Applying the go-along method to enhance understandings of occupation in context

References

• Alsaker, S., Bongaardt, R., & Josephsson, S. (2009). Studying narrative-in-action in women with chronic rheumatic conditions. Qualitative Health Research, 19(8), 1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309341478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, J., Paquette, S., & Poullaouec-Gonidec, P. (2014). Uncovering landscape values and micro-geographies of meanings with the go-along method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin-Thomas, T. E., Laliberte Rudman, D., Cameron, D., & Batorowicz, B. (2019). Participatory digital methodologies: Potential of three approaches for advancing transformative occupation-based research with children and youth. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1512054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987107081254
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M., & Derrett, S. (2014). The walking interview: An ethnographic approach to understanding disability. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 12(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580X/2014.1491
   Google Scholar
• Carpiano, R. M. (2009). Come take a walk with me: The “go-along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place, 15(1), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castrodale, M. A. (2018). Mobilizing dis/ability research: A critical discussion of qualitative go-along interviews in practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P. (2004). Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(3), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.58.3.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (Eds.). (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. A. (2011). Experiencing therapy through doing: Making quilts. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 31(4), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20101222-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duedahl, E., & Blichfeldt, B. S. (2020). To walk the talk of go-along methods: Navigating the unknown terrains of being-along. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 20(5), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2020.1766560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31(2), 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, J. M., & Bowman, J. A. (2017). Geographies on the move: A practical and theoretical approach to the mobile interview. The Professional Geographer, 69(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1229623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, G., & Polkinghorne, D. (2010). Qualitative research in occupational therapy: From the first to the second generation. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 30(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20100325-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, H., & Cutchin, M. P. (2017). The transactional perspective on occupation: A way to transcend the individual in health promotion interventions and research. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(4), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1366354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, C. M., Eisenberg, M. E., Frerich, E. A., Lechner, K. E., & Lust, K. (2012). Conducting go-along interviews to understand context and promote health. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. V., & Serrata Malfitano, A. P. (2020). Brazilian youth experiencing poverty: Everyday life in the favela. Journal of Occupational Science, 27(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1757495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, C., Huot, S., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Wijekoon, S. (2017). Qualitative-geospatial methods of exploring person-place transactions in aging adults: A scoping review. The Gerontologist, 57(3), e47–e61. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, C. L., Laliberte Rudman, D., Huot, S., Gilliland, J. A., & Pack, R. L. (2018). Toward understanding person-place transactions in neighbourhoods: A qualitative-participatory geospatial approach. The Gerontologist, 58(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, E. C., & Heatwole Shank, K. (2016). Participating at the mall: Possibilities and tensions that shape older adults’ occupations. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2015.1020851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, L. R., Mandich, A., Magalhães, L., & Orchard, T. (2011). How do we ‘see’ occupations? An examination of visual research methodologies in the study of human occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.610776
   Google Scholar
• Heatwole Shank, K. (2013). Mixed methods and pragmatism for research on occupation. In M. Cutchin & V. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 183–195). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heatwole Shank, K., & Cutchin, M. P. (2010). Transactional occupations of older women aging-in-place: Negotiating change and meaning. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2010.9686666
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2009). The challenge of occupation: Describing the things people do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686655
   Google Scholar
• Huff, S., Laliberte Rudman, D., Magalhães, L., & Lawson, E. (2020). Gendered occupation: Situated understandings of gender, womanhood and occupation in Tanzania. Journal of Occupational Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1852592
   Google Scholar
• Huot, S., Aldrich, R. M., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Stone, M. (2020). Picturing precarity through occupational mapping: Making the (im)mobilities of long-term unemployment visible. Journal of Occupational Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1821244
   Google Scholar
• Huot, S., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2015). Extending beyond qualitative interviewing to illuminate the tacit nature of everyday occupation: Occupational mapping and participatory occupation methods. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 35(3), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449215576488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonasdottir, S. K., Hand, C., Misener, L., & Polgar, J. (2018). Applying case study methodology to occupational science research. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(3), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1480409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielsgaard, K., Horghagen, S., Nielsen, D., & Kaae Kristensen, H. (2021). Moments of meaning: Enacted narratives of occupational engagement within a dementia town. Journal of Occupational Science, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1859403
   Google Scholar
• Kostakos, P., Alavesa, P., Oppenlaender, J., & Hosio, S. (2019). VR ethnography: A pilot study on the use of virtual reality ‘go-along’ interviews in Google street view. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM), Article 53, (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3368422
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007
   Google Scholar
• Lecompte, M. (2002). The transformation of ethnographic practice: Past and current challenges. Qualitative Research, 2(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200301
   Google Scholar
• Loebach, J., & Gilliland, J. (2010). Child-led tours to uncover children’s perspectives and use of neighborhood environments. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(1), 52–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.20.1.0052
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, M., Nelson, T., & Perkins, H. C. (2018). Interpretive walks: Advancing the use of mobile methods in the study of entrepreneurial farm tourism settings. Geographical Research, 56(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, C., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2019). Using participant observation to enable critical understandings of disability in later life: An illustration conducted with older adults with low vision. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919891292
   Google Scholar
• Molineux, M., & Whiteford, G. E. (2011). Occupational science: Genesis, evolution and future contribution. In E. A. S. Duncan (Ed.), Foundations for practice in occupational therapy (pp. 243–253). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mondaca, M., Josephsson, S., Borell, L., Katz, A., & Rosenberg, L. (2019). Altering the boundaries of everyday life in a nursing home context. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(6), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2018.1483426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunkoosing, K. (2005). The problems with interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 15(5), 698–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304273903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent, L. (2016). The wheeling interview: Mobile methods and disability. Mobilities, 11(4), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatajko, H. J. (2010). The study of occupation. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 57–79). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, N. A. (2020). Calibrating the go-along for the Anthropocene. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1696089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simaan, J. (2017). Olive growing in Palestine: A decolonial ethnographic study of collective daily-forms-of-resistance. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(4), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1378119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., & Reynolds, J. (2019). Reflections on the go-along: How “disruptions” can illuminate the relationships of health, place and practice. The Geographical Journal, 185(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannini, P., & Vannini, A. (2017). Wild-walking: A two-fold critique of the walk-along method. In C. Bates & A. Rhys-Taylor (Eds.), Walking through social research (pp. 178–195). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S. (2017). Pluralising the walking interview: Researching (im)mobilities with Muslim women. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(6), 786–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1228113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley Hammell, K. (2004). Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100509
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (1998). Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(5), 248–256.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2021). About occupational therapy. https://wfot.org/about/about-occupational-therapy
   Google Scholar
• Wright-St. Clair, V. (2012). The case for multiple research methodologies. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation, Part IV: Ways of doing in occupational science (pp. 137–151). Blackwell. http://hdl.handle.net/10292/2324
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (1990). An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v06n04_04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar