References
- Aftenposten. (2018, October 6). Jens Veberg får posten slik. Han har aldri vært online. 400.000 nordmenn bruker ikke internet [Jens Veberg gets his mail this way. He has never been online. 400.000 Norwegians never use internet]. Aftenposten. https://www.aftenposten.no/
- Alm Andreassen, T. (2016). Professional intervention from a service user perspective. In F. Gubrium, T. Alm Andreassen, & P. E. Koren Solvang (Eds.), Reimagining the human service relationship (pp. 35–58). Colombia University Press.
- Asaba, E., Blanche, E., Jonsson, H., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Wicks, A. (2016). Positioning for the future: A vision for 2016-2021. International Society for Occupational Science. http://isos.nfshost.com/documents/Positioning%20for%20the%20future.pdf
- Askheim, O. (2016). Samproduksjon som velferdssektorens kinderegg [Co-creation as three-in-one for the health care sector]. Tidsskrift for Omsorgsforskning, 2(1), 24–36.
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist & C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
- Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1993). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Clarke, C., & Keady, J. (2002). Getting down to brass tacks: A discussion of data collection with people with dementia. In H. Wilkinson (Ed.), The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivations (pp. 25–46). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- Durocher, E., Gibson, B. E., & Rappolt, S. (2013). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
- Farias, L., Laliberte Rudman, D., Pollard, N., Schiller, S., Serrata Malfitano, A. P., Thomas, K., & van Bruggen, H. (2019). Critical dialogical approach: A methodological direction for occupation-based social transformative work. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2018.1469666
- Frank, A. W. (2005). What is dialogical research, and why should we do it? Qualitative Health Research, 15(7), 964–974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305279078
- Gramstad, A., Storli, S. L., & Hamran, T. (2014). Exploring the meaning of a new assistive technology device for older individuals. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 9(6), 493–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.921249
- Gullestad, M. (1989). Kultur og hverdagsliv: På sporet av det moderne Norge [Culture and everyday life: Tracking the modern Norway]. Universitetsforlaget.
- Holthe, T., Casagrande, F. D., Halvorsrud, L., & Lund, A. (2018). The assisted living project: A process evaluation of implementation of sensor technology in community assisted living. A feasibility study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1513572
- Holthe, T., Halvorsrud, L., Karterud, D., Hoel, K.-A., & Lund, A. (2018). Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic literature review. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 13(4), 863–886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S154717
- Holthe, T., Halvorsrud, L., Thorstensen, E., Karterud, D., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Lund, A. (2020). Community health care workers’ experiences on enacting policy on technology with citizens with mild cognitive impairment and dementia [Unpublished manuscript].
- Hulatt, I., & Lowes, L. (2005). Involving service users in health and social care research. Routledge.
- Krantz, O. (2012). Assistive devices utilisation in activities of everyday life - a proposed framework of understanding a user perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 7(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.618212
- Laliberte Rudman, D. (2016). Risk, retirement, and the “duty to age well”: Shaping productive aging citizens in Canadian newsprint media. In J. P. Polzer (Ed.), Neoliberal governance and health: Duties, risks and vulnerabilities (pp. 108–131). McGill-Queens University Press.
- Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). Occupational therapy and occupational science: Building critical and transformative alliances. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional/Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(1), 241–249. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoEN1246
- Lee, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2015). Perspective: Older adults’ adoption of technology: An integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 747–759. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12176
- McCabe, L., & Innes, A. (2013). Supporting safe walking for people with dementia: User participation in the development of new technology. Gerontechnology, 12(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2013.12.1.006.00
- Meiland, F. J., Hattink, B. J., Overmars-Marx, T., de Boer, M. E., Jedlitschka, A., Ebben, P. W., Stalpers-Croeze, I. I., Flick, S., van der Leeuw, J., Karkowski, I. P., & Droes, R. M. (2014). Participation of end users in the design of assistive technology for people with mild to severe cognitive problems; The European Rosetta project. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(5), 769–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610214000088
- Michelet, M., Engedal, K., Selbaek, G., Lund, A., Bjorklof, G. H., Horndalsveen, P. O., & Bergh, S. (2018). The validity of the Norwegian version of the Cognitive Function Instrument. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 46(3-4), 217–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000493463
- Morrison, C., & Dearden, A. (2013). Beyond tokenistic participation: Using representational artefacts to enable meaningful public participation in health service design. Health Policy, 112(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.008
- Moser, I., & Thygesen, H. (2019). Med verdier og sosiale konsekvenser i sentrum [With values and social consequences at the center]. In I. Moser (Ed.), Velferdsteknologi. En ressursbok [Welfare technology. A guide book] (pp. 45–66). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
- Njelesani, J., Gibson, B. E., Nixon, S., Cameron, D., & Polatajko, H. J. (2013). Towards a critical occupational approach to research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 207–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200109
- Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2015). Første gevinstrealiseringsrapport med anbefalinger [First report on benefits realization with recommendations] (IS-2416). https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/rapporter/gevinstrealiseringsrapporter-nasjonalt-velferdsteknologiprogram
- Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2017). Andre gevinstrealiseringsrapport med anbefalinger [Second report on benefits realization with recommendations] (IS-2557). https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/rapporter/gevinstrealiseringsrapporter-nasjonalt-velferdsteknologiprogram
- Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. (2011). Innovasjon i omsorg [Innovation in the Care Services]. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/nou-2011-11/id646812/
- Norwegian Research Council. (2015). Samfunnsansvarlig innovasjon – Et RRI-rammeverk for BIOTEK2021, NANO2021, IKTPLUSS & SAMANSVAR (v. 1.0) [Responsible Innovation - A RRI-framework]. https://www.forskningsradet.no/contentassets/1975cf4657c24ffea33d274adfff0319/rri-rammeverk.pdf/
- O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938–955. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801
- Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for ageing in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
- RAND Corporation. (2019). RAND-12 Din helse. https://fhi.no/globalassets/dokumenterfiler/skjema/brukererfaring/norsk-rand-12.pdf
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
- Romsland, G. I., Milosavljevic, K. L., & Andreassen, T. A. (2019). Facilitating non-tokenistic user involvement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0153-3
- Royal Ministry of Finance. (2013). Long-term perspectives on the Norwegian economy 2017 – A summary of main points (Meld. St. 29 (2016-2017) Report to the Storting (White Paper)). https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/meld.-st.-29-20162017/id2546674/
- Satariano, W. A., Scharlach, A. E., & Lindeman, D. (2014). Aging, place, and technology: Toward improving access and wellness in older populations. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(8), 1373–1389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314543470
- Thordardottir, B., Malmgren Fänge, A., Lethin, C., Rodriguez Gatta, D., & Chiatti, C. (2019). Acceptance and use of innovative assistive technologies among people with cognitive impairment and their caregivers: A systematic review. BioMed Research International, 2019, Article 9196729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9196729
- Thygesen, H. (2019). Velferdsteknologi og nye tjenesteløsninger. Definisjoner, kategorier, bakgrunn og etikk [Welfare technology and new service solutions. Definitions, categories, background and ethics]. In I. Moser (Ed.), Velferdsteknologi. En ressursbok [Welfare technology: A resourcebook] (pp. 25–44). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
- Townsend, E. A., & Polatajko, H. J. (2007). Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. CAOT Publications ACE.
- van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
- Walsh, S., Raman, R., Jones, K., & Aisen, P. (2006). ADCS prevention instrument project: The Mail-in Cognitive Function Screening Instrument (MCFSI). Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 20(3), S170–S178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wad.0000213879.55547.57
- Whiteford, G. E., & Hocking, C. (Eds.). (2012). Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Whiteford, G., & Pereira, R. B. (2012) Occupation, inclusion and participation. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 187–207). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Whiteford, G., & Townsend, E. (2011) Participatory occupational justice framework (POJF 2010): Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard, & Sakellariou, D. (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders - Volume 2: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices (pp. 65–84). Elsevier.
- World Health Organization. (2019). What is healthy ageing? https://www.who.int/ageing/healthy-ageing/en/
- Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). https://www.svri.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2016-01-13/HADS.pdf