A Bayesian framework for 3D point cloud filtering

References

• Axelsson, P., 2000. DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33/4, 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., et al., 2007. Segmentation to the point clouds of LIDAR data based on change of Kurtosis. International Symposium Photoelectron, Detection Imaging 2007 Image Process, 6623, 66231N. doi:10.1117/12.791521
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, M. and Wei, H., 2010. Threshold-free object and ground point separation in LIDAR data. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31 (10), 1089–1099. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2010.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, M., Wei, H., and Mason, D.C., 2006. DTM generation from LIDAR data using skewness balancing. In: 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’06). IEEE, 566–569. doi:10.1109/ICPR.2006.463.
   Google Scholar
• Bayram, E., et al., 2018. Analysis of airborne LiDAR point clouds with spectral graph filtering. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE, 15 (8), 1284–1288. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2018.2834626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, C., et al., 2018. Classification of aerial photogrammetric 3D point clouds. Photogrammetric Engineering, 84 (5), 287–295. doi:10.14358/PERS.84.5.287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigdeli, B., Amini Amirkolaee, H., and Pahlavani, P., 2018. DTM generation from the point cloud using a progressive geodesic morphology and a modified Particle Swarm Optimization. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39 (23), 8450–8481. doi:10.1080/01431161.2018.1488285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretar, F. and Chehata, N., 2010. Terrain modeling from lidar range data in natural landscapes: a predictive and Bayesian framework. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing: A Publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, 48 (3), 1568–1578. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2009.2032653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S., et al., 2014. Bayesian data analysis. The Statistician. doi:10.2307/2988417.
   Google Scholar
• Brunn, A. and Weidner, U., 1998. Hierarchical Bayesian nets for building extraction using dense digital surface models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53 (5), 296–307. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00012-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., et al., 2008. Automatic classification of lidar data into ground and non-ground points. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, 37, 463–468.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., et al., 2013. A multiresolution hierarchical classification algorithm for filtering airborne LiDAR data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 82, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., et al., 2014. Smooth surface modeling of DEMs based on a regularized least squares method of thin plate spline. Mathematical Geosciences, 46 (8), 909–929. doi:10.1007/s11004-013-9519-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., et al., 2016a. An improved multi-resolution hierarchical classification method based on robust segmentation for filtering ALS point clouds. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37 (4), 950–968. doi:10.1080/01431161.2016.1142687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., et al., 2016b. A robust interpolation method for constructing digital elevation models from remote sensing data. Geomorphology, 268, 275–287. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., et al., 2020. Multi-level interpolation-based filter for airborne LiDAR point clouds in forested areas. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access, 8, 41000–41012. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976848
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., et al., 2021. Filtering airborne LiDAR point clouds based on a scale-irrelevant and terrain-adaptive approach. Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 171, 108756. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., et al., 2007. Filtering airborne laser scanning data with morphological methods. Photogrammetric Engineering, 73 (2), 175–185. doi:10.14358/PERS.73.2.175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P., et al., 2019. An improved skewness balancing filtering algorithm based on thin plate spline interpolation. Applied Sciences, 9 (1), 203–215. doi:10.3390/app9010203.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Gao, B., and Devereux, B., 2017. State-of-the-art: DTM generation using airborne LIDAR data. Sensors (Switzerland), 17 (12), 150. doi:10.3390/s17010150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. and Li, Y., 2019. A fast global interpolation method for digital terrain model generation from large LiDAR-derived data. Remote Sensing, 11 (11), 1324. doi:10.3390/rs11111324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosilla, F., et al., 2013. LiDAR data filtering and classification by skewness and kurtosis iterative analysis of multiple point cloud data categories. Applied Geomatics, 5 (3), 225–240. doi:10.1007/s12518-013-0113-9.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, T. and Mickey, R.M., 2019. Bayesian statistics for beginners. Oxford University PressOxford. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198841296.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, Z., Ozcan, K., and Atik, M.E., 2021. Classification of photogrammetric and airborne LiDAR point clouds using machine learning algorithms. Drones, 5 (4), 104. doi:10.3390/drones5040104.
   Google Scholar
• Elmqvist, M., 2000. Automatic ground modeling using laser radar data. Master’s thesis (LiTH-ISY-EX-3061). Linkoping University.
   Google Scholar
• FDA, 2010. Guidance for the use of Bayesian statistics in medical device clinical trials.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L., et al., 2021. Extraction of dense urban buildings from photogrammetric and LiDAR point clouds. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access, 9, 111823–111832. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3102632
   Google Scholar
• Held, L. and Bove, D., 2014. Applied statistical inference: likelihood and bayes. Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Zhang, C., and Fraser, C.S., 2018. Progressive filtering of airborne LiDAR point clouds using graph cuts. Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 11 (8), 2933–2944. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2839738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, H., et al., 2014. An adaptive surface filter for airborne laser scanning point clouds by means of regularization and bending energy. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 92, 98–111. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., et al., 2021. Towards semantic segmentation of urban-scale 3D point clouds: a dataset, benchmarks and challenges. Proceedings / CVPR, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, 4975–4985. doi:10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00494.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Z., et al., 2016. An improved morphological algorithm for filtering airborne LiDAR point cloud based on multi-level kriging interpolation. Remote Sensing, 8 (1), 12–16. doi:10.3390/rs8010035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, Z., et al., 2019a. An active learning method for DEM extraction from airborne LiDAR point clouds. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access, 7, 89366–89378. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926497
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Z., et al., 2019b. Automatic DTM extraction from airborne LiDAR based on expectation-maximization. Optics and Laser Technology, 112, 43–55. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.10.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X. and Yuan, Y., 2016. Deep-learning-based classification for DTM extraction from ALS point cloud. Remote Sensing, 8 (9), 730. doi:10.3390/rs8090730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenburg, M., 2019. Lastools [WWW document]. Rapidlasso GmbH. http://lastools.org [Accessed 31 Jan 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Jahromi, A.B., et al., 2011. A novel filtering algorithm for bare-earth extraction from airborne laser scanning data using an artificial neural network. Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 4 (4), 836–843. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2011.2132793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klápště, P., et al., 2020. Sensitivity analysis of parameters and contrasting performance of ground filtering algorithms with UAV photogrammetry-based and LiDAR point clouds. International Journal of Digital Earth, 13 (12), 1672–1694. doi:10.1080/17538947.2020.1791267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovanič, Ľ., et al., 2023. Review of photogrammetric and lidar applications of UAV. Applied Sciences, 13 (11), 6732. doi:10.3390/app13116732.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, K. and Pfeifer, N., 1998. Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53 (4), 193–203. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00009-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J.K., 2010. Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial with R and BUGS. Elsevier: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahivaara, T., et al., 2014. Bayesian approach to tree detection based on airborne laser scanning data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing: A Publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, 52 (5), 2690–2699. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2013.2264548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtola, V.V., et al., 2022. Digital twin of a city: Review of technology serving city needs. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 114, 102915. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., et al., 2017. Airborne LiDAR data filtering based on geodesic transformations of mathematical morphology. Remote Sensing, 9 (11), 1104. doi:10.3390/rs9111104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X. and Zhang, J., 2014. Segmentation-based filtering of airborne LiDAR point clouds by progressive densification of terrain segments. Remote Sensing, 6 (2), 1294–1326. doi:10.3390/rs6021294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, W.L., et al., 2009. A hybrid conditional random field for estimating the underlying ground surface from airborne LiDAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing: A Publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, 47 (8), 2913–2922. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2009.2017738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguya, A.S., Junttila, V., and Kauranne, T., 2013. Adaptive algorithm for large scale dtm interpolation from lidar data for forestry applications in steep forested terrain. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 85, 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltezos, E., Kyrkou, A., and Ioannidis, C., 2016. LIDAR vs dense image matching point clouds in complex urban scenes. Fourth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geo-Information of Environment, 9688, 96881. doi:10.1117/12.2240475
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X., et al., 2009. A multi-directional ground filtering algorithm for airborne LIDAR. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64 (1), 117–124. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X., Wang, L., and Currit, N., 2009. Morphology-based building detection from airborne lidar data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 75 (4), 437–442. doi:10.14358/PERS.75.4.437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongus, D., Lukač, N., and Žalik, B., 2014. Ground and building extraction from LiDAR data based on differential morphological profiles and locally fitted surfaces. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 93, 145–156. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongus, D. and Žalik, B., 2014. Computationally efficient method for the generation of a digital terrain model from airborne LiDAR. Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7 (1), 340–351. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2262996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, S., et al., 2017. A revised progressive TIN densification for filtering airborne LiDAR data. Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 104, 70–77. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2017.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, A., 2004. Bayesian statistics: principles and benefits. In: M.A.J.S. van Boekel, A. Stein and A.H.C. van Bruggen, eds. Bayesian statistics and quality modelling in the agro-food production chain. Dordrecht: Springer, 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Olivatto, T.F., Inguaggiato, F.F., and Stanganini, F.N., 2023. Urban mapping and impacts assessment in a Brazilian irregular settlement using UAV-based imaging. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 29, 100911. doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100911
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan, A.H. and Unsalan, C., 2017. LiDAR data filtering and DTM generation using empirical mode decomposition. Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10 (1), 360–371. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2543464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan, A.H., Ünsalan, C., and Reinartz, P., 2018. Ground filtering and DTM generation from DSM data using probabilistic voting and segmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39 (9), 2860–2883. doi:10.1080/01431161.2018.1434327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, E. and Remondino, F., 2019. Classification of aerial point clouds with deep learning. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information - ISPRS Arch, 42, 103–110. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-103-2019
   Google Scholar
• Pargieła, K., 2023. Optimising UAV data acquisition and processing for photogrammetry: a review. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 17 (3), 29–59. doi:10.7494/geom.2023.17.3.29.
   Google Scholar
• Pingel, T.J., Clarke, K.C., and McBride, W.A., 2013. An improved simple morphological filter for the terrain classification of airborne LIDAR data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 77, 21–30. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayburg, S., Thoms, M., and Neave, M., 2009. A comparison of digital elevation models generated from different data sources. Geomorphology, 106 (3–4), 261–270. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizaldy, A., et al., 2018. Ground and multi-class classification of airborne laser scanner point clouds using fully convolutional networks. Remote Sensing, 10 (11), 1723. doi:10.3390/rs10111723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeq, H.A.-J., 2021. Building extraction from lidar data using statistical methods. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 87 (1), 33–42. doi:10.14358/PERS.87.1.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammartano, G. and Spanò, A., 2016. DEM generation based on UAV photogrammetry data in critical areas. GISTAM 2016 - Proceeding 2nd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management, 92–98. doi:10.5220/0005918400920098.
   Google Scholar
• Shan, J. and Sampath, A., 2005. Urban DEM generation urban DEM generation from raw lidar data: a labeling algorithm and its performance urban DEM generation from raw lidar data: a labeling algorithm and its performance. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 71 (2), 217–226. doi:10.14358/PERS.71.2.217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X., et al., 2018. A parameter-free progressive TIN densification filtering algorithm for lidar point clouds. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39 (20), 6969–6982. doi:10.1080/01431161.2018.1468109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, J.S., Painter, I.S., and Weir, B.S., 1999. Bayesian statistics in genetics a guide for the uninitiated. Trends in Genetics, 15 (9), 354–358. doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01751-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sithole, G. 2001. Filtering of laser altimetry data using a slope adaptive filter. International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34 (3/W4), 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Sithole, G. and Vosselman, G., 2004. Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 59 (1–2), 85–101. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2004.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sithole, G. and Vosselman, G., 2005. Filtering of airborne laser scanner data based on segmented point clouds. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36, 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Susaki, J., 2012. Adaptive slope filtering of airborne lidar data in urban areas for Digital Terrain Model (DTM) generation. Remote Sensing, 4 (6), 1804–1819. doi:10.3390/rs4061804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóvári, D. and Pfeifer, N., 2005. Segmentation based robust interpolation - a new approach to laser data filtering. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information - ISPRS Arch, 36, 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Vosselman, G., 2000. Slope based filtering of laser altimetry data. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, 33, Part B3/2 33, 678–684. doi:10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00009-4
   Google Scholar
• Wang, O., Lodha, S.K., and Helmbold, D.P., 2007. A Bayesian approach to building footprint extraction from aerial LIDAR data. Proceedings - Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission 3DPVT, 2006, 192–199. doi:10.1109/3DPVT.2006.9
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Peethambaran, J., and Chen, D., 2018. LiDAR point clouds to 3-D urban models: a review. Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 11 (2), 606–627. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2781132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., et al., 2016. Two-step adaptive extraction method for ground points and breaklines from lidar point clouds. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 119, 373–389. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, L., et al., 2021. Gaussian mixture model of ground filtering based on hierarchical curvature constraints for airborne lidar point clouds. Photogrammetric Engineering, 87 (9), 615–630. doi:10.14358/PERS.87.20-00080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, V., et al., 2018. Image classification-based ground filtering of point clouds extracted from UAV-based aerial photos. Geocarto International, 33 (3), 310–320. doi:10.1080/10106049.2016.1250825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunfei, B., Guopingb, L., and Chunxiang, C., 2008. Classification of LIDAR point cloud and generation of DTM from LIDAR height and intensity data in forested area. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37/7, 313–318.
   Google Scholar
• Zeybek, M. and Şanlıoğlu, İ., 2019. Point cloud filtering on UAV based point cloud. Measurement, 133, 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., et al., 2003. A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing: A Publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, 41 (4), 872–882. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2003.810682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., et al., 2016. An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote Sensing, 8 (6), 501–522. doi:10.3390/rs8060501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. and Lin, X., 2013. Filtering airborne LiDAR data by embedding smoothness-constrained segmentation in progressive TIN densification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 81, 44–59. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., et al., 2016. Improved progressive TIN densification filtering algorithm for airborne LiDAR data in forested areas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 117, 79–91. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q., Li, Y., and He, X., 2014. Building extraction from LIDAR point cloud data using marked point process. The Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 42 (3), 529–538. doi:10.1007/s12524-013-0358-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar