3), 215–229. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2013.808323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treas, J. (2008). Transnational older adults and their families. Transnational Families, 57(4), 468–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udofia, E. A., & Akwaowo, C. D. (2012). Pregnancy and after: What women want from their partners: Listening to women in Uyo, Nigeria. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 33(3), 112–119. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2012.693551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usdansky, M. L., & Parker, W. M. (2011). How money matters: College, motherhood, earnings, and wives’ housework. Journal of Family Issues, 32(11), 1449–1473. doi: 10.1177/0192513X11402953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga-Harris, C. (2008). Homemaking and the aesthetic and moral perimeters of the soviet home during the Khrushchev era. Journal of Social History, 41(3), 561–589. doi: 10.1353/jsh.2008.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voicu, B., Voicu, M., & Strapcová, K. (2007). Gendered housework. A cross-European analysis. Sociologia, 39(6), 502–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, X., Liang, Y., Zhu, J., & Wu, T. (2013). The effects of housework on the health of retired older adults: A preliminary investigation from the Tongji-Dongfeng cohort study, China. Plos ONE, 8(3), e57232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., Townsend, E., & Hocking, C. (2000). Reflections on a renaissance of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 61–69. doi: 10.1177/000841740006700109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whittemorre, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicks, A. (2014). Editorial: Special Issue on Population Health. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(1), 1–2. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.891289
   Google Scholar
• Wight, V. R., Bianchi, S. M., & Hunt, B. R. (2013). Explaining racial/ethnic variation in partnered women’s and men’s housework: Does one size fit all? Journal of Family Issues, 34(3), 394–427. doi: 10.1177/0192513X12437705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (2006). An occupational perspective of health (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. (2007). Occupation and health: Are they one and the same? Journal of Occupational Science, 14(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2007.9686577
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A., & Hocking, C. (2015). An occupational perspective of health (3rd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, W., & Barsalou, L. W. (2006). The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology, 119(3), 349–384. doi: 10.2307/20445349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. (2014). In search of good ideas for occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21(sup 1), 11–19. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.952882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E., Clark, F., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Parham, D., Pierce, D., et al. (1989). An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/J003v06n04_04
   Google Scholar
• Youm, Y., & Laumann, E. O. (2003). The effect of structural embeddedness on the division of household labor: A game-theoretic model using a network approach. Rationality and Society, 15(2), 243–280. doi: 10.1177/1043463103015002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zai Zai, L., Maume, D. J., & Bellas, M. L. (2000). Chinese husbands’ participation in household labor. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31(2), 191–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemke, R., & Clark, F. (Eds.). (1996). Occupational science: The evolving discipline. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar